Sunday, June 28, 2009
4 Comments:
- Eric said...
-
All the leaves are brown, and the sky is gray...
- Warren T. said...
-
I've been for a walk
On a winters day... - Warren T. said...
-
I think you framed it nicely :). The fence gave it a vignetted look, kind of like looking back to the good old days. The shot is of the back of the car, as if you were chasing a bygone era.
This looks like a '57. I don't think it was called a "Nomad" anymore by '57, right? This is just a regular wagon by then.
--WT - Eric said...
-
It does have that old time look because of the vignetting. If you get a chance, try a B&W or sepia version and see what you get. You'll get that old time root beer feeling I'm sure.
4 Comments:
- Ted M said...
-
Warren, these are very nice b/w images of Yosemite!
- Steve Rosenbach said...
-
I really like the sunlit trunk with all of the shaded trees leading to it
- Warren T. said...
-
Thanks for the comment, guys! :)
I'm starting to get used to working with Kodak 400CN.
--WT - dan in marin said...
-
Warren, I like the shaded foreground, because it sets off the meandering path.
Dan
Saturday, June 27, 2009
1 Comments:
- Steve Rosenbach said...
-
Don't know what it's called (but I'd sure like to know) but it's a very, very nice image!
Great compostion and a very attractive subject to boot!
Pump Station?
2 Comments:
- Steve Rosenbach said...
-
>>Was I successful?<<
Yes! I like it! The juxtaposition of the wild, random plant growth with something so rectilinear and manmade is very cool. It works well in B&W. Very compelling.
I call this sort of photo "rust, rot, and decay" - and I've seen a lot of really excellent images of this type - often at abandoned mental institutions or prisons. - dan in marin said...
-
Right Warren. The water is pumped to the highest elevation in the park (Stow Lake) from wells located in the west end. Gravity then is used to move water throughout the irrigation and lakes thoughout the park. Acutally, only the chain of lakes is technically natural. They were more like seasonal or vernal water systems. I have attached a photo from the turn of the century that shows the portals in the background. It was from a "fashion shoot" back then.
Dan
Thursday, June 25, 2009
Paying it Forward, Take Two
I would like to give this camera to someone who will actually use it. I am offering it here first to see if any of you want it, or know of someone who is interested in using a film camera. The camera is a vintage Nikon FM. I had it checked out by a professional repairman, and the camera is performing to within factory specifications. I also had him replace all the light seals at the same time, so this camera is ready for action! All functions work on the FM, and the only obvious flaw on the camera is a slight dent/malformation in the prism housing, which does not affect functionality at all. This is the story of how I acquired the FM almost two years ago:
The lens that I am giving with this camera is not the lens in the picture. I am giving a Vivitar 28-70mm f3.5-4.8 Macro Zoom. This lens uses a 52mm filter, and the glass is pristine, and focusing action is smooth. The only fault of the lens is in the push-pull zoom action, which is extremely stiff.
The batteries are not included, and if you are not local, you'll pay for shipping cost.
Let me know if you are interested.
--Warren
Picture of Camera:
6 Comments:
- Steve Rosenbach said...
-
oooooooooooh! A beautiful *black* Nikon FM! I would love to have this one, but I don't want to be a pig, as Warren already gave me a very nice chrome FM earlier this year.
How about I send the chrome FM to the 2nd person who answers in exchange for this one? The chrome FM has a very sharp Nikon 50mm f/1.8) (I have a 2nd 50mm lens from a Nikon EM).
BTW, I meant to report this before - the Walgreens film I bought when I was in SF was extremely grainy- I'll post some of the scans soon, but it because of the film, it didn't show off the FM's abilities. - I have some new FM photos taken on Kodak Gold ISO 200 that I will develop and scan soon.
Best regards,
SteveR - Warren T. said...
-
Hey Steve, this is guilt-free GAS satisfaction, :) LOL!
If you really want the black FM, I'll send it to you, and you can find a local photographer or student to take (and use) the chrome FM if nobody here wants it. Or you can just keep both!
Let's wait a little while to see if anyone else is interested.
--Warren - Warren T. said...
-
oh yeah, thanks for the report on the Walgreens film. I was always curious to try some. Was it the ISO 400 stuff?
