Monday, February 28, 2005


Garden Gate, Bessa R, CV 35mm f2.5, Kodak UC100 Posted by Hello

This shot had the flare spot too, but I cleaned it up a bit with Photoshop.

-- Warren

4 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Wouldn't you know it, every time I go out to test some equipment, I get typical San Francisco weather, overcast and cold.

I tried to show the symmetry of the garden's design. You can see it when standing just in front of the gate. So Benson, do you like it? :)

Does anyone else beside Jill and me still shoot film? I was looking for a replacement for Royal Gold 200 which is discontinued, so I decided to try a few rolls of Kodak Ultracolor 100 professional. I have not shot ISO 100 negative film for a long time, and I must say that this UC100 is very impressive. It has some very good attributes: very fine and sharp grain, great shadow detail, excellent color saturation, and ease of scanning (not much correction needed). I also ordered some Fuji Realea for comparison.

-- Warren

Tuesday, March 1, 2005 at 7:45:00 AM PST  
Blogger martin said...

Is the flare towards the top of the photo? You should not be getting flare on an overcast day. Maybe you have a filter on the lens? Try doing a test without a filter. I borrowed a friend's 40mm Distagon for the Hasselblad and found it had a flare problem. I couldn't deal with it.

Friday, March 4, 2005 at 10:02:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

The flare was in the same spot in every picture where it appeared. After I finished the roll, I noticed a smudge on the front lens element. Maybe that was what caused it? I was shooting bare lens because I didn't have time to buy a filter for it yet.

I hope the smudge was the problem. If not, that's a pretty serious flare problem.

-- WT

Friday, March 4, 2005 at 10:13:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

And to answer the qustion, yes, it was in the upper right side of the photo (see previous picture post).

-- WT

Friday, March 4, 2005 at 10:13:00 AM PST  

Post a Comment


Shakespeare Garden, GG Park, CV Bessa R, CV 35mm f2.5, Kodak UC100. Posted by Hello

Any guesses as to what caused that flare spot? There was not enough light that day, so I had to shoot too slow and too wide open. That's why this image is not as sharp as I would have liked.

-- Warren

0 Comments:

Post a Comment


My Favorite Test Subject, CV Bessa R, Jupiter-8 50mm f2.0, Kodak UC100. Posted by Hello

I really like this lens! This is the lens that came with my 1962 vintage Zorki-4 FSU camera. The lens has clean glass, but the focusing helical needs lube badly, and the aperture ring is so loose that it feels like it will fall off. Yet it produces fantastic results. It has a very pleasing and smooth quality to it.

-- Warren

4 Comments:

Blogger SteveR said...

Wow! Are you sure that's not a Summicron you mounted?? :-)

Beautiful photo - great colors and very sharp

Tuesday, March 1, 2005 at 9:10:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Thanks Steve. Of course, it's still a little earlier to have a firm conclusion, but for now, I would have to say that I'm more impressed with the J-8 then the CV 35mm Skopar. I think the Skopar needs to be stopped down to get max performance. I'll need further testing to be sure though.

Tuesday, March 1, 2005 at 9:40:00 AM PST  
Blogger martin said...

I suggest you shoot more with the Jupiter 50mm. I'm using a 50mm more. The 35s and 28s are good but I tend to get too much information in the frame and more depth of field.

Friday, March 4, 2005 at 10:26:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

This is SO interesting! I've been thinking a lot about this lately. I've also been favoring the 50mm focal length lately. It's back to the future because my very first serious camera, my old Nikomat FTn came with a 50mm f1.4, and that was around 35 years ago!

-- WT

Friday, March 4, 2005 at 10:31:00 AM PST  

Post a Comment


Spreckels Temple of Music (side view), Golden Gate Park, CV Bessa R, CV 35mm f2.5 Posted by Hello

This picture is from my test roll of Kodak UC100 film and the Bessa R. It's nothing spectacular, just one of a series of test shots. I uploaded a 300dpi file. I wanted you to see the resolution of the lens. There was a spot of flare on some of my shots. I think the front lens element had a smudge on it that I didn't notice until after I finished the roll. I hope that was the reason. I'll have to hurry up and finish my 2nd roll to see if the flare spot is gone.

Did you notice the pidgeon in flight in the picture?

-- Warren

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Voigtlander Bessa R, Back to Basics



Hi Gang,

In case some of you didn't know what I was talking when I mentioned that I just bought another rangefinder camera, here's a picture that I shot of it over the weekend. Ever since I borrowed Martin's Leica M2 in the mid-90's, I've been hooked on shooting with rangefinder cameras. Back then, I found what I thought was the perfect (RF style) camera, a Konica Hexar AF. It was the same size and shape as a Leica M, but had all features of a modern camera: AF, motorized film advance, AE, etc. And it had a fantastically good 35mm lens (non-interchangeable). Technically, it wasn't a true rangefinder because it was auto-focus, and so did not have a "real" rangefinder, but it had a traditional viewfinder layout with parallax compensated bright lines in the viewfinder. Since it lacked a real rangefinder, I could not accurately or conveniently focus the camera in manual mode. Eventually, the Hexar's limitations annoyed me enough to force me to sell the camera. Interestingly, the Hexar has gained a legendary status as a great street camera by virtue of its incredibly quiet shutter and excellent lens. My old Hexar, which was the original version that had the super-quiet silent mode, would be worth twice as much as I sold it for now. You can read more about the Hexar on Stephen Gandy's site:

Hexar article here

After I sold my Hexar, I was without a solid RF camera for a while. Over the last 7 or 8 years, I picked up some interesting vintage rangefinder cameras such as the Yashica Lynx 5000e, and the Yashica Electro 35 GSN.

