Thursday, March 30, 2006
Santa Cruz, CA -- Street Candid, Girl and Dogs
Canon GIII QL17, Ilford XP2 Super
We stopped in downtown Santa Cruz on our way to Carmel. As we walked along the main drag, I saw this little girl meet a couple of friendly retrievers. She was delighted to be able to pet them.
I quickly grabbed this shot even though the lighting was very difficult. I relied on the AE of the Canon. I had to do a bit of correction in PS because the scene was extremely backlit and contrasty. The Walgreens scan to CD was horrible, but this will have to do until I get my scanner going again.
I hope the composition makes up for the technical difficulties.
--Warren
3 Comments:
- Eric said...
-
Personally, I think the way the shades came out in this photo are pretty interesting. Gives it kind of a photojournalistic quality.
Eric - said...
-
It does indeed. What a pity that the other pet was not available in the picture. The child's expression is comforting though.
PAT - Warren T. said...
-
Pat, my first version of this picture includes the other pet. I'll post it.
--Warren
So anyway, I'm already thinking about photo opportunities there. Our last visit was in mid-April 2003. I took two old film cameras with me and my then-almost-new Canon A40 2MP digicam. This time, I'll be going all-digital.
But the main difference, of course, is not the equipment, but the photographer. Warren and I were talking about that yesterday, and it's something we both subscribe to. I now have three whole years additional experience - thousands of photos, and I've learned a lot from all that. If I have a chance, I'll try shooting some of the same scenes I did three years ago and see if there's a difference.
The photo above is from our last visit, taken with the Canon A40 and given the Scott Kelby Photoshop Elements B&W treatment. It's on a path along the edge of Parliament Hill, a bluff overlooking the Ottawa River.
3 Comments:
- Eric said...
-
It's definitely the photographer. I've seen some really cool stuff taken with some pretty funky cameras, and I've seen some really bad stuff with some cameras that do everything except wash the dishes.
Eric - Warren T. said...
-
Gail and I were in Ottawa and the rest of Eastern Canada in the late 90's. We flew into Montreal and took the train between cities, and flew out of Toronto. It was a great trip. I remember this spot on Parliament Hill. The government buildings in Ottawa are very nice. Someday I'll need to dig out those old photos to see if any are worth posting here.
I look forward to seeing your new "view" of Ottawa. This 3 years old one is very nice. It has the classic leading lines from the fence, directing attention to the main subject.
--Warren - said...
-
Quick shutter-action and a nice shot! I wonder what it would be like if say "an inch" was removed from the right-hand edge thereby doing without the "hook" in particular. Perhaps displaying it in a little-more-than square format then.
PAT
Wednesday, March 29, 2006
3 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Hey, this looks familiar :)...
http://fpcf.blogspot.com/2006/03/urban-decor.html
BTW, I like the natural colors.
--WT - Eric said...
-
Thx, and I like the natural colors, too. I have to admit, though, it's a lot of fun playing with the saturation.
Ej - said...
-
Yes, among other things, you did successfully make this a "picture with many colors". Nice work!
PAT
"What Would Warren Do?..." (WWWD?)
This morning, I went to meet someone at a marina nearby to drop off some prints - I hadn't been there before, and while I was waiting, I saw this scene... not something I think I would have even noticed before, but when I saw it this time, I thought, "hey, that's something Warren would shoot!"
Since I had my trusty new Canon A620 with me, I took a few shots. At least, I think it's a "Warren Photo" - what do you think?? In any event, it's "Warren-inspired" :-)
I wanted to get this up on the Forum, especially so Warren could see it - I'm still at work and just took a few minutes to suck today's photos into my PC and desaturate it in Picassa - I'll try to do a better B&W conversion in the next few days (there really was hardly any color in this image, anyway.)
6 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
What incredible timing!!!
I had just posted my "Fence Arrow" shot just before you posted the WWWD shot :).
So I guess the answer is yes, it would be a subject that I would shoot! Too funny!
--WT - SteveR said...
-
wow - yeah, look at those time stamps - 11 minutes apart - well, I couldn't wait any longer to see if it was a true "Warren Woulda Shot It" (WWSI) photo... and I'm really glad you think it is! That's too cool.
What can I say, Warren, great minds think alike, no?
-- SteveR - Benson said...
-
I'll have to chime in and say that without looking at who posted the picture, I thought it was Warren's. How about that?
- Warren T. said...
-
uh-oh, maybe i'm becoming too predictable :) :P
here's a future monthly project:
shoot like someone else on the forum, hehehheh...
--WT - SteveR said...
-
Hi Benson - would you say that it was a .... Tang-y ... photo?
(Ouch! what a terrible pun!)
Warren - that's not a bad idea!
- SteveR - Warren T. said...
-
We can shelve the idea until we get some more samples from the other folks on the forum (don't know when that would be though, it may be a while).
SteveR, you have a very obvious style. This is an honest question for you and everyone else: Do I have a recognizable style? I tend to run the gamut of subject matter, but perhaps you can still tell it's me despite the subject???