--WT - Steve Rosenbach said...
-
Thanks Warren!
>> guilt-free GAS satisfaction<<
;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-)
>>If you really want the black FM, I'll send it to you, and you can find a local photographer or student to take (and use) the chrome FM if nobody here wants it.<< Yeah, I'd love to have the black one - and that's a great idea to give away the chrome FM to a deserving person! I'm sure I can find one. - as you say, let's wait a while to see other responses,though.
The Walgreens film was ISO 200 - you CAN'T BELIEVE the grain!! I think it was defective - I can't imagine any film being this bad ;-)
Sandy wanted a scanner, so I just got an Epson V500 - it's supposed to do a very good job on 35mm film - so I'll try rescanning some earlier negs from the FM that Ritz scanned at 1700x1000 - they should be fine.
Thanks again,
SteveR
P.S. - when I was in SovCam mode, I used to always shoot Fuji 100 or 200 print film. This is the stuff you can buy at Rite-Aid or CVS (or usually, even Walgreens or many supermarkets) - I'd often find it at less than $1 a roll with a coupon. It worked fine. I think the last place I got it from was a Ritz Camera store. - Warren T. said...
-
i had the misfortune of shooting some expired Kodak Max 400 and 800, and it was the some of the worse film that I ever used. The colors were murky and grain was pronounced and ill defined. A true waste of effort.
i want to try some Ektar 100. I see examples posted on other forums, and I'm very impressed by the look of that film.
I've been shooting Fuji Superia Xtra 400, and I've gotten good results from it.
--WT - Ted M said...
-
I used to use Walgreens 200, and you could tell from the box whether it was Fuji or Agfa (now probably Fuji).
However, if you browse around the film forums, you'll likely find much better film at or below the prices of the Drugstore films.
My last film purchases were at < $1.00 per roll for Reala 100, and a couple of versions of Kodak Portra.
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Monday, June 22, 2009
Boom Lift Convention
Nikon D100, Tamron 24-135mm
5 Comments:
- dan in marin said...
-
Warren, I like the mechanical storks
Try this link for a sensor cleaning kit. Simple, local company and cheap. Be sure to use the pec pads, I also use the product for my lenses
http://www.copperhillimages.com/shopping/pgm-more_information.php?id=3 - Ted M said...
-
Hi Warren, I have a kit from micro-tools.com but so far have been lucky enough to just get everything off with the included Rocket blower in their kit, and haven't needed the pads and eclipse fluids.
- Warren T. said...
-
Thanks for the info. I have never had the sensor cleaned since I bought the D100 new many years ago. I've been getting by with using a blower. Actually, I bought a Rocket blower for this purpose recently. I think I'll try it again to see if it still helps, but now I have a couple of sources for the swabs if necessary.
--WT - Lea said...
-
makes me think of those robot wars shows... like they're about to battle it out and bust each other up!
- Eric said...
-
I really like these photos. Great composition and it's just a neat shot. Coming across that must've been a nice surprise.
Sunday, June 21, 2009
6 Comments:
- Eric said...
-
Cool photo, Dan. One of my favorite things to see in my yard is bees hanging around the lavender. Don't see too many macro shots on photo blogs (at least the ones I see).
- Warren T. said...
-
Hi Dan, this is a very nice macro shot :). I like the lavender tone of the whole image, very pleasing. Did you do much post-processing? I think it is a little too subdued. I did a quick "auto brightness" on a downloaded copy of this, and the resulting image had some added "punch" to it. I was then able to notice more details in the picture. The bee became more noticeable too.
I would also experiment with a square format for this shot, isolating the two lavender buds a little more and cropping out some of the extraneous leaves.
--WT - dan in marin said...
-
Thanx Eric
Warren
The photo was overexposed and I moved the histogram to the left 3/4 of a stop to duplicate the true color of the lavender bracts. You hit the nail on the head, I should have fiddled with the brightness instead.
I did not crop it because I was so enamoured with the color, perhaps it does detract from the been and the in focus flowers.
Thanx
Dan - Ted M said...
-
Hi Dan,
I think what would make this a more interesting photo is if only the bee were in focus. - Warren T. said...