Last year, I discovered the world of FSU (former Soviet Union) rangefinder cameras. These quaint and quirky cameras are a whole sub-specialty in themselves. The 3 that I have, 2 FED's and a Zorki, are very nice to shoot, and the Russian lenses are good performers. The problem is that these cameras are so old that they are not as reliable as I would like. They all need a good CLA that I don't have the time for right now.

Finally, I discovered the Voigtlander Bessa, a modern day throwback to all the rangefinder cameras that came before. The Bessa is made by the Japanese company, Cosina. I will refer you to an excellent website devoted to the camera, so I won't go into all the details again here. What I like about this camera is that it is all manual: focus, exposure, film advance, etc. It has a built-in, TTL light meter, and it uses LTM (Leica screw mount) lenses. The viewfinder is reputed to be as bright and clear as a Leica M series camera.

I've seen many people disparage the camera as feeling "cheap" because of the plastic top and bottom plates, and the rubberized back plate, but to me, it feels pretty nice. I also like the short throw of the film advance lever. My camera came with a Voigtlander 35mm f2.5 Skopar Classic lens. I also plan to use my Russian 50mm lenses on this camera. I just finished my first test roll, so I can't tell you the results yet. I managed to snag this camera and lens on Ebay for $320. The same combo is selling for $425 from Voigtlander's US distributor, so I think I got a great deal.

So why all the fuss about rangefinders? If you've never tried one before, you should. RF cameras force you to "see" the world a little differently than slr's. Because the camera does not have the pentaprism and mirror box of a SLR, the cameras are usually smaller, lighter, less conspicous, and quieter than SLR's. This makes RF cameras more suited to certain types of shooting then SLR's, such as PJ work, street shooting, travel, and certain types of portraiture where you need to get more up-close and intimate with your subject. Also because there is no mirror box to deal with, lens designers have more freedom to optimize the design of wide to superwide angle lenses (this was more important when designers did not have CAD).

You can read more about the Voiglander Bessa R at this excellent site: Bessa R Site.

Thanks for reading.

-- Warren

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Thursday, February 24, 2005


"Intrepid Photographer", Half Moon Bay, CA, Nikon D100, 24mm f2.8D. Posted by Hello

It was low tide at the tide pools near Half Moon Bay. Dolph, I'll bet you know exactly where this is :). Do you feel nolstagic?

I decided to make this black and white because there were a couple of orange cones in the shot, and the photographer's parka was blue. The colors distracted from the mood. I think it looks more "vintage" this way. What do you think?

-- Warren

2 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

This guy was braving the wind and cold to get some telephoto shots of some sea lions lying around on some rocks offshore.

As photographers, can you relate to this picture?

Does the composition do anything for you? I thought the x-shaped tidepool in the foreground made it interesting.

--Warren

Thursday, March 3, 2005 at 6:29:00 PM PST  
Blogger SteveR said...

I agree that this makes a really good B&W image - the B&W tones allow the composition to take precedence. The x-shaped tidepool - a good catch, Warren.

Thursday, March 3, 2005 at 9:34:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment

Monday, February 21, 2005


Spring Blossoms in San Mateo, Nikon D100, 24mm f2.8 Posted by Hello

We've had rain for the last 10 days in the SF Bay Area, and yesterday was gloomy and rainy. But the rain broke briefly during the afternoon. Right after lunch with some friends (Jill was there), we decided to walk to the Japanese Garden which was just a block away from the restaurant. Do you guys remember what I mentioned in one of my recent emails? So has anyone tried to get a spring blossom picture? I always have it in the back of my mind.

This was a true grab shot. We were walking across the street heading for the Japanese Garden when I saw this public path in front of me. I noticed the tree in bloom, and I began to size this up for a photo opportunity. I didn't have time to think for very long because I spotted the man walking down the path, and my friends were about to enter the scene from the left. I only had a split second to bring my camera up to my eye and snap the shutter before this scene would change forever. This was one case when I had to trust my camera's AF and AE.

So what do you think? Did this work, or is it too "busy".

-- Warren

4 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

I'm very interested in reading discussion about this. A friend answered offline that he thought the shot was good, but a little "busy". He offered that perhaps a closeup of the blooms would be better. I think that yes, a closeup of the blossoms would be a picture of some blossoms, but in my opinion, that's too common a shot.

That's why I brought up the subject of spring blossom shots recently. I find it challenging to make a "different" image. In this one, I felt that the gate in the foreground, and the man walking on the path, adds balance and context to the shot. In my previous cherry blossom pictures, I would shoot just the tree and the blossoms, but to me, that kind of shot doesn't hold enough interest.

Still curious as to what the group thinks.

--Warren

Thursday, March 3, 2005 at 6:18:00 PM PST  
Blogger martin said...