I would really like to know.
--WT
3 Comments:
- SteveR said...
-
Yeah man! Great "street-photography-instant-composition."
The wide-angle perspective of the fencing coming to a point is great, and of course, the pedestrian is in just the right spot.
In addition, what a beautiful reddish color and texture on the wall in the background. Contrasts great with the silver of the fencing.
-- SteveR - Eric said...
-
I love those angles.
Eric - said...
-
A good and pleasantly eye-leading shot displaying superb wide angle perspective indeed. The moving pedestrian added "life" into the picture and scored extra credit for the photographer.
PAT
Tuesday, March 28, 2006
A View of Coit Tower
Eric
2 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Hi Eric, there are a few other things that you can try here even in this B&W image. You can dodge the shadows, and burn the highlights, to even out the levels a bit, then bump the contrast a little to give the image a little more oomph.
Also, did you know that you can do perspective control in Photoshop? You can compensate for the "falling down backwards" effect that you get when shooting at certain angles with a wide angle lens. This usually fell into the realm of the perspective control lens in pre-digital days, but it can be done with some success in the digital darkroom these days with Photoshop. I'm not sure if the book that I lent you talks about this, but you can find info on it in on the Internet. Just something to keep in mind, maybe for next time.
BTW, I often can't resist taking this picture every time I walk by this alley, but I restrained myself that day, and avoided it :). Glad you got the shot.
--WT - Eric said...
-
Thx for the comments. If I have time before Friday, I will check this out.
ej
Stack O' Stetsons
I was just looking for some old images to play around with that grayscale technique from Scott Kelby's book - I found this one from my old Canon A40 2MP digicam - cropping the photo to leave in just the middle abstracted the Stetsons a bit to emphasize the shapes of the brims - I kinda liked it, and I guess it turned out to be more successful than I realized (you should see the uncropped image - it ain't much to look at :-)
1 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Hi Steve, thanks for posting this. I like this picture for a number of reasons:
- It's very original
- It's true to your style
- It's technically excellent (good job on the B&W conversion)
- It's a beautiful composition, starting with the beautiful s-curve of the lowest brim, then having the successive brims repeat the pattern, but slowly flatten out. It takes a practiced eye to "see" this pattern.
--Warren
434 Posts and Counting
Amazing, isn't it? When I started this forum back in September, 2004, I didn't really know what to expect. I had just "discovered" blogging, so I decided to create this forum, invite some friends, and just see what happens.
Now, nineteen months later, we have over 400 pictures on the forum, with many very interesting and informative comments and articles along the way. I never imagined that the forum would grow like this, and frankly, I almost pulled the plug on it a few times.
I am very happy that all of you decided to join in on the fun, and I want to say that I fully understand the ebb and flow of participation on the forum. And the beauty of all this is that it's all free! I just ask that you give me some feedback once in a while to let me know that you are still enjoying the pictures and still interested in the forum.
Questions for you:
I do want to ask you this though, is Blogger.com still the right venue for our forum?
Or should we investigate other types of photo forum software?
As the number of pictures in our gallery grow, it feels like there is really no organization to all the pictures, or is that just the nature of a blog based forum?
How do you like the look and feel of the forum? Is it still satisfactory?
Even if there was a facility to organize the pictures better, how would we do it? I'm not sure if there is a good way, other than just leave it as a chronological sequence.
Do you still want to keep our forum private? Or should I publish to web directories and search engines? What are your thoughts on this?
Do you know anyone who might be interested in joining us? If so, please go ahead and invite them to check us out, and if they want to join, just send me an email.
When I have time, I really enjoy going back through the archives viewing the pictures and comments. There are a lot of nice shots on the forum.
One thing is obvious, because of my obsession with photography, my picture posts probably outnumber everyone else combined by a factor of 10 to 1 :). Maybe I should not post so many, especially so many at one time. They probably scroll by before anyone has a chance to get a good look at them or comment on them.
Thanks for reading, and Happy Shooting!
Warren
Obligatory Picture Post:
"Modern Church, Japantown", Nikon D100, Tokina 17mm
5 Comments:
- SteveR said...
-
I very much like the clean geometry of the way you composed this - you really know how to put a wide-wide-angle to good use. The fellow sitting there (in just the right spot, too!) keeps it from being TOO much of a geometry thing.
-- SteveR - SteveR said...
-
Oh, I forgot to respond to your questions!...
My first reaction is that Blogger is OK - easy enough to use and suits our purpose at least for now. But I haven't given any alternative any thought.
I do like the look & feel.
Facility to organize the pictures better - that's a good question - it would be nice if there were a way to have a "gallery" area in addition to the chronological blog
Private or Public - I'm ok either way.
Going back thru the archives is indeed a pleasure!
As far as your photos - I say, Post Away! I always at least look at every one, even if I don't always have time to comment.
Finally, I'd like to thank you Warren for starting the forum and keeping enthusiastic about it. I'm happy to be a part of it.
Best regards,
SteveR - Eric said...
-
Hi!
