Flaggler College
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0673/b067337806c68b194485b18b278a53a5c496f795" alt=""
We are a small group of friends with a common love of photography. We hope to enjoy each others' work and to broaden our knowledge of photography and to stimulate our creativity by sharing our work and ideas here. Please invite your friends to stop by. If you are interested in becoming a photo contributor, please send me an email. --Warren
Great photo, man. Looks like something out of a sci-fi film. I like it.
Eric
Dolph, nice lines and symmetry in this one. It was hard to make out the contrasting colors, maybe need to bump up the saturation a bit? Otherwise it looks very monochromatic.
BTW, everyone, in your picture posts, please try to label the picture (it's like an index) to make it easier to find in the future. I've been going back to my posts to update the labels (tedious, but IMO, well worth the time and effort).
--WT
I *really* like this one, Dolph - good eye!
Warren,
I misstated, it only had two colors...black and white.
Labels: Baltimore, Canon A630, Cityscape, Inner Harbor
i like the red life vest "element". it does add to the composition. However, even though the photo is titled: Oat Rentals, just my opinion, but the large letters on top take too much attention from the rest of the photo. I would either crop out half of the letters, or the entire sign from the photo. I like how the red vests balance and complement the neon sign. The expression and posture of the figure is really nice for a candid shot.
Looks like a picture from one of the the island man. You seem to have captured the attitude of the islands. Nice Pic and good use of contrasting.
Steve, thank for posting the 2nd version. I like it a lot! Let us know how the "Island Man" likes his picture.
--WT
When I read about this art form, they always come back to "keep it simple." I like the second composition better. The original was attempting to tell two stories. This has one, and gives me the feeling of being at the docks ready to go fishing.
Labels: Architecture, Baltimore, Beatles, Bromo Tower, Canon A630, Composition, Silhouette
At first glance, i thought this WAS the Palazzo Vecchio :). Then I noticed the modern structure next to it.
Just my opinion, but perhaps this one is just a smidge too dark? Maybe dodge some of the highlights, like the very top of the curved shape to accentuate it.
--WT
Thanks, Warren - I wondered that myself. I pulled it off of Ben's camera a lunch today at work, and there I only have Picassa - I'll try some more subtle manipulation in PSE at home.
Steve, i viewed the picture on a different monitor, and tried changing angles, etc. on the original monitor, and my opinion now is that it's fine the way it is. Not too dark after all. :)
--WT
Steve,
While we are here on the east coast we want to get to Europe and see some of the great sites similar to this. Like Warren I would like to see more of the details, but the darkness hides them. Did you do this on purpose?
Hi Dolph,
Yes, I darkened it on purpose, hoping to emphasize the shapes and the contrast between the 1911 and the 1964 architecture.
Also, the Holiday Inn itself is not very good-looking in detail ;-)
Labels: Architecture, Baltimore, Canon, Composition
It definitely worked for me, Steve. Nice one!
BTW, maybe I should go back to our posts to add labels. It makes for a handy way to access our material.
--WT
I'm a little surprised by the noise level. You would think that a near-full frame image taken at ISO 80 should be pretty noise free. Maybe this is partly due to compression level, or resizing method? Just wondering.
--WT
OK...I don't hear a thing...
I love architectue. Thanks for the wonder shot with all the angles.
Nice composition Dolph!
did you get any shots of the outside of the lighthouse?
did you buy a 24mm prime lens?
--WT
If I didn't know you were looking down, I'd say you were taking a photo of the Time Tunnel. Good composition and I like the contrast of dark darks and light lights.
Eric
I just took another, closer look at this picture and I saw something that I missed the first time, people in the picture :).
That was a fun "discovery".
--WT
Take a look again....a blue glow...a spirit? I didn't see it when I took the picture, and other pictures during the day didn't have the blue glow....but it is in this picture and one other show.
The lighthouse does have a ghost, according to the tales.
Dolph, I actually saw the "spirit" the first time I looked at the picture. I was going to mention that you got some flare in the shot, but then I thought it was strange looking for a flare spot because I don't see an obvious light source that might have caused a lens flare. So I just didn't mention it. Hmmm, it's probably a spirit...
--WT
Ok.... I applied for a job in Sunnyvale...the search to come home has started.
Thanks keep sending the pics.
Good luck, Dolph!
The composition that includes the benches is very nice. Makes you wonder what kind of medical treatment you are getting...stinkie?