I gave this photo some thought and although the color is nice the picture does not hold up because of the black fence and the white column on the left. These elements detract from the color of the blossoms. I heard in a color class that significant areas of neutral colors such as black, white and gray basically lessens the effect of color in a photo. If you had more of the green grass and eliminated the fence and column the photo has a chance of working as green and magenta complement each other.

I have problems doing color myself as my training is in black and white. A lot of times when I look at a scene, I tend to look for the quality of light, form and composition rather than color. Maybe you are expecting too much, grab shots are hard to do and even more difficult in color.

Sunday, March 6, 2005 at 10:24:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Martin, thanks for your very interesting comments about color harmony. It's very thought provoking.

It's interesting that you think the shot failed based on analysis of the color. This is a concept that I have not thought much about lately(but probably should).

As for grab shots, that's a genre of photography that I find fun and interesting. The challenge is to get the best composition given the circumstances and timing. I don't expect that all grab shots will work, but when they do, it's very satisfying.

Tuesday, March 8, 2005 at 10:37:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Previously, I said, "This is a concept that I have not thought much about lately(but probably should)."

What I meant to say was that I didn't really look at this particular shot in that way. Gee, does that make sense?

I would love to hear from others about this.

--WT

Tuesday, March 8, 2005 at 11:01:00 AM PST  

Post a Comment

Happy Birthday to Warren!

Na-na-na-na-na-na... they say it's your birthday!

Many happy returns, Warren.

Best regards,
SteveR

Sunday, February 20, 2005


I was assigned to shoot a Johnny Mathis show in Redwood City. I was only allowed to shoot from behind the sound guys probably 150 feet away and only for 3 songs. I was worried about camera shake on the 80-200 zoom I was shooting with, so I was happy that I got anything at all. Most of the full zoom shots were unuasable. Posted by Hello

1 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

That's a nice shot given the difficult conditions. My wife and I went to his last concert in S.F. You captured the ambience of the event very nicely. I liked the fact that the audience can be seen at the bottom of the shot. It looked like he was slowly walking to his left. It would have been nice to have waited until he strolled in front of the black spot in the background. When you snapped this shot, there was some distracting objects behind his head. Also, since he is so far to the edge of this shot, the band is almost too dominant, making the shot more about the band, than about Johnny Mathis.

What ISO were you shooting at?

-- Warren

Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 10:52:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment


I had a chance to shoot the Chronicle's Carl Nolte for the CCSF magazine. He was a character. I used an off camera flass bounced off the window near him to boost the natural light. The D70 has a nice feature where the on camera flash will trigger my speedlight w/out adding light to the scene. Posted by Hello

7 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Thanks for posting Tony! The more I look at this picture, the more I like your composition. The shape and angle of the monitor in the foreground matches the shape and angle of the cubicle wall in the background. Mr. Nolte is perfectly positioned between these two elements. You also left enough of the background in place to establish that the subject was in his element (in the office). There's also very nice focus control, tack sharp on face and eyes, and everything else unobtrusively out of focus.

The lighting was also nicely done. There's just one thing that I want to note: I'm not sure if you intended it this way, but the image as a whole is a little dark on my screen. It could be brightened just a little bit.

-- Warren

Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 10:37:00 PM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Tony, you probably need to calibrate your monitor(s). I just did a very quick search and found this page where you can read about it... http://epaperpress.com/monitorcal/

Monday, February 21, 2005 at 10:26:00 AM PST  
Blogger Benson said...

This is one of those shots you see in the newspaper or magazine that captures the essence of a story. It's a great shot that captures the main person in the story (I would assume) in his working environment. Just enough of the background and foreground is shown to reveal his office but it is out of focus enough to not distract from the main subject, Mr. Nolte.

Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 12:35:00 PM PST  
Blogger martin said...

I disagree with Benson. I know Nolte from my days at SF State. I would not have photographed him at the paper. You should have taken him somewhere in the to associate him with San Francisco. Perhaps I have background information you are unaware of, but I would have done a little research on the subject. This is a photojournalism assignment, you and others here are a bit caught up with the technical aspects of photography.

Friday, March 4, 2005 at 9:13:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Martin,

Ouch, that was harsh, dude!

You have the benefit of having background information. I'm not familiar with the guy, so basically what I have left to comment on is my opinion of the composition and technical aspects of the image.

I loved your comment with the inside information, and for those shots that are supposed to be PJ style, we can really use your expert opinion.

--Warren

Friday, March 4, 2005 at 10:09:00 AM PST  
Blogger martin said...

Hmm, a bit harsh? If I was a photo editor at a newspaper or magazine, I would have made the exact comments that I did.

We are all still learning, and we learn best by shooting more. Sometimes the photos work and sometimes they don't.

Friday, March 4, 2005 at 10:38:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Point taken. But remember, we don't see the smile on your face when reading the comments online :).

Don't change a thing Martin, just keep commenting!

--WT

Friday, March 4, 2005 at 10:42:00 AM PST  

Post a Comment

Thursday, February 17, 2005


Snowy Riverbank, Merced River, Yosemite National Park, Feb. 2004, Nikon F4, Ilford XP2 Posted by Hello

The sensation of being there is very hard to describe. The words: ephemeral, fragile, and fleeting, come to mind. It was late afternoon, and the sun was already beginning to disappear from the valley. The light was fading, but what light there was, was soft yet crisp. It was quiet and cold, and the only sensation of noise and motion came from the slow, gentle flow of the Merced River.