I like the geometry of the pic. Good shot.
Now for answers to your questions:
1) I guess Blogger is still the right venue. I don't know of anyother unless you want to go full blast and create your very own webpage, html and all.
2) No organization to the forum? True. Bad? Nope. I know that there are monthly themes, but I like the fact that we don't stick to it all the time (in my case, at all). People don't always have the time to stick to a theme and well, a nice shot is a nice shot.
3)I like the way the forum is setup. The feel is informal and I like that. It's not stiff. There's room for something different and that's fun. It's structured but not too structured.
4)I say keep the forum private. It's gonna get too crazy if anyone and everyone gets involved and starts posting.
5)I get the feeling my friend at work still hasn't contacted you about the forum. She's currently taking classes (for video stuff) and I think she's kinda busy.
On the whole, I really appreciate you telling me about the forum and encouraging me to participate. It's gotten me back into something I really enjoy. I've never been good at visual art stuff and this is something I have some ability at.
Thanks man. This has really provided me w/a creative outlet.
Ej - Warren T. said...
-
I don't think it's possible on blogger, but I would love a gallery or filter feature that produces a link that filters by contributor, so that I can view all posts by a single contributor grouped together.
Also, the search feature is broken on this blog. I'm not sure why, but it would be a handy thing to help navigate through all the pictures.
Eric, what I meant about making the forum public is to have it listed in search engines and other blog directories. By doing so, we'll have many more viewers who may make comments. But only the forum members will be able to post pictures. I already have the forum linked on my personal blog, and it's part of my signature file. I think I'll just leave it fully private for now, more cozy and open this way. - Eric said...
-
That's true. Only the people you "invite" can post on the blog. I forgot. If that's the case, then I say have it listed on search engines. Never know what you'll get.
Monday, March 27, 2006
Nightclub Sign Abstract
I was walking inside the Kinokuniya Building. It's like an indoor shopping mall. I saw this entrance to a nightclub in a darkened hallway off to the side. It was 11am in the morning, but it seemed like the middle of the night. I thought that the lights made some interesting patterns.
--Warren
5 Comments:
- Eric said...
-
This is a very interesting photo. I like the angle you were able to get on this set of stairs. It just seems a tad too dark, but I don't know if monitor settings are involved here.
I like it. - Warren T. said...
-
I was wondering if someone was going to say that it's too dark. :)
Actually, I wanted to accentuate the bright handrails and stairs, and let everything else fade into black, but I guess that can also be interpreted as being too dark.
I had a version that was lighter, but it wasn't as interesting.
I wonder if there's a better way to handle this. Anyone have any ideas?
--WT - Warren T. said...
-
Eric, I lightened it just a tad, is it little better now?
--WT - Eric said...
-
Yes, that looks better.There's more of a fade to black effect now.
- SteveR said...
-
It's quite a beautiful photo, Warren!
The shapes are magnificent (sort of reminds me of a big musical note.) Also, a nice balance between the deep shadows and the strong highlights on the stairway.
-- SteveR
FPCF News & Rollcall Time Again
I visited SteveR's blog the other day, and I noticed that Steve was awarded Donor of the Day for a second day in a row! Congratulations, Steve! I really like that picture, and I hope Steve chooses to post it here on FPCF too.
We're such a small and close knit group, I am always concerned when people drop off and disappear. So, it would be great if you can spend just a few minutes to check in here and let us know how you've been, and what you're up to.
Here's the latest news from my point of view:
Me -- Well, as you can tell by my recent postings, my love for shooting film and for shooting with a wide variety of equipment is still very strong. I was very impressed with the lens and AE performance of the Canon GIII. I now know why this little gem of a camera has so many fans. Next up, when I have time, is the Fed 3B. I still don't have my Nikon Coolscan film scanner online. I have not had time to install the new SCSI that I bought, and I have not had time to find the correct SCSI cable.
SteveR -- Steve has been busy winning Donor of the Day awards at Usefilm.com. Two days in a row, amazing! I really appreciate Steve's articles on Photoshop technique, and his willingness to share his points of view on various composition topics.
Dolph -- Finally, a couple of picture posts from Dolph. I know that Dolph is busy with his new job as Corporate Controller of a manufacturing company.
Jill -- Jill, our resident artist, is usually busier with work, and her other interests. I don't think she is set up at home for easy Internet access even though she has a new computer now. I told Jill that I would write up her bio for the bio page, and I still owe her that (along with a funny picture of her).
Benson -- With the demands of running a Orthodontic practice, and raising a young daughter, it's not surprising that Benson is mostly in "lurk" mode. I do know that Benson recently acquired a nice 12-24mm superwide zoom lens, and I'm hoping to see some more shots from it.
Martin -- Hey Martin, you've been quiet. I hope everything is okay with you.
Tony -- I heard from Benson that Tony has been very busy with work (teacher), and with taking photo classes (for his intended new career in photography). I hope Tony decides to engage in this group again, I'm very interested to see some of his latest work.