I really like this picture :)
The colours seem to go together with those wobbly shapes so well :P
Looks a little like the trip life takes us on, different directions at the beginning only to go straight later in life. Very nice warren!
Interesting shadow work, Eric.
The B&W shot is interesting because the B&W building looks like something from old photo, however, the composition looks modern (to me, anyway).
The 2nd photo looks familiar, like I've seen this idea before either here on our blog or on some other online place. I think the unexpected lightpost shadow adds an interesting, whimsical element to the shot.
--WT
Hey Warren. I agree with you. The b&w building does look old but not the composition. Perhaps someone did this before. It's across from 44 Gough.
Hi Eric, to me the composition seems not only modern, but also not a common one, which can be good.
Seems kind of like a tight crop, where you're actually looking for something in the windows or something with a long tele?
There is a fascinating book about a late NY b&w hobby photographer (his photos were taken with SLRs, and he seemed to be a pretty good city landscape photographer):
http://www.amazon.com/Angels-World-Photographs-Angelo-Rizzuto/dp/0393061116
a local library probably has it, check it out! The story of the guy itself is fascinating.
Thx Ted. I wasn't looking for a tight crop, but I guess it did come out that way.
Urban photography is very interesting as I studied design in the past and I like architecture. I may check out the book you listed.
Eric
Labels: Black and White, Cityscape, Ilford XP2, Nikon FM
The duck is camera shy!
Nice exposure on the rainbow shot. Did you have to adjust in PS at all, or did the camera nail it?
The fountain/walkway shot has a nice zigzag pattern that holds visual interest.
--WT
The duck was actually doing a motion like a dog does to scratch behind his ear! I guess the duck was itchy, too?
The camera got the rainbow shot pretty close to the way you see it. I just used the highlight slider in Picassa to lighten the darkest parts a bit, and it also brightend the rainbow
The fountain is a nice piece of urban architecture - you can walk under parts of it and see out through a curtain of water.
The duck reminds me of a paparazzi weary celebrity :).
--WT
I like the duck photo the best. It looks like it's trying to avoid a photograph!
That duck pic is so funny :P
Seems like there's a blue theme to the shots!
Labels: Black and White, Ilford XP2, Nikon FM
Have you noticed my double-barreled shooting on Treasure Island? :)
I was using both cameras(Nikon D100 & Nikon FM), slinging one over my shoulder while I was shooting with the other, then swapping when the mood hit me.
--WT
I think most people would have shot with a wide angle up close, but I kind of prefer this perspective for this subject, using a short-tele (85mm).
--WT
Labels: Cityscape, Composition, D100, Sigma
ooo, kinda creepy... so desolate and absent of life. Good pic, has a big impact with that bench ;)
Hey, I totally missed this one. Interesting.
Eric,
You were looking in the other direction at the time :).
http://fpcf.blogspot.com/2008/06/eric-shooting-on-treasure-island.html
--WT
Probably the Tookie Williams groupies.
It's a very cool shot - nice composition with city in background balanced by the foreground. It has a very brooding feeling - definitely a strong emotion, which makes it a successful image.
This is the season to do it!
That sure is beautiful country up there!
--WT
Lea,
I like this photo. I like how the horizon is, or appears to be, tilted, but the fence at the bottom is straight. I've been trying to frame many of my photos where an object lines up with one of the four edges, even if slightly tilting something else. I think it works well here.
Thanks for the comments :)
I never even noticed that the horizon is crooked! It just overall drew me in as a photo.. When biking and shooting, I often credit luck for composition. It's easy to accidentally tilt or turn the camera one way too far, so it's a guessing game a little bit.. perhaps somewhat similar to action shots. Thanks for pointing that out though! I'll keep an eye out for it in the future :)
Good to hear from you, Lea. I like this shot.I like the way the mountain fades into the background. A little mystical, ya know? I also like the composition, too. It gives me a wide open feel. Never been to Redmond, WA. Fun stuff!
It's great to see you so inspired, Steve! Nice shots!
Just wondering, can you set an upper limit on the auto-ISO? I think it's a very handy function. My D100 doesn't have it, and I sometimes forget to turn the ISO back down after I bumped it up for somr reason.
--Warren
I really like the people shots Steve :)
They are almost abstract settings for doors and entry points to a building... Makes for interesting composition!
Thanks for the nice words, Warren & Lea!