-
Ted, it would be tricky to isolate the bee using DOF, given that the bee and the two flowers are in the same plane of focus :).
BTW, Dan, for posting to the web, you may want to convert your image to SRGB otherwise the image may appear a little muted.
If you'd like I can post a copy of your picture that I took a few minutes adjust.
--Warren - Lea said...
-
ooo so pretty! i love the petals, having both in and out of focus :) bzz
Saturday, June 20, 2009
Dan in Marin
I have been using a Digital SLR now for about three years (Canon 5D MK I) and continue to practice and try to capture what I see, sometimes it works and obviously most of the time "ack".
I currently, work in SF and live in West Marin so I shoot a lot of landscapes and macro flowers. I am just retiring from a 35 year career in horticulture/arboriculture and hope to start a BFA or MFA program in photography. Although, I consider myself strictly an amateur, I am enthusiastic and hope to hone my skills. Hopefully, by sharing some of my shots I can learn from you all. I met Warren through his wife Gail (we work together) and look forward to posting some of my work. I truly appreciate the broad spectrum of great work posted on the forum.
Dan
Labels: Bio and 1st Post
7 Comments:
- Lea said...
-
Hurray --looking forward to seeing your flower macros :) I love those too!
- Steve Rosenbach said...
-
Hi Dan,
Welcome to the blog! - Warren T. said...
-
Hi Dan,
Thanks for posting your into/bio here. I was wondering if there was a reason why you chose to use f22 on this shot?
Also, I'm not familiar with Canon, is the 5D MkI a full frame camera?
thanks,
WT - dan in marin said...
-
Hello everyone, looking forward to sharing and learning from you all.
Warren, the 5d is a full frame. I originally had a significant amount of foreground very close to the lens in the shot and decided it was not adding anything. I used f22 to keep the relatively close area within the DOF. Is there another technique to use if I wanted a distant shot and close foreground in DOF? - Warren T. said...
-
Dan, I was asking about your usage of f22 because on a digital sensor, usage of small apertures may result in diffraction issues (loss of sharpness). You must have had something very close in the foreground? F22 would give you a DOF of around 5 ft to infinity on a 40mm, right?
--Warren - dan in marin said...
-
Warren, you are right about the DOF, but I was not aware of a lack of clarity or sharpness from a lens stopped all the way down. I am familiar with soft corners when a lens is opened all of the way. I will have to experiment and see if f18 vs f22 is discernable.
thanx - Warren T. said...
-
Dan,
Read the articles below (don't forget to read the linked sample articles on digilloyd too):
http://diglloyd.com/diglloyd/free/Diffraction/index.html
http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/diffraction-photography.htm
--Warren
Friday, June 19, 2009
1 Comments:
- Eric said...
-
This is a nice shot of Half Dome. The contrast is nice. Reminded me of the contrast that Ansel Adams used.
Thursday, June 18, 2009
5 Comments:
- Steve Rosenbach said...
-
I *LOVED* these guys when you took me here, Warren! This is an especially good image - I tried and tried, but I didn't get a single good one while I was there. I like the "twofer" in the foreground and the out-of-focus gull interloping on the right!
- Warren T. said...
-
Thanks Steve. When I went with you that day, I didn't have a long enough lens with me, so I didn't bother taking any shots. I went back the next day with Gail and I brought my Nikkor 300mm f4.5.
--WT - said...
-
Posted for Dolph:
This is great! Just don't tell me you hand held the camera.
Sent from my iPhone - Warren T. said...
-
Dolph,
Actually, I did handhold the camera, but I braced it with my elbows on the railing :).
--Warren - Warren T. said...
-
Steve, I just realized that you were recently in Dolph's neck of the woods (Ft. Lauderdale area). You guys could have hooked up! Oh well.
--WT
Friday, June 12, 2009
David & Cristina
4 Comments:
- Steve Rosenbach said...
-
Hi Warren,
Haha - this is great - what an expression - and such a nice contrast to her serious expression. I'll bet that was indeed visualizing popping the question. Very nice "photojournalism" here - this would be a great image for a series on David & Christina. - Ted M said...