Dennis -- Dennis recently re-acquired a Nikon D100 dslr. I'm looking forward to having Dennis back on the forum with posts and his excellent analysis and commentary.
Steve F. -- Steve told me that his current interest is digital video, so Steve may be in permanent lurk mode. He did say that he still wants to participate sometime in the future, but I'm not sure what that will be.
Pat -- Pat has been the commentor-extraordinaire recently, even though I know that he is very busy with his new company. I wonder if his friend, Larry, was able to show Pat the benefits of the "digital darkroom", like Larry had planned.
Eric -- Eric has made the forum come alive with his enthusiastic participation. There will be a drop off for sure, when Eric takes some time off to visit his parents back in Natick, MA. But he's bringing his digicam, so I expect him to take TONS of pictures and inundate the forum when he gets back!
So it's your turn, what's going on with you???
Happy Shooting!
Warren
6 Comments:
- SteveR said...
-
Hello All!
Warren - thank you for this very nice post - it's great to hear what everyone else is doing. Also thank you so much for your kind words on my photos.
Best regards to all,
SteveR - Eric said...
-
Well, I hope I'll shoot a couple of nice ones. Perhaps Boston or the Charles River. If I take a ton, I'm bound to get a couple of good ones. We'll see...
- SteveR said...
-
"...If I take a ton, I'm bound to get a couple of good ones. ..."
Now your talkin', Eric! That's exactly the right attitutde. See my blog post from last year on exactly this philosophy at http://therosenblog.blogspot.com/2005/09/most-of-my-pictures-suck.html
BTW, in a previous life, when I was younger, so much younger than today, I was married to a girl from Lexington whose family had lived in Natick when she was a little girl. I got married at age 21 - it was not a good match, however, and we separated & got divorced a few years later - with no kids fortunately. My only regret is that I shoulda sued for custody of my ex-In-Laws - they were wonderful ;-)
The happy end of the story is I did better 2nd time around - Sandy & I celebrated our 25th anniversary last July.
When are you flying to Massachusetts? I haven't been there in more than 25 years, but I remember that whole area was beautiful
Best regards,
SteveR - Eric said...
-
Steve, so you know Natick, MA, too? Ever feel like you are supposed to know certain people in your life??? Anywho...
In regard to taking pix and getting the shots you really want, you really like, & that are really worth posting or printing, I learned a long time ago, that doesn't happen too often in this life. Heck, then they wouldn't be special, right? And that would take the fun out of it.
I will be heading back to Natick on 3/31 to check in on the parents for a couple of weeks. They are old now and w/my sis and brother-in-law gone for a couple of wks, I wanted to be sure I am around. And you are right, the area around there is nice. I've grown to appreciate it a lot more over the yrs.
So you know Natick. Man, wonders will never cease.
Later.
Ej - SteveR said...
-
Hi Eric,
Actually, I don't really know Natick well - just from passing through there. The Ex lived there years before I met her. However, I know OF Natick because of the amazing Army lab there where they design the latest BDU's, do research on MRE's etc.
But in any event, I wish you a good trip and all the best to your parents. - Eric said...
-
Thx, Steve.
2 Comments:
- Eric said...
-
Great photo, man. Looks like something out of the late 1800's.
- Warren T. said...
-
Thanks. I just looked this up. Mission Carmel was the 2nd mission founded in California by Father Junipero Serra. It was built on the current site in 1771. And it's becoming one of my favorite photo locations when we're visiting the area.
--WT
3 Comments:
- Eric said...
-
Is this a part of the DaVinci Code? Nice shot.
- SteveR said...
-
Yes, a very nice shot, indeed!
I really like the way you used that interesting diagonal shadow as a design element. Great that you noticed this scene, and well executed, too.
You got your money's worth, and more, out of your new Canonet!
-- SteveR - Benson said...
-
Again, chiming in after Steve. I really like this photo. Very nice how the shadow lies right along the lower half of the statue so it is highlighted. Almost looks like a flash or some supplemental light was used.
Sunday, March 26, 2006
Carmel Ranch Fence
Canon GIII QL17, Ilford XP2 Super
Hey Gang! I finally got my first roll back from the Canon GIII. Even with the cheap scan to CD from Walgreens, I am VERY impressed by the Canon's 40mm f1.7 lens.
Gail and I were checking out the Carmel Ranch Resort. As we walked the grounds, I was struck by the majestic sweep of this white fence.
--Warren
Saturday, March 25, 2006
1 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
I forgot to ask you: which one of the 3 in the series do you like the most?
--WT
4 Comments:
- SteveR said...
-
A very, very good series, Warren - I like this one (#2) the best, but I like them all.
You really managed to get excellent exposure for both the reflection and the surrounding "frame",especially on #2 and #3.
I think I like #2 best because the "frame" is more secondary than in #1 and #3 ... and because there are only so may ways to include the arch - you had to either cut off a piece in #3 (arcus interruptus) or leave in stuff outside the arc as in #1. In both of these cases, the arc is, in my mind, either the primary element or at least a co-equal element with the reflection.