This is why we keep going back to Yosemite, especially in winter.

I've always wanted to make a picture like this one. Because it's black and white, I had to spend a lot of time experimenting with different settings in Photoshop (channel mixing, contrast, brightness, etc.) to make it look the way I wanted. But the process was fun, and I hope you like the result.

I'm on the fence about C-41 (color process) black & white film. Have any of you tried it yet? At first, I didn't care for it because I didn't like the way the film looked under high magnification. I thought it had ugly grain (actually no grain, just ugly). I'm encouraged by this picture, however. I think I'll try some more of this film before I make a final judgement. What has been your experience with it?

-- Warren

3 Comments:

Blogger Benson said...

I would have to say I'm surprised that there are no additonal comments on this shot. I really like this one. I like the Ansel Adams-esque nature of the shot and the detail of the mountain in the background. The contrast of the snow and the trees and rock structure works well also. Great shot!

Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 12:31:00 PM PST  
Blogger SteveR said...

Yes, I agree with Benson, and I would have to use just about the same words - Adams-esque, etc.

Wonderful.

Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 7:40:00 PM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Thanks guys. It really means a lot to me when I get feedback (any kind, good or bad, it doesn't matter). I personally think that this is one of the best B&W pictures that I've ever made, and it's nice to know that someone else likes it too :)

Whenever things get rolling on FPCF, I get all pumped up and then I post too many pictures to FPCF. Maybe I should stop and let you guys post for a while.

-- Warren

Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 11:42:00 AM PST  

Post a Comment


"Window Walkers", Millbrae, CA, Nikon F4, Ilford XP2. Posted by Hello

Gail was at an orthotics/shoe store in Millbrae. While I was waiting for her, I was looking out the window at our car when I noticed the picture sign in the window. From my vantage point, they could have been right out there on the sidewalk :). This was taken just last year. I have not abandoned film. In fact, I just bought another film camera (another rangefinder, the Voitlander Bessa R), so you guys will likely see more film shots in the near future.

-- Warren

4 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

So, did this picture do anything for anyone? Or is it just too gimmicky and not worthy of posting? I thought it was cool, but it appears I may be the only one who thinks so :).

As you probably noticed by now, my subject and styles are all over the map. It's interesting for me to see which shots get a reaction and which are ignored.

-- Warren

Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 12:06:00 PM PST  
Blogger Benson said...

Sorry to say this picture did not do anything for me. That's why I did not comment on it.

Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 12:13:00 PM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Thanks Benson. No need to be sorry about it. We can't expect all our pictures to appeal to everyone.

It would be great to know why it didn't do anything for you. Was it because you simply weren't interested in the subject or style (i've heard this from others before)? Was it the composition? If so, how can it be improved? Would it work better in color?

-- Warren

Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 12:21:00 PM PST  
Blogger martin said...

I find this photo interesting. I look at it and it makes me think about what is going on in the scene. It is very different than other photos you make. I like the way the camera is tilted slightly down creating horizontal and vertical lines that are off axis. You should try to experiment more like this. Perhaps shooting with a rangefinder camera would change the way to look at scenes.

Friday, March 4, 2005 at 10:21:00 AM PST  

Post a Comment

Wednesday, February 16, 2005


GG Bridge Towers in Late Afternoon, Nikon F3HP, Ektachrome, circa mid-1990's. Posted by Hello

When seen in a "normal" view, the GG Bridge is so spectacular and well-proportioned that one does not really notice the immense size of the two towers. This angle shows that they are real "towers".

-- Warren

1 Comments:

Blogger Benson said...

I like this photo for its unique perspective and symmetry. Maybe being a dentist has really brainwashed me into appreciating symmetry.

Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 12:18:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment


Black Car Picture for Dennis, Lamborghini Diablo at Monterey, Nikon D100, Tamron 24-135mm @48mm, 1/250 f8. Posted by Hello

Cars are a favorite subject of mine! I can bore you guys silly with them :). Pictures of a car on grass is always good, no matter what color. The reflection of the sky cast a blue tint on this immaculately polished black Diablo.

-- Warren

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Tuesday, February 15, 2005


"Inside Looking Out", Sony DSC-D770, 1/8 f7, iso 100. Posted by Hello

This is our cat, Easy Life (that's her name), looking out our back window. I've always like this shot from 2001. I posted it to other forums previously, but I've reworked it to post here. I like the mood, and the theme (longing to be out in the world, but unable to go). This is one of those shots with "feeling" that I often wonder if other people feel the same way.

Since that old 1.5MP Sony dslr didn't have a mirror, I was able to successfully handhold it at slow shutter speeds.

-- Warren

2 Comments:

Blogger SteveR said...

Very cool! I like the way you have a monochrome "frame" with the inside, including your cat, surrounding the color outside view. I also like the way you turned the window into a trapezoidal shape - it leads the eye to the cat.

Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 4:57:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Thanks.

Did you notice that outside cat? :)

Correction: The DSC-D770 has a mirror, but it's fixed, so no mirror slap & vibration to deal with.