Lea - I didn't notice what you noticed about doors and entry points - good eye! I've often joked that I only have five or so photos that I take over and over:
1. Repeating pattern
2. Intesting geometric shapes
3. Radial lines
4. Little bit of something in a lot of nothing
5. Smooth/Textured
It's a joke but it's also sort of true! I call them "useful clichés" - I think we all have them - diffent ones of course - and they help us "see" in a particular way or style. I call them "clichés", but I don't mean to demean them - just can't think of a different word.
I'm really glad that you pointed the doors thing out to me, because now I can add
6. Doors and entry points!
Seriously - this is a good "theme."
Warren - you can't set an upper limit on auto-ISO - that would be a really good feature, though - you should send in the suggestion to Nikon!
Is it deja-vu or have I seen that woman in the green doorway picture before in another one of your pictures (dressed the same way)?
Many current dslrs of various brands already have a setable limit on auto-ISO. I think Nikon's D80 has it, for example.
--WT
Labels: Black and White, Composition, D100, Tamron
Beauty!
I love the way you've composed this so that it goes from wild, chaotic natural stream at upper left to a more orderly assemblage of rocks as a middle band to a very geometric and precise finish by the time the eye gets to the right side of the frame.
The cyclist is the perfect touch to add a sense of the huge scale.
Way to go!
Regards,
SteveR
Thanks Steve.
The sight of the bicyclist prompted me to compose the shot in the first place. In other words, I saw the cyclist, decided that I wanted to frame a picture around him, then I worked on the composition.
--WT
Thanks for posting the pic of your GSN, Ted. I like how you worked Kitty into the shot (he/she is very cute, and I have a soft spot for cats).
That's a nasty looking crack in the glass. Watch your fingers.
--WT
Aren't rangefinders great? I love my Cannonette and I'm tempted to take that along with my Nikon D40 to China in Oct. I'm glad you got your cat into it, too. Don't let him/her take it out too often though. You may find paw prints all over the lens.
Thanks Eric, yes RF's are great! I like your photos here with your Canonet. If I were you, I'd consider just taking an RF's to China, with maybe a Fuji F30 for night shots ;)
Hi Ted,
It looks like you got a good, working example of a GSN. The photo is tack sharp and well exposed. I have two GSNs. I bought the first one when I was exploring different rf cameras. It worked well early on when I first acquired it, but the last time I used it, I found that the rangefinder needed calibration (out of focus shots) and the AE was not working right. The camera and lens are in excellent condition, but it definitely needs some work in important parts. My second GSN was given to me by a friend who discovered that I loved old cameras. It once belonged to his father and it came as a whole kit including the wide and tele screw-on converter lenses with auxiliary finder and carrying case. This one is not as good cosmetically as my other one, and I never had a chance to actually shoot with it.
Just my own personal bias, but I find that while the lens on the GSN is excellent, I do not like the idea of an AE only camera. I much prefer the all manual operation of my Yashica Lynx 5000e.
Thanks for posting the sample shot, and I look forward to seeing more from this camera.
You gotta love it, a technically excellent photo from a vintage film camera following some excellent technical shots from the latest dslr :).
--Warren
Ted, how about posting a photo of your GSN. Some people may not know what it looks like. BTW, I agree with your mini review of the GSN on your blog.
--WT
Hi Warren, I too have mixed feelings about the AE only, but if you have time to think about it, you can actually estimate the programmed AE shutter speed to good approximation, by noting the limit lights at 1/30 low (yellow arrow), and high 1/500 (red arrow), and then compensate with the ISO dial (which ironically is where shutter speed dials usually are!), and then adjusting the ISO to put the shutter speed where you think it should be based on a handheld meter, or meter from another camera.
I realize that's a slow process, but it's kind of fun, for now, anyways...
I've also had a bad one, where the deck lights were intermittent, so since that one, I've always asked the sellers (except for the $1 one), not only if the meter worked, but if the deck and VF lights came on each and every time you pressed the shutter and weren't intermittent. These are definitely cheaper to replace than fix, if contacts are bad or the VF is bad.
I'll try to post a photo of my latest GSN. I got this one from Allan (Kaiyen) who you'll probably meet him at an RFF gathering sometime. The camera is in user shape, and has a crack in the window for the RF, but still meters fine, shutter seems fine, and VF is medium clean. I'm not sure if the focus is 100%, as I haven't shot many @ f1.7, but I have a roll of Reala 100 and can probably shoot indoors or in the shade with the 1/500 max and see if the focus is on, or front/back biased.