But in #2, the reflection is definitely the main element, and "suggesting" the arc in the upper left corner as you did works very, very well for me - the Gestalt that you taught us about does its job and fills in the "arc-i-ness" of it without any distraction whatsoever from the "frame" - the "frame" in this case is totally complementary to the main subject.
How's THAT for an artsy-fartsy analysis??? :-)
-- SteveR - Benson said...
-
I'll have to chime in and agree with Steve. For me, I liked the composition of this photo. I liked how the light fixture appears to be an element in the sky like the sun or moon. Very nicely exposed as well.
- Warren T. said...
-
Steve,
I just found out that this old church has quite a history. It was originally a synagogue from the 1890's, serving the 20,000 Jews who settled in this neighborhood before it became Japantown. I uncovered more infomation about it, and I posted it on my personal blog. Be sure to follow the link to the museum exhibit...
http://warren128.blogspot.com/2006/04/victorian-reflection.html
--Warren - Steve said...
-
Warren,
I really like this shot a lot. The composition came out great in what looks like a very difficult to compose shot. Both the upward lean and the direction of the clouds add nicely to the composition. Very well done!
Steve F
Victorian Reflection
Nikon D100, Tokina 17mm
This is the facade of an old church that was restored, and converted into a senior citizen residential care facility. This was one of the former church's doorways.
The reflection of the classic Victorian buildings across the street caught my eye, and also the strange fact that they left the stairs leading into the window (no more doors).
--Warren
Friday, March 24, 2006
Better B&W From Digital
The original was color, but I thought it would look better as a B&W image. Tonight, I tried a technique from Scott Kelby's book "The Photoshop Elements 4 Book for Digital Photographers" that seems to produce a significantly better B&W image than just removing the color from the image. I wrote up the instructions in a post on my blog tonight at http://therosenblog.blogspot.com/2006/03/better-bw-from-digital.html Give it a try if you have Photoshop Elements (I know it will work with Version 2 and 3, at least.) It should also work with "regular" Photoshop, but Scott says that Channel Mixer (not included in Elements) is the normal way to go there.
Hope you find it useful.
Regards,
SteveR
3 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Hi Steve, this is very useful information. I have a couple of Scott Kelby books too. Great stuff. For the last few years, i've already been using the Photoshop channel mixer technique for converting color to B&W. I'm not sure if anyone else on the forum uses Elements. Maybe they will de-lurk and speak up.
Oh, btw, nice shot! Have I seen it before? It looks familiar.
--Warren - SteveR said...
-
Thanks, Warren - you are right, by the way - I did post this photo (cheap-and-dirty grayscale version) in mid-February with the story of the Road Trip Ben & I took to Drexel & NYC.
-- SteveR - Warren T. said...
-
It would have been a good shot for our January Reflections Project. :)
--WT
4 Comments:
- Eric said...
-
Nice photo. I like the way the fence just gradually disappears.
Ej - SteveR said...
-
I agree with Eric - I really like this one, too. You rendered the fog and the "disappearing act" so well.
I also like the way you've abstracted this scene to a combination of simple shapes (hey, how about that for Art School Talk, Eric? ;-) - and you know how much I like that sort of thing.
One suggestion you might try - I covered up a small part of the right-hand edge - so that the entire pole- the one with the knob at the top- is just barely included. I found that I liked the overall composition better when I didn't see that little separate bit of fencing mesh at the extreme right.
-- SteveR - Warren T. said...
-
Thanks guys.
My original crop on this shot showed more of the fence on the right side including a yellow "Caution" sign.
My next crop was exactly like Steve suggested.
While reviewing that one, I decided that it felt "incomplete" to me (I don't know why, it's just a feeling). It felt a bit too static.
So on this final crop, I showed a bit more of the fence on the right. I felt that it gave a "beginning" to the leftward flow, and it gave a hint at what was on the right side of the scene (outside of the picture). I guess it "opens" the image on the right side, in Gestalt terms. So perhaps for me, it "flows" better.
Or maybe I just had too much coffee this morning :).
--Warren - said...
-
The fog kind of sucessfully added an "open to imagination" mood to this simple yet thought-catching shot. The title did put in more.PAT
Thursday, March 23, 2006
Bridgewalker
I took about a half-hour in the morning last weekend to walk around the Spa Creek Drawbridge in Annapolis. I was under the bridge on the Eastport end when I looked up and noticed the possibilities of getting a solitary figure crossing over.
This one has a lot of the elements that I often (maybe subconsiously) look for - strong diagonal, simple shapes, repeating pattern, "a little bit of something in a lot of nothing" (i.e., the lone walker.)
... and what do you know - I posted this one on Usefilm.com Tuesday, and today it showed up with a Donor Image of the Day "award." Not exactly the Pulitzer Prize, but I nice ego-stroke nevertheless ;-)
Another Usefilm member, Hugo de Wolf of the Netherlands, took the time to make an extensive comment with some suggestions - most notably that it would be nice to get the lamp out of the photo. So I did some editing in Photoshop Elements and produced the second photo - which I think is cleaner and "better" overall - of course, it's all subjective.
