Thursday, March 31, 2005


Descending into a Slot Canyon, Bryce Canyon NP, Utah, Nikon D100 Posted by Hello

It was slow going on the Navajo Loop Trail, picking our way down through the orange mud and snow. On this shot, I liked the delicate sliver of snow along the narrow trail that stood out against the vivid orange mud and canyon wall.

--Warren

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Monday, March 28, 2005


Cruise Ship Perspective Play, Konica Hexar, Fuji Sensia Posted by Hello

Hey Dolph! Does this look familiar? This was taken in the early morning on our cruise up the coast to Vancouver. When are we gonna see your cruise shots? Did you have a good time?

Gail and I like to prowl the ship early in the morning when everyone else is still asleep.

--Warren

2 Comments:

Blogger SteveR said...

I like the graceful shapes of the deck chairs - the natural, polished wood - and the way you composed the shot to have the repeating pattern of deck chairs lead the eye all the way down the deck.

Monday, March 28, 2005 at 8:13:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Thanks for the comment, Steve. I'm also posting this to test the email notification system. I just added two people to the email notification list.

--Warren

Monday, April 4, 2005 at 3:15:00 PM PDT  

Post a Comment

Saturday, March 26, 2005


Late afternoon SF Skyline from Marin, Nikon F4, Ektachrome Posted by Hello

This is from my archives, shot in the mid-90's. Yes, some of the highlights are a bit blown out in the background. Does that ruin the shot?

--Warren

0 Comments:

Post a Comment


Surfside Picnic, Nikon D100, 85mm f1.8D Posted by Hello

Another from my Ocean Beach series of a few weeks ago.

--Warren

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Friday, March 25, 2005


Hoboken Sleepers Posted by Hello

Trolling through some CDs I burned from last summer, I found this photo which I took in Hoboken early last August. I like the pattern made by the benches and the "reflection" of the foreground snoozer by the one in the background.

The park, uy the way ("Pier A Park",) is built on the ruins of decrepit shipping piers, left to rot for years after Hoboken faded as a center of shipping on the Hudson. It's a wonderful asset for the city - I wish we had it way back in the late 60's when I went to college in Hoboken!

Do you think the photo is too gray and dull overall?

2 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

This is a great capture, very humorous :).

I don't think it is too gray. It conveys a feeling of sleepiness :)

Besides, there are not too many true gray scenes out there, and it's interesting to see a well captured rendition.

Thanks for posting, Steve,

HEY, how about everyone else??? Where are you?

--WT

Saturday, March 26, 2005 at 9:04:00 AM PST  
Blogger SteveR said...

P.G. - yes, you DID say "juxtapositioning," and that means you're getting quite advanced in "seeing" photographically ;-)

Thanks for your kind comment.

-- SteveR

Wednesday, April 13, 2005 at 3:57:00 AM PDT  

Post a Comment

Wednesday, March 23, 2005


Green Chair, Red Wheel Posted by Hello

Canon Digital Rebel, Sigma 70-300mm zoom, f/8 @ 1/500, ISO 200

Another picture taken in front of that antique store a few weeks ago. I was attracted by the contrast of the red and the green at first. Then I noticed the play of the spokes of the wheel and the "spokes" on the back of the chair. Also, the I thought the curve of the wheel rim was echoed by the curved arm of the chair, as well as more subtly by some other curved shapes in shadow at right (very hard to see in the web image.)

But I'm really not sure if it all works. What do you think??

2 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

This is a very interesting picture to study. The more I looked at it, the more I liked it. I like the flare of red on the rim. It reminded me of Benson's shot of the St. Louis arch.

My mind wants to see more of the red wheel, but since the majority of it is in shadow, my eye naturally begins to fixate on that patch of snow on the chair seat. And I'm thinking to myself, "Hmmm, what would happen if I accidentally sat on that chair?".

So the design elements are there, but perhaps there is not a strong enough main subject to focus on.