-
Great story behind the photo Warren. I think your J8 is sharper than mine. Are you doing much pp on your J8 photos? Seems like you have a very good one there!
- Warren T. said...
-
Thanks for the comments, guys, they are very much appreciated. I often question the popular belief that a RF camera is more suitable for getting shots like this, but nevertheless, I probably had the right tool for the situation that morning. The Bessa was suitably unobtrusive, and shot acquisition was very quick. I had already pre-focused and metered, and I just waited for the right moment to bring the finder to my eye to release the shutter. I chose a wider aperture to slightly emphasize the focus on Cristina. Fortunately, we were sitting with our backs to the window, so my subjects had good lighting on them.
Ted, I only do very minimal PP for these shots because the inferior Walgreens scans do not stand up to too much editing. I almost always apply USM to my images in varying degrees to compensate for some sharpness loss due to scanning, resizing, and other factors. I did get lucky and got a good J-8 example. It came on a Zorki-4. After my first rolls through the Zorki, I already decided to find a more reliable body to use with the J-8, and I ended up with my Bessa R.
The J-8 is my favorite of all my LTM lenses, and is one of my favorite 50mm lenses. The jury is still out as to whether or not the Elmar 50mm f2.8 will de-throne the J-8 in my experience because I have not had a chance to use the Elmar very much. Oh, and there's one more 50mm that I have not had time to try, the FSU Elmar clone that I got recently from Steve R.
--Warren - Eric said...
-
I think the man looks a little worried. Hmmm...
Thursday, June 11, 2009
Friday, June 05, 2009
Thursday, June 04, 2009
Leica M8 mini-review
The body feels much more solid than the other digital rangefinder, the Epson RD-1, and has a larger sensor. It's about the same size as a film M body, which is quite compact, especially coupled with a small lens. The shutter is noticeably quieter than an SLR, but about the same as a film M. The latest firmware update allows the use of coded or uncoded lenses, and with or without UV/IR filters. I have UV/IR filters for all of my M lenses except for 2, but haven't seen the need for them, and have primarily been shooting in color mode. The filters might be a good idea if you plan to shoot black synthetics in color, and coding of ultra wide lenses (< 28mm) might have an effect on vignetting, but so far 28mm uncoded, and without filters has not been a problem for me.
What slows me down with this camera (as well as most digital cameras) is that I have to go into the menus to change WB and ISO, there is no dedicated dial for these functions. Also to view the histogram, you have to press a display/info. button instead of having the histogram overlay the main image by default. But other than these minor issues, the camera takes great photos and has less of a crop factor than the Epson (1.3 vs 1.5 for the Epson). I've been using the following lenses with the M8 - Canon, 28/2.8, Summicron 35/2, CV 40/1.4, Summilux v2 50/1.4, and Summilux 75/1.4 (which this photo was taken with, at ISO 640, f1.4, 1/20th second). One feature that is faster than the Epson is AE lock, which is just pressing down the shutter half-way like focus lock on an AF DSLR.
The M8 has the same # of megapixels as my DSLR, but my DSLR images pale in comparison to the images from the M8. Could be the lenses, but the DSLR (mine is the smallest available) with it's big mirror slapping prism and shutter, extra high contrast colors, and gobs of molded cheap plastic, make the small M8 with faster and smaller prime lens a much more enjoyable tool.
5 Comments:
This is a nice shot. I like the way the lights reflect off the car. It loks like a star field. Was this car on the recent Star Trek movie by any chance? Sure looks like it. Good composition. Too bad there was the guy on the left. My eyes still gravitate towards the car though. Nice colors and shape.
Nice shot, really highlights the exotic shape of the car. ($1.5M price tag, tops out at 250+mph, yikes!)
ditto re: the guy walking in the background, if you only could have held your itchy trigger finger for just a few more seconds until the walked out of the frame :).
--WT
It's that guy!! Just...just...use the healing brush and heal him outta there!
Actually, Dolph, the guy in the background is not very noticeable because of the dark suit, and I think it would be too much of a chore to remove him. It's probably not worth the effort required, unless you just want to some Photoshop practice.
--WT
That guy was determined to be in the photo. He just kept walking around in circles behind the car.
Post a Comment