-- SteveR
3 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Steve, congratulations on the DOD Award! That's great!
Yes, it's all subjective. The lamp in the original picture doesn't bother me at all, though when you see the pictures side by side, I would have to agree that the second picture does look "cleaner".
--Warren - Eric said...
-
Congrats on the award, Steve. I, like you, like simple shapes and patterns, too. Nice photos.
Ej - said...
-
Hey, Congratulatons, Steve. They sure picked the right photo to award. I tend to go for the second photo too. PAT
Recent Additions to my RF Collection
The first one is my 4th FSU (Former Soviet Union) camera. The make/model is Fed 3B. I bought this from a seller on Ebay who I used before. He has a good reputation, and he does CLA's and checks out the equipment before selling. Of the 4 FSU cameras that I now own, this one, with its Industar-61 52mm f2.8 lens, is in the best condition. Some FSU camera fans dubbed this the "Flattop" because it was the first Fed to depart from the traditional Leica Barnack style of rangefinder housing. It was also the first to feature a wind lever instead of a knob. And, it has the full range of shutter speeds from 1 sec. to 1/500. The I-61 50mm lens is considered the best FSU 50mm in terms of sharpness and contrast, and I'm eager to put it and the camera through its paces. I got this one for $48 (!!!) shipped from the Ukraine. It's an unbeatable bargain for a full featured, interchangeable lens (in Leica screw mount), 35mm rangefinder camera. The Fed 3 was a very successful and popular model of the 60-s to the 70-s. Fed produced over 2 million of them (cameras for the people!), so they are plentiful and cheap today.
The 2nd camera is a 70's vintage Canon/Canonet GIII QL17. Yes folks, this is my very first Canon (gasp, choke). Well, I've been casually looking for one of these for a very long time, ever since I first read about its many virtues. I was cruising the Rangefinder forum site one day, and I happened to spot a recently placed ad for this camera for only $50 + $10 shipping. Again, this is a very good price for a CLA'd and properly working GIII QL17 in excellent condition, and it was from a fellow RFF member. On RFF, you have to be quick on the trigger to be able to snag a bargain. I made the decision within minutes of the ad being placed, otherwise someone else would have snapped it up immediately. Cameras in similar condition routinely sell for $65 to as high as $125 or more on Ebay.
The GIII QL17 (lousy name, isn't it) was Canon's last and greatest iteration of a full featured 35mm, fixed lens, leaf shutter, rangefinder camera. It had a very long run, so good used examples can still be found, though prices are slowly rising as more RF enthusiasts are beginning to collect it. Some of the features that I like about it are:
- Fast, sharp, fixed lens with an interesting focal length (40mm f1.7)
- Quick film loading (the QL17 part). This was a very innovative feature for its day
- Large and bright viewfinder
- Shutter priority auto exposure. I would have preferred aperture priority, but I can live with it.
- Fully manual operation that does not require a battery.
- Very quiet operation. It uses a leaf shutter, which is much quieter than focal plane shutters.
I shot a test roll (XP2 Super) through the camera on our overnight trip to Carmel last weekend. I'll post some pictures if they turn out okay.
If you're interested in reading more about these cameras, there is plenty of information on them available on the web. Just do a search on "Fed 3B" or "GIII QL17"
--Warren
5 Comments:
- SteveR said...
-
Ah, the sight of that beautiful FED-3 has me singing...
So-YUZ nay-ru-SHI-mi res-POOB-lik svo-BOHD-nik.....
("Everlasting Union of free republics...", the beginning line of the Soviet Hymn - remember the scene in Hunt for Red October when the crew belted it out? -- the words now have a joke-like character, don't they? :-)
My first Soviet camera was a flattop FED-3, and to quote myself from http://geocities.com/fzorkis/stoisha1.html "...The rangefinder housing extended completely across the entire body, a simple and elegant design reminiscent of the Leica M3. And while nobody who has picked up an M3 will mistake the proletarian gear-gnashing of the FED 3 for the velvety feel of the Leica, this Soviet model is a very good shooter and capable of soldiering on for years..." You will really enjoy your new FED-3, Comrade Warren!
The Canonet you got is a great bargain for what you paid for it - good work!! This model is, in my opinion, the pinnacle of compact rangefinder design of the late 60's and early 70's. You should get the performance of a Leica CL at 1/10th the price.
I can't wait to see your photos from either of these gems, Warren.
You've inspired me, also -- even a die-hard born-again-digital guy like me should take a few exposures with film once a year or so - I'm long, long overdue.
I have a beautiful 1964 Kiev 4a that has sat on the shelf too long - I will shoot a roll with it next month (or maybe I should wait until May Day ;-)
Also, we have a very nice Chinese rangefinder, a Phenix 205-A that I should give a try.
I'll try to do it right and shoot slow or medium-speed slide film to get the most out of these Glorious Commie lenses.
BTW, who did you buy the FED-3 from?
-- SteveR - SteveR said...