Just some thoughts...

HEY, what does EVERYONE ELSE think? Inquiring minds REALLY would like to know :)

Saturday, March 26, 2005 at 8:58:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

I would really like to hear what others think of this picture. (and I'm sure Steve would appreciate it too) :).

--WT

Tuesday, April 5, 2005 at 3:51:00 PM PDT  

Post a Comment


World Weary, Nikon D100, 50mm f1.8 Posted by Hello

The first picture of Mr. White Cat didn't seem to go over very well. Here's a different shot. If cats could talk, he would have some interesting stories to tell, I'm sure.

Here's a link to the first picture.

--Warren

2 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

So when you look at this, do you just see "a cat" and it doesn't matter to you, therefore, no comment?

Or do you see something in his eyes? Or perhaps some poignancy in his "look". Can you empathize with his plight by viewing the picture?

Or "you had to be there and know the storey", therefore this picture does not push any buttons for you?

--WT

Saturday, March 26, 2005 at 9:14:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Or is this so unbearably gut-wrenching that nobody has the courage to say what they really feel, that it really HIT them hard to the point of speechlessness?

Or there is no point to a picture of a stray cat?

Or this picture really sucks so bad that it's not even worth responding to even one of the 6 questions that I asked about it?

:) :) :) :) :) :) :)

-WT

Tuesday, April 5, 2005 at 3:38:00 PM PDT  

Post a Comment

Monday, March 21, 2005


Oriental Garden Deck, Nikon D100, Tamron 24-135mm @ 24mm, 1/45 f4 Posted by Hello

We went for a walk in the Arboretum in Golden Gate Park and explored areas in there that we've never been to. I thought that this would be an ideal spot for an environmental portrait. Do you think this shot is okay as-is, even without anyone on the deck?

--Warren

2 Comments:

Blogger SteveR said...

Warren - this is a great question - I often wonder the same thing, as many of my photos focus on some sort of pattern or design - whether they would be improved with a person in the picture.

In general, I like this photo very much - the way that you used the foliage to "frame" the little bridge - and the bridge itself isn't straight-on, it's at an angle and has perspective and depth.

The photo is good as it is, I think. That said, one always wonders.... would a spot of contrasting color to play against the overall green be cool? ... would a person add a point of focus and improve the image?

I'll be interested in what the others have to say.

Monday, March 21, 2005 at 4:36:00 PM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Thanks. I think it kind of works as a stand-alone shot, but I really took this picture to remember the spot. I fully intend to bring someone there for an environmental portrait. It will either be a single person or a couple, and I was thinking of placing them at the first post next to the rock.

Okay, I got first dibs on this location :). I don't remember seeing any locally displayed pictures from here...yet :).

--WT

Monday, March 21, 2005 at 5:25:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment

Thursday, March 17, 2005


Lake Louise, Canada, Nikon F4, 24mm f2.0, Kodak RG 200 Posted by Hello

Some of you may remember seeing this one already. I reworked it a little in Photoshop to post here. When I first scanned it, I didn't know Photoshop as well as I do now.

A few years ago, we went to the Banff and Lake Louise area in late May/early June, and we were able to see Lake Louise half iced over. You can see Chateau Lake Louise at the far end of the lake. We parked there and went for a hike around one side of the lake. While taking a break to admire the view, a cooperative chipmunk posed for me on a rock. With the 24mm lens, I was actually pretty close to the little fellow.

--Warren

2 Comments:

Blogger martin said...

This photo has much detail, perhaps too much. The chipmunk is nice and the green band in the water is ok but the sky and the reflection in the water are too light. I'm curious to see the original file. I suspect that you lightened the detail in the right side of the water too much.

Saturday, March 19, 2005 at 4:41:00 PM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Thanks for the comments. I agree, the sky is a little light. I did not do too much lightening. That's pretty much exactly how the water and reflection looked, including the turquoise color.