The other fast cheap RF is the Canonet QL1.7 G3 (or whatever) whose size I loved, but I didn't get on with the RF or lens quality, in my particular one.
BTW, except for a few tweaks, I used 320 ISO for my Fuji 400 Superia (Costco 3 layer). I couldn't bring myself to actually setting the ISO at 400, because I have been overexposing slightly with film for so long, so I don't get spots that need to be filled in with pp shadow enhancement. Not sure if that makes sense, as I always underexpose with digital, but somehow the films I use, often outdated, need a little more exposure than rated...
Will post a photo of the GSN soon.
I bought a Canonet G3 Ql17 from RFF. It was CLA'd and in great shape. I used it for a while and enjoyed its excellent lens, but I prefer Aperture Priority automation vs. Shutter Priority that's on the G3. Rather than sell it, I decided to give it to Eric for one of his birthdays (as I recall), and Eric has been putting it to good use. The G3 lens is really, really nice, and it's a very useful focal length. I also think that the build quality and materials use on the Canonet are better than the Yashica RF cameras that I've seen.
The saving grace for the Yashicas are their excellent lenses.
Do a search on this blog for "Canonet" and you'll find many shots by Eric, and a few by me, and also my original post about the Canonet (with picture) that I wrote right after I acquired it.
--Warren
Great photos from you and Eric, and a nice review. I like the size and styling of the Canonet, but it's got nothing on the GSN!! (plus the horrid PX625 battery issue) ;)
This is great, Ted - it reminds me of this article from Ken Rockwell that I found so interesting:
http://kenrockwell.com/tech/free-digital-camera.htm
BTW, for those old cameras that used mercury cells, you can buy a battery called "Wein cell" that has almost the same electrical characteristics as the mercury cell. It's more expensive (about 5 bucks) and only lasts about a year or so, but works very well otherwise - and no worries about meter calibration.
Thanks Steve, interesting article. I've used the Wein cells with my Canonets and Leica CL before, but usually ended up adapting to longer lasting cheaper 1.5V cells and dealing with the meter issues.
The GSN uses a different size and voltage battery than the 1.5V nickel sized PX625 Mercury types. It's a PX32 6V that was about the size of an AA batery, so it's a different type of battery than the 1.5V Mercury ones.
Fortunately, the metering circuitry of the GSN is regulated, so anything between about 4.5V and 6.3V works fine, and gives the same meter reading, even if you're using alkaline, lithium, or even mixing up 3V CR2s with a couple of LR44s, or using 4 LR44s stacked, etc.
Thanks for posting the test samples, Steve. That's mighty impressive technology! It almost makes me think about switching teams....not.
wooo wooo wooo
nyuk nyuk nyuk (oops, wrong post reference)
--WT
Steve, this is cool. Now that I am into the world of digital SLRs, I find this very interesting. That's just me/us of course. Some would say we're geeks.
You actually saw the Stooges LIVE?! Oh man, I envy you. After 48 yrs, they still crack me up! But like the thing with digital SLRs, some would say we were geeks.
Hey Mo! Look at the grouse! Oh yeah, you lame brain? Come here. I'll show you a grouse. BUT MO!!!
Steve, your picture of the Larry Fine background is pretty cool. It's like the two people are being serenated by a gigantic stooge!
It kind reminds me of the nightmarish qualities of my previously posted shot:
http://fpcf.blogspot.com/2006/08/nightmare-on-embarcadero.html
--WT
Labels: Black and White, Ilford XP2, Nikon FM, Photojournalism, Street
Something about this picture works for me. Would anyone care to say what it is about this photo that works, or doesn't work for them?
I would like to discuss/critique this one, if anyone cares to join in.
Thanks,
Warren
Damn Warren, that looks like something out of a magazine! Good shot. Critique? The upper right corner is a little washed out and it's a little distracting. Other than that, it's nice.
Eric
Thanks Eric. Just for clarification, when you say "washed out", do you mean that the area is too bright? (I had already burned that corner a bit to reduce brightness, and I thought I actually might have darkened it too much).
--WT
Warren,
It is a wonderful picture. Everyplace on the photo is clear and has a story except for that upper corner. The corner is a little fuzzy. The shot is just great, we seem to be picking on a little less than perfect.
Right, Warren. Too bright.
Eric
I agree with Eric, looks like a photo out of a magazine, and a good photo! I like how lots of things are going on in the photo, it's not a simple photo, it's busy, but in every section, there's a story of its own. It appears that you took your photo probably at the same time the wedding photographer took his, so it's in interesting different angle and good timing, and the lady with cell phone or hand to her ear is interesting, as are the dad and kid in the very middle looking on.