-
I forgot this - you may already have seen it but just in case... a great article on the Canonet by Steven Gandy at http://cameraquest.com/canql17.htm
- Warren T. said...
-
Dear Comrade Stoisha,
I will endeavor to live up to the great tradition of photography for the masses that you introduced to the free world. I studied your site carefully when I first began to educate myself on these glorious cameras.
Sincerely,
Comrade Warren
p.s. The seller who I like on Ebay is "cupog". And yes, Stephen Gandy's Cameraquest.com site is a great source of info. - SteveR said...
-
"cupog" has a great reputation and really unusual, beautiful stuff, doesn't he? I have spent hours in the past browsing his listings. Three years ago, I bought nearly mint and perfectly-operating black Zenit TTL SLR with a sharp f/2 50mm lens from him- it was $24 plus $14 shipping - a very decent camera for $38!
I keep lusting after one of the late-model Czech Flexaret TLRs that he sometimes lists. I wonder if I can adapt a digital back to one of those ;-)
-- SteveR - Warren T. said...
-
Cupog has very interesting stuff for sale. I was just looking in his Ebay store this morning and I noticed a Yashica Lynx 5000e selling for about the right price (around $50). I already have a 5000e, and in fact, I need to rotate it out of the camera cabinet for some exercise soon. My Lynx 5000e needs a foam replacement, I think, but other than that, it's in excellent condition, and those old Yashica RF cameras had REALLY nice lenses.
--WT
Wednesday, March 22, 2006
Dining Out in Palo Alto
Got a shot of a restaurant patio before it got crowded. If you look at the gate, you are going to see barrel distortion. (Gives it a kind of Adams Family mansion effect.) Well, instead of trying to fight it, I am going to try and learn how to use it. Gonna be tricky, but we'll see what happens. If I don't try, I'll never know.
Eric
4 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
I think you successfully managed the distortion in this picture. If you didnt' mention it, I would have just assumed that it was part of the gate design. :)
--WT - Eric said...
-
Thx. I want to be able to learn to work with imperfections in lenses. It's like you and one of my co-workers said, you have to get to know your equipment and use it well. I'm trying to use this distortion well. If I can, then it turns into more of a feature than a problem.
- SteveR said...
-
Hi Eric,
"...I want to be able to learn to work with imperfections in lenses..."
No, it's not a bug, it's a FEATURE! ;-)
-- SteveR - Eric said...
-
See? What did I tell ya? I was on the right track. It's a feature dagnabbit!
Ej
Tuesday, March 21, 2006
Homeless Clothing
3 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Hi Eric,
Nice B&W shot with good tonal range.
One could make a case for shooting this in color, the better to show the age and dirt on the old jacket. In B&W, all that stuff gets reduced to shades of gray so it's not as apparent. :)
So your challenge in B&W was to convey that homeless message with only the composition and other elements of the picture (other than color).
Maybe positioning the jacket more towards the left side of the image and showing more of the empty bench... (just thinking aloud).
--WT - Eric said...
-
Thx for the input. I didn't think about how color would show the age and dirt. I agree that the pic would've been better had it been on the left side of the image. I thought about that after I posted it.
As for positioning the jacket, dude, I didn't want to touch it. Maybe I should've asked Genie to position it. Yeah, good idea. I'll tell her you suggested that. - Warren T. said...
-
i didn't mean for you to physically move the jacket :).
I meant positioning it within your image composition by framing it differently, or alternatively, choosing a different camera position.
I wouldn't touch that jacket either.
--WT
Gotcha!
Nikon F2, Vivitar 75-260mm
Here's one from the dusty, musty archives.
One of my best friends, Curtis, invited me to his black belt promotional way back in the 80's. Here he's in the section of the promotional where he has to spar with the black belts. The sparring style was contact with control. It was a very intense day.
This was my best shot of the day, taken while sitting in the bleacher seats.
--Warren
1 Comments:
- Eric said...
-
Great shot! You captured the guy's concentration and he's in a real good pose. The concentration, though, is what makes the photo. Good timing.
Sunday, March 19, 2006
Another Capoeira Photo
Eric
4 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Nice action shots! And good catch on the handstand shot.
--WT - Eric said...
-
Thank you. After looking at the handstand shot, I could've done a better job on the cropping. The more I look at it the more I may redo it. You would've loved seeing these guys. Not only was it fun, but in regard to martial arts stuff, it's really different - but it really works. I wouldn't want to get a kick from them. Very live kicks to say the least. - Eric
- Warren T. said...
-
Maybe as a follow-up to the first shot, this one can be cropped closer, perhaps isolating just the practitioners and exclude the musicians.
I've never seen a demo live, but I've seen Capoeira on TV. It's a very interesting art.
--WT - Eric said...
-
Thx. I'll do that. I was thinking of keeping the musicians but the photo would look better w/just the 2 who are sparring. I'll check it out tonite.
ej
Saturday, March 18, 2006
Capoeira in Palo Alto
Genie and I were in Palo Alto today, and we came upon a group of guys who were practicing Capoeira. Capoeira is a form of martial art created by slaves in Brazil. It masqueraded as a dance (to hide it's true meaning from slave owners) and it is very athletic and beautiful. These guys were having a lot of fun.