-- Warren

Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 10:04:00 AM PST  

Post a Comment

Sunday, February 13, 2005


Landmarks, San Francisco, Nikon D100, Tamron 24-135mm @ 75mm, 1/500 f11. Posted by Hello

This is another from my series shot on July 4th, 2003. I was at Pier 39 standing on a 2nd level walkway. I was looking down on a sea of humanity below. Then my eyes wandered up to see the top of the carousel with the familiar SF landmarks (Coit Tower & Transamerica Pyramid) behind it. I thought the carousel itself may become a landmark in SF, we'll Pier 39 certainly is.

Is this an interesting view, or ...just so-so?

-- Warren

5 Comments:

Blogger Dennis Fong said...

I would give it a "so-so" for the following reasons...because the carosel isn't yet a landmark, it feels too dominant in the photo. It takes over the image, while the known landmarks are dwarfed. Even though some may not be familiar with these two landmarks, they are very distinctive, and I believe they would be recognized as distinctive architechtural items immediately. The top of the carosel doesn't seem to have the interest power of the other landmarks, yet grabs for your interest by it's sheer size.

Monday, February 14, 2005 at 10:24:00 PM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Thanks for your thoughts. The carousel WAS my main subject, so it was meant to dominate the picture. To paraphrase Steve, who quoted Bart, I meant to do that :).

I agree, I think the carousel top may not be interesting enough on its own. That's what I was wondering. The background landmarks could have been positioned in a more interesting way too. I thought that the telephoto compression effect made them pop up sufficiently in the background to be interesting.

Next time, maybe I should bring a longer telephoto to for even more compression effect and concentrate on just one of the two, probably Coit Tower. (just thinking aloud)

I'll check that out when I go down to Pier 39 again.

-- Warren

Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 8:03:00 AM PST  
Blogger SteveR said...

I rather like it and find it an interesting perspective. Different strokes... ;-)

When I first saw it, I did get the impression "you meant to do that" in terms of making the carousel top your main subject.

You know me and how I love bold colors, so the colors of the carousel appeal to me.

Also, there's an abstraction on "tall" or "vertical structure" by the repetition of the peak of the carousel by the Coit Tower and TransAmerica Bldg.

I just read the last paragraph and I'm not sure I understand what I just said, but I'll let it stand in case it makes sense to anyone else ;-)

So I think it's good, even very good. I think your concept has the potential to be even better - if you would enjoy going back there anyway, maybe work the scene over - shifting your point of view to left, right... maybe even bring a stepladder to get some extra height.

Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 9:18:00 AM PST  
Blogger Benson said...

I also like the picture for the bright colors. I would be interested in a different perspective slightly off to the left so the main subject, Coit tower, and the Transamerica building are closer together. I think a more dramatic change would involve a dusk or dawn shot. But it would also change the whimsical nature of the picture.

Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 10:46:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Everyone, Thanks for all your wonderful comments and ideas. It's all good information. Hey, I just thought of something. Wouldn't it be cool if the moon was positioned right on top of the TA Pyramid, like the red ball on top of the carousel? Alternatively, anything positioned in the top right part of the picture would balance it a bit.

-- Warren

Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 2:31:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment

Thursday, February 10, 2005


Formal Portrait of Linus, Jan. 2004, Nikon D100, 50mm f1.8, 1/60 f3.5 Posted by Hello

People who know me know that I love cats. This opportunity presented itself when Linus struck an uncharacteristically formal pose. Linus is a big guy, but his owners are proud of his brilliant blue eyes. I got down and laid flat on my stomach to get this shot from ground level.

-- Warren

2 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

My Questions for this shot:

I normally don't like to center my subject like I did here, but in this case, I felt that centering was okay because of how his tail and legs were positioned. What do you think about this?

Also, I feel that the objects in the background are okay. They are not in sharp focus, and are dimmer than the main subject. They establish that Linus is at home in his environment. Do you agree with this? Or should I have blurred and/or darkened the background a little.

By the way, the on-camera flash worked well for this shot. It wasn't overpowering, and I was able to get a little backlighting on his fur.

-- Warren

Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 12:44:00 PM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

I was lying on my stomach waiting for Linus to look directly at the camera for about 3 or 5 minutes. He's a calm and mellow guy so he doesn't move that quickly.

I was expecting to do some photoshop work to remove the typical flamethrower reflections from his eyes, but it didn't happen. I think there was enough ambient light in the room to keep his pupils small (luckily). Plus, D100's built in flash is small and the flash was not very strong.

-- Warren

Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 2:25:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment

Wednesday, February 09, 2005


Altered Red Railings. Posted with Steve's permission. I took Steve's original, cropped, adjusted curves, heavy unsharp mask, then used the dry brush effect. At first, I was trying for a more subtle effect, but then I thought, "What the heck, might as well do it radical!". --Warren Posted by Hello

4 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Steve, I hope this wasn't too horrifying :) I tried adding photographic grain, but I felt that it didn't do what I wanted to the background railings. I chose to use the drybrush effect, and I dialed back on the brushstroke size to make it more subtle in the final version.

-- WT

Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 11:05:00 AM PST  
Blogger SteveR said...

Wow, really nice, Warren! It's totally different now, but more in line with what I *wanted* - more abstract. The drybrush technique is nice - not overdone at all. To my untutored eyes, the railings now look even more like Chinese characters, and even the shadows stand out more and add to the overall effect.

Thank you very much! You've inspired me to play with this image (and it's brother, shot at a smaller aperture a second or two later) this weekend.