Perhaps you don't like to "see" ultrawide perspectives, or it's not your preference.

--Warren

Saturday, March 19, 2005 at 5:04:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment

Tuesday, March 15, 2005


Raw Power, NIkon D100, Tamron 24-135mm @ 40mm, 1/320 f9. Posted by Hello

How about a change of pace and a splash of color?

This was from the Stanford Concours from a couple of years ago. This is the classic hot rod setup, a supercharger on a V8. In this case, it's on a 1973 Corvette. I was struck by the lighting on this one with the vivid background color.

--Warren

4 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

For those of you who are not car nuts, did this picture do anything for you?

Or it it just..."oh, it's just nutty Warren and his stoopid car pictures".

In other words, would this appeal to the "common" viewer?

Just curious...

Monday, March 21, 2005 at 2:26:00 PM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

By the way, I found that this picture makes a great desktop wallpaper on the PC. I have it on my work PC. :)

Monday, March 21, 2005 at 3:05:00 PM PST  
Blogger SteveR said...

Well, I'm not all that interested in cars, but I like the photo very much!

You created an "anthropomorphic" image in the way you framed this part of the engine - looks like a 3-eyed, yellow-caped superhero. The diagonal belt is like a "Sam Browne" belt soldiers used to wear before WWII.

Really nice colors and composition.

I think I would have liked to see the entire circle of the pulley at the bottom, but you can't always get what you want...

Monday, March 21, 2005 at 4:40:00 PM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Steve, you have a way with words. This is the most delightful (to me) comment on FPCF so far :) :) Your "anthropomorphic" interpretation brought a smile to my face, and made my day. Thanks!

Monday, March 21, 2005 at 4:51:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment

Monday, March 14, 2005

Look! No Grain!!



Is photoshop the greatest thing since sliced bread or what??

I'm a bit amazed myself.

4 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

That's a dramatic difference from the original. You HAVE to tell us how you did it.

Monday, March 14, 2005 at 2:11:00 PM PST  
Blogger martin said...

I used the Gaussian blur filter in Photoshop. The trick is to apply it selectively and not in the entire photo. The Gaussian blur does the opposite of the unsharp mask filter. One blurs, the other sharpens. Most Photoshop books have a section on manipulation, retouching and tonal correction. There are also tutorials on the net. It takes a bit of practice. I don't usually soften photos but in this case, it could take me a couple of months to do a reshoot. It took me more than a hour to figure it out.

Monday, March 14, 2005 at 9:12:00 PM PST  
Blogger Unknown said...

Aaaaghhh, the power of photoshop. I need to practice more because you have shown me the power. The extended foreground really illustrates the power of fog which is usually underappreciated by those who haven't experienced it. It has the feel of those half above and half below water shots. tc

Monday, March 14, 2005 at 9:37:00 PM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Ahah! Yes, I used Gaussian blur before to clean up distracting backgrounds, but it didn't occur to me until you mentioned it that you can also use it to smooth out grain (doh!).

Good one.

Monday, March 14, 2005 at 10:12:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment

Saturday, March 12, 2005


"Friends", St. Mary's Square, SF Chinatown, Nikon F4, Ektachrome Posted by Hello

Two friends engrossed in their private conversation in the late afternoon.

This shot and the previous Carmel Mission picture were from a test roll of the new Ektachrome E100GX slide film. It's the replacement film for the E100SW that I used before. I like it.

--Warren

4 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Well, since this pic didn't rate a comment so far. I have a question for you all. :)

Did this composition work for you?

The circumstance is that I was sitting on a bench in the late afternoon across from these two women who were deeply engrossed in their private conversation. I was able to be unobtrusive because I had my 85mm mounted. From my position, I was able to frame the shot to include the trees.

Is it interesting, or just...blah, boring.

--WT

Monday, March 21, 2005 at 2:19:00 PM PST  
Blogger SteveR said...