In this photo, the 2 on the left were in the midst of a bout and the 2 on the right were accompanying them with a drum and with what I believe is called a berimbau. If I am wrong and it is not a berimbau, let me know.
Eric
Friday, March 17, 2006
Transamerica Pyramid Bubble Machine
Sony DSC-D770
I was looking through my digital archives and I found this shot from Aug. 2000 that I took with my then new to me Sony digicam. This was image #724 from the camera.
Gail and I took a walk through Telegraph Hill. I've always liked this view of the Pyramid from this neighborhood.
I was a little annoyed by the lens flare during the shooting that day, but on this shot I decided to have some fun with it.
--Warren
Thursday, March 16, 2006
Wednesday, March 15, 2006
2 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Interesting grab shot.
I was wondering if you're still experimenting with color settings. The colors here seem overly saturated and un-natural. The last few color pictures that you posted were like this too.
If this is your preferred "look" on color shots, then I won't say anything about it in your future posts.
--WT - Eric said...
-
You are correct. I like to mess around with the color. It wasn't what I saw. The color of the tile, for ex., wasn't this bright. Just experimenting with saturation, color, and all those fun tools in Picasa and Adobe. Actually, the original photo isn't very vibrant at all.
I was discussing color photographs with one of the guys that works at the photo store on Irving St. He was right. It can be very distracting from what is actually in a photograph. When photos are taken in b&w, the observer has to look at the photo harder to see what is actually there. Color can add to it if it communicates a msg but it can easily distract. Or, it can be the main point of it. I guess it all depends on what you are trying to do.
Color is fun and I like to experiment with it, but I think b&w is the way to go.
Sunday, March 12, 2006
1 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Nice shot.
When I was around that age (7 to 12 or so), the local fad with the bad-boy hotrodders was to jack up classic and muscle cars like the 1955 to 1957 Chevy BelAir about 12 inches off the ground, both front and rear!
Naturally, as a modeler, I modified my "stock" models to look like the real cars driving in our neighborhood.
Looks like you had great weather on your trip. The sun and white car make this scene high contrast, and as a result makes it difficult to catch shadow detail. Maybe you can experiment with using the built-in flash of the D70 for fill flash to try getting a little detail in the shadows, or alternatively, try correcting for it in Photoshop.
Would you happen to have a close up of those oil bottles? I'd like to see better, why you thought they were so impressive :).
--Warren
p.s. You should change your image size to max of 800 pixels on the long side.
Saturday, March 11, 2006
1 Comments:
- SteveR said...
-
I like it! The shapes (of the sign and the corner of the building) go together nicely, and I like the saturated red and blue, contrasted with the bright white and neutral concrete.
-- SteveR
1 Comments:
- SteveR said...
-
This is a great example of what I like to call "a little bit of something in a lot of nothing." It's very effective when you do it right, as you did here.
The black, black window on the right really adds to the contrast.
Besides the color contrasts, nice geometry.
-- SteveR
Friday, March 10, 2006
Thursday, March 09, 2006
2 Comments:
- SteveR said...
-
Very imaginative! I never thought about how we hold a digicam, and it does look like a vaguely fascist salute :-)
Also, a very good vista you captured here.
-- SteveR - Warren T. said...
-
Steve, have you watched many Chinese martial arts movies? The Chinese greeting or salute is done by holding the right fist inside the left palm extended about 10 to 12 inches in front, at about chin level. It looks just like the digiam salute :).
--Warren
Wednesday, March 08, 2006
2 Comments:
- Eric said...
-
Nice shot. As you know, I like shots of buildings and this photo has some very cool, clean lines. I like it.
Eric - Warren T. said...
-
Thanks Eric. I just realized that we forgot to do one thing that day, and I guess we didn't really have much time. But next time, I would like to use your camera for an extended shooting session so that I can really try it. I am interested in using the EVF for an extended time to see if I can get used to one (just for fun).
That day, I realized that your DSC-H1 is a great stealth camera. It's extremely quiet. That would be a great asset in some situations.
--Warren
Camouflage Failure
Nikon D100
This is the same apartment buiilding from the previous post. I loved the design of the balconies, and I noticed the sky blue roof structures. I'm guessing that they were painted this color so that they would blend into the sky and become invisible. However, on a cloudy, overcast day like last Sunday, they might as well have been painted red. :) The blue really stood out against the light sky, and gray building.
--Warren
1 Comments:
- Eric said...
-
Again, the clean lines on a building. The contrast between the deep black and the blue is nice. It's like I can reach into the black with my whole arm, and I like the shade of blue.
Ej
1 Comments:
- SteveR said...
-
This is really super, Warren! It's defintely one that makes me say, "gee, I wish *I* had taken that!"
The way you composed it to emphasize that double curve is beautiful.
-- SteveR
0 Comments:
Post a Comment