Best regards,SteveR

Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 11:39:00 AM PST  
Blogger SteveR said...

... and I just thought to do this. Using the "Open Link in new window" right-click menu, I opened both Warren's version and my original version in separate windows, them sized them so that I could see them side-by-side. I encourage anyone interested to try this. Warren's improvements make the image much more "finshed"-looking and "clean" - those are the 2 words that come immediately to mind.

What do you think?

-- SteveR

Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 11:43:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

I must say that it was very interesting and fun to do this exercise. I tried to visualize what you were intending when you made the original picture. I'm glad that you like the result. Thanks for allowing me to edit your shot.

-- WT

Friday, February 11, 2005 at 5:30:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment


Umbrella Display at Publix, Atlanta Posted by Hello
Canon DR, 18-55mm zoom
1/30 @ f/7.1 ISO 400

NOT red, for a change!

Stopped at a Publix supermarket last Saturday morning to buy some yogurt and fruit for breakfast. I did a double-take on the way out just as I passed by this display and went out the door. I ran back around to the entrance and made my way back to this display, right by the exit, and snapped this one photo. I was immediately busted by two manager-type Publix employees and told that it was not allowed to take photos in the store. I played dumb and apologized, but kept the image ;-)

Slight cropping and contrast improvement, otherwise, this is pretty much how I saw it.

2 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Very Cute! Here are inanimate objects that look alive. Nice grab.

A similar thing happened to me last weekend. Gail wanted to show me a store downtown that had a very interesting desing. It's actually a classically designed former bank that was converted to an Armani store. There is a restaurant in the middle of the floor and the merchandise is located around the perimeter. I was shooting my Nikon F3HP w/Tri-x that day, and it would have been interesting to shoot some of the architectural details in there. I didn't even have a chance to bring my camera to my eye when an employee of the store walked over and told us that photography is not permitted in the store. I said, "Okay, no problem, I was just admiring the building's details, why can't I take pictures?" She answered, "Store Policy".

I later saw that she was taking pictures of the display arrangements as we left the store.

If they locate themselves in a historically significant building, maybe they should be more accomodating.

-- Warren

Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 7:40:00 AM PST  
Blogger Unknown said...

Very whimsical, this one made me smile. I like that the background ones are slightly out of focus, making the foreground group "pop."

Friday, February 11, 2005 at 6:18:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment

Can This Photo Be Saved?...


Untitled Posted by Hello
Canon Digital Rebel, EF-S 18-55mm
1/1000 @ f/6.3

I keep looking at this photo and thinking that their might be something to it... but I just don't know.

I like the red (of course!) and the perspective and the way the fellow at the bottom (my Cousin Brian) is standing. I must have Chinese New Year on the brain, because the railings suggest Chinese characters.

But I'm just not sure about this one. I can't even come up with a title.

What do you think? Does it do anything for you? (I won't be insulted if the answer is no ;-) Can you suggest any cropping or other manipulation to make it better?

... Or should this one be relegated for the virtual dustbin?

7 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Steve, this was a very interesting exercise. I would be curious to know what others think of this shot.

Have you ever shown it before? There is one fundamental flaw that kills it. Your main subject of interest is not completely in focus. This looks like a quicky grab shot(which is fine). Aperture should have been set smaller, maybe f16 or smaller. You're shooting wide angle, you don't need to be at 1/1000. If you had time to think about it, maybe you could have spun the control wheel on your camera to set the aperture smaller. That being said, I think the picture can still be somewhat saved. I pulled it into Photoshop to examine it further. I would put a tighter crop on it. There is too much space around the background railing, and in the foreground, the lower space, I felt, was not needed in the shot. The tighter crop would also crop out the second person, which didn't add anything to the shot. I increased contrast by adjusting the curves, and then used a high degree of unsharp mask.

After all these things were done, I felt it was an improvement, but the soft focus in the majority of the shot was still a slight annoyance. I normally don't like to add effects to a shot, but in this case, you might want to play around with adding some grain or brushstroke effect that kind of hides the focus problem and accentuates the railiing contrast.

I also don't like to post my version of another person's picture, unless specifically requested to do so, so I'll leave it at that.

That was fun!

Thanks for posting.

-- Warren

Wednesday, February 9, 2005 at 8:05:00 AM PST  
Blogger SteveR said...

Hi Warren,

Thanks for your extensive comments!

I just took this photo over the weekend, and other than my cousin, you guys are the first to see it.

Yes, please post your version - that would really be helpful to me.

Not to sound like Bart Simpson ("I *meant* to do that !), but I was actually looking for limited depth of field and focusing on the near railing, rather than Cousin Brian and Uncle Joe at the bottom of the stairs.

Meanwhile, I have a second photo shot at a smaller aperture - I'll post that one later this week for comparison.

I'm finding this tremendously useful - it's really useful to hear what other photophiles think.

Wednesday, February 9, 2005 at 8:58:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Steve, I did notice that the foreground railing was in sharp focus. The composition leads my eye from the sharp foreground railing, up the picture, to the rest of the railing. Just my opinion, but when this main subject is out of focus, it is disturbing to the eye. (at least it is to me)

Alternatively, if your foreground subject, the first railing, was composed in such a way as to be more dominant, then the eye would tend to focus more in the foreground, and be less disturbed by the out of focus area. OOF areas should probably be there to support the main subject, rather than be the main subject. So it would be okay for cousin Brian to be OOF.