Hi Folks,
Thanks for the comments, all very interesting observations.
What works for me is the combination of balanced grouping of the main subject, which is the wedding party. The party is split into two groups that fan out into a semim-bowtie shape, bridged in the middle by the groom gazing at the photographer's subject. So you have several sets of converging lines and several interesting sight lines: The woman on the right with the cell phone gazing to the right, the bride engaged in a conversation with the woman next to her, the groom and photographer looking at the 2nd group. All in the second group looking to the left. And smack dab in the middle of the whole thing is the father and child, almost at the focal point of the converging lines.
Yes, it's a very complicated image, but I'm pleased with it.
It's another one of those situations where there was not very much time to think and compose. It was an instinctive capture, and with manual equipment (Nikon FM, 35mm f2.8). I mentioned this before, where my mind is almost on autopilot when it composes a shot. It's at once exhilirating, fun, and satisfying when the shot is successful.
--WT
Hey folks, my last two posts just suggested a new theme! How about "Photographers in Action"?
What do you think?
--WT
Labels: Black and White, Composition, D100
BTW, the Nikkor 85mm f1.8D sure is a snappy lens, isn't it? I also like how smooth the OOF objects appear in the background. There are a couple of Nikon lenses that never fail to impress me whenever I use them. The lenses are this one (85mm f1.8D), and the 105mm f2.5. You've seen shots from the 105mm f2.5 from my previous posts. This is also a good time to mention the search feature again. It works well. Just type in "105mm f2.5" and click on "Search Blog" to find all our posts with those words. We have so many posts now, over 1100, that the search tool is very useful for finding photos with specific subject matter or equipment.
--Warren
Eric is showing such excellent form in the way he holds his camera and braces his elbows, bipod-like, on top of his thighs!
Once again a beautiful B&W composition Warren!
It's very balanced and your design elements are really nice. The gentle arc of a cirle made by the large stones (downward from left to right) is echoed by the gentle arc of the bridge. The stones and the rest of the image form a positive-negative space continuum (how do you like *that*!) which are linked together by the human figure (Eric - you're a jigsaw piece!)
Well, I didn't see it that way right away - I just felt - wow, this is really appealing! Then I "deconstructed" it as above.
If I keep doing this, can I get a BA out of it??
Finally, seeing photos like this makes me again wish I could go on these photo-outings with you guys!
Thanks Steve!
I really appreciate that you took the time to articulate your thoughts about my picture (this and all the others). As you know, it's feedback like this that really fuel our enthusiasm for our art.
I hope you can come out here for a visit one of these days.
--Warren
Labels: Composition, D100, Landscape, Sigma, Yosemite
This is absolutely exquisite, Warren! I can't think of anything that would have made this better.
"...the first two were overexposed, so I switched to manual ..."
Hahaha - when I read that, I heard Obi-Wan's spirit saying, "Use the Force, Warren...use the Force!"
Thanks Steve!
The Sigma 15-30mm has been a tricky one to meter with ever since day one. It probably has something to do with the gigantic front element and ultrawide FOV that confuses metering systems.
If it wasn't for the handy review feature of the dslr, I would have had to bracket a lot more than I do with it now.
--WT
Killer photo. The colors are great and the composition is something else, too. Perhaps there is a little too much water showing in the front of the photo. It's a little distracting. But overall, man, it's Chinese painting time. That is what I compare photos to when they are landscapes I guess.
Eric
Little guy? About how little? 6 ft. long little or 6" or so little?
Eric
That would be a startling sight to see in the wild, but I guess after a while one gets used to it.
--WT
Crickee! What a beauty!! Good on ya, Dolph!
From the lack of coloring on the body, especially the tail - this one looks like an adult.
2 weeks ago, we visited friends in Sarasota FL - they live in a ritzy development built around a golf course, and there are ponds all around that provide habitat for gators. I was "complaining" all weekend about not seeing a single gator, when on the way out of the development to go to the airport, my friend stopped to let a 4-foot "teenager" pass. What a thrill!
When I use to go to the seder I lobbied for Fried Chicken....never happened. Nice use of the shadows with a beautiful setting.
That shot of the crystal is great. A very luxurious photo!
Eric
Beautiful table shot, Steve, classic and timeless!
--WT
0 Comments:
Post a Comment