...still curious to hear other opinions on this.

-- Warren

Wednesday, February 9, 2005 at 9:41:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

By the way, i forgot to mentin that I like the idea that the railing looks like Chinese characters. They do!

-- Warren

Wednesday, February 9, 2005 at 9:45:00 AM PST  
Blogger Dennis Fong said...

I would agree pretty much with Warren's comments, so I will not duplicate here. As far as composition, since it is somewhere you may be able to get back to, I would probably try to use the bold close railing as a frame for the other railings and human subjects. Perhaps a lower perspective through the "square" of the near railing might work?

Monday, February 14, 2005 at 10:06:00 PM PST  
Blogger Dennis Fong said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Monday, February 14, 2005 at 10:06:00 PM PST  
Blogger Dennis Fong said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Monday, February 14, 2005 at 10:07:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment

Tuesday, February 08, 2005

Saturn V rocket


saturnv
Originally uploaded by bhwong.

OK, I'll try to get the ball rolling for those of us who are just voyeurs of fine photographs.

I took this at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida when we were there in October. You have to go through a video presentation before getting to see the rocket itself, which made you appreciate seeing it in person so much more. It was an impressive sight that no amateur photographer could completely capture. So I just tried getting some interesting perspectives. Taken with a Nikon D70 at 18mm on 18-70mm lens, 1/60, f3.5.

4 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

This reminds me of a scene from the sci-fi movie, like the Terminator. Or as Jill mentioned offline, the rocket motor looks like a giant industrial chemical vat. Very cool. Too bad there wasn't a person standing next to it so that we can see how huge it really is.

Thanks for posting!

--Warren

Tuesday, February 8, 2005 at 4:01:00 PM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

I don't want to misquote Jill.

She actually said, "looks like a high tech funnel in a chemical factory!".

I hope you don't mind that I quoted you, Jill

-- Warren

Tuesday, February 8, 2005 at 4:07:00 PM PST  
Blogger SteveR said...

I really like this image, Benson! Since I grew up during the race to the moon, this is a familiar object that brings back good memories, but you've photographed it in a way I've never seen.

I especially like the composition and the patterns. To me, there is a strong graphic feel due to the triangles or "chevron" patterns in the image: The openings of the 3 rocket nozzles form a very flattened triangle at the top of the photo. Then there are the bolting patterns on the bottom of the fuel tank - to me, they form two chevrons pointing towards the bottom of the photo, and two more pointing to the center nozzle.

Finally, there is the arc of the circular bolting pattern that ties it all together.

So to me, very nice at both the literal and graphic level!

Best regards,
SteveR

Wednesday, February 9, 2005 at 9:19:00 AM PST  
Blogger Unknown said...

Normally I am turned off by symmetry but it really works in this case. It makes exaggerates the geometry of the patterns and adds to the scientific, science fiction feel of the venue. Plus, the camera is slightly angled which keeps my brain occupied trying to straighten out the image. I like it.

Friday, February 11, 2005 at 6:22:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment


Under Steve's Influence, Saw Red, Nikon D100, Tamron 24-135mm @ 48mm, 1/250 f8 Posted by Hello

Notes: I knew I could find a "red" shot somewhere in my catalog of pictures :) Yes! for Chinese New Year, a RED picture, but it's from an Italian car :) It's the hood of a vintage Alfa Romeo built by Ferrari. It looks like a reflection, but one side of the hood is raised.

-- Warren

2 Comments:

Blogger SteveR said...

Was this taken in 2002 (Year of the Horse?)

Beautiful colors and composition - very nicely isolated the logo and hood shape as design elements.

Tuesday, February 8, 2005 at 9:26:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

You guys are right, this WOULD have been a good shot for the year of the Horse. That was in 2002. This was taken at the Stanford Concours, in Palo Alto, California in June of 2003.

-- Warren

Tuesday, February 8, 2005 at 1:52:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment

A Nice Jewish Boy Wishes You Happy Chinese New Year!&


Gonghé Xinxi! Posted by Hello
Canon Digital Rebel
Canon EF-S 18-55mm
1/60 @ f/6.3, ISO 400

Wishing you togetherness and good fortune for the New Year. I hope I didn't leave out any important diacritical marks on the transliterated "happy new year" greeting that I found on the web ;-)

I was looking for something bright red (of course!) to shoot in honor of Chinese New Year. This is part of a Chinese-style panel at Atlanta Zoo near the Panda exhibit - I had to crop very tightly to avoid the part that says "Coca-Cola Company" just off-camera to the right.

The Rosenbach family will celebrate Chinese New Year with, of course, Chinese food! For a comment on the strange and wonderful love affair between the American Jewish community and Chinese food, see this blog post.

1 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Nice shot, with just a hint of something Asian.

Since we are Cantonese, we say it this way:
Gung Hay Fat Choy!

Thanks for the New Years wishes.

-- Warren

Tuesday, February 8, 2005 at 10:31:00 AM PST  

Post a Comment

Saturday, February 05, 2005


Groomsman Candid, July 2004, Nikon F4, Nikkor 50mm f1.4, Kodak Tri-X ISO 400, Did not record settings. Posted by Hello

Notes: Okay, time to change the genre on you guys :) I was asked to shoot candids at Kent & Glenda's wedding (Gail's cousin). So I asked them what they wanted. They both like "photojournalistic" style. Since they already hired a pro to shoot the "standard" stuff, I was free to shoot whatever candids that I wanted, and I was to shoot digital. But since I knew that they liked PJ style, I decided to bring a 2nd body (film body) loaded with b&w film. I was able to grab a bunch of shots before and during the ceremony with my F4 using available light. Interestingly, they both really liked these film shots. You can't easily duplicate the "look" of Tri-X with digital.

I grabbed this shot of Jay, one of the groomsmen just before the ceremony started. This was one of their favorites.

-- Warren

1 Comments:

Blogger Unknown said...

Great grab - For me, the play between the incredibly full rose and that smile make the photo.

Friday, February 11, 2005 at 6:24:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment

Friday, February 04, 2005


Sunoco Abstract Posted by Hello
Canon Digital Rebel, Sigma 70-300mm
f/5.6 @ 1/100 ISO 800

I kept going by this gas station, day after day, seeing this pattern, until I couldn't stand it anymore. So I schlepped my camera along the next day, switched to the long zoom, and made the Homeland Security people wonder why I was taking pictures of "infrastructure."

This was just before we left to visit my wife's family for Christmas, and I forgot about this image until I caught up on my CD-ROM burning last night.

4 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Steve,

Nice Pattern! I know what you mean about passing by a particular every day and seeing a potential picture. There is a location that I drive by every day, twice a day, that is at a local lake (Lake Merced) where I see a great shot potential. The time and season would have to be just right in order to get what I envision from it. One day, I was out testing my new 85mm prime lens, and I had to walk to that spot to do some test shots. The pictures came out okay, but it wasn't the right set of conditions to be perfect.

So, do any of you want to see that test shot? It may take years for me to get to that ideal situation. If you'd like, I can post it so that you all can get a general idea of what I saw in that location.

On to this picture. I see that you were at the limits of handhold-ability, but if you had a tripod handy, maybe you could have expanded the depth of field to include the first 3 pump stations. At first, I was thinking that the whole image should be in focus, but upon further reflection, I think that it would be okay for the lights to be a little fuzzy. My 2nd idea would be to crop out the 4th pump station and the signs from the bottom of the picture. The triple stations with the triple lights, IMO, might be a little more harmonious and even more abstract than it is now.

Maybe if you go back to that spot with your tripod, the Homeland Security people will be waiting for you :)

-- Warren

Friday, February 4, 2005 at 10:45:00 AM PST  
Blogger SteveR said...

Thanks for your comments, Warren - I was indeed on the ragged edge - below, actually, of where I should have been handholding the lens. It was a really dull morning, and I'm going to go back and try again on a sunnier day.

Your ideas about getting rid of the signs and the 4th pump make sense - isolating it to 3 pumps, 3 lights would make a better composition.

I may also try some Photoshopping to remove the extra elements.

Regards,
SteveR

Monday, February 7, 2005 at 5:44:00 PM PST  
Blogger SteveR said...

Thanks, Jill - actually, I sometimes tilt the camera to see what it brings about - your idea is excellent!

-- SteveR

Tuesday, February 8, 2005 at 12:02:00 PM PST  
Blogger Unknown said...

I also like the partial 4th pump. I think it kind of hints that the pattern could go on forever. It would worth trying again at a different angle to get rid of the signs although, they don't bother me that much. When I shoot a pattern like this, I try to put the focus on the second object instead of the first, just gives it a different look.

Friday, February 11, 2005 at 6:28:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment

Thursday, February 03, 2005


Juggler with Dog, July 4th, 2003, Nikon D100, Tamron 24-135mm @ 85mm, 1/180 f7 Posted by Hello

Notes: Gail and I have a tradition on July 4th where we walk down to the Fisherman's Wharf area. On July 4th, there are lots of musicians, street artists, food vendors, live bands, and lots of people. You never know what you'll find.

In this shot, I love the amazed expression of that woman in the center of the picture. :) And how about that little boy...what's he thinking?

-- Warren

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Wednesday, February 02, 2005

Seeing Red


Camp Car Windows - B&O Railroad Museum, Baltimore Posted by Hello
Canon Digital Rebel
Canon EF-S 18-55mm @ 30mm
1/50 sec @ f/8, ISO 400

Can you tell that I really enjoy having lots of red in my photos?

This image is of a Pullman coach at the B&O Museum - after many years of passenger service, B&O turned it into a "camp car," which I think is a term used to denote a piece of rolling stock reserved for the railroad's own use - as a rolling office, for example.

3 Comments:

Blogger Benson said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 7:42:00 PM PST  
Blogger Dennis Fong said...

I see the red theme. You must have LOVED Kodachrome 25! I like how you isolate your subject matter in all of your images, leaving no doubt what the viewer should focus on.

Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 8:53:00 PM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Red is good, especially around Chinese New Year :)

I like this version better than the one on your photoblog because in this one, you expanded the view to include the second window (the one on the right). The reflection in that window tells me immediately that this is a railroad car. I like that perfect symmetry of the bolts too, and of course, the rich color.

-- Warren

Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 7:15:00 AM PST  

Post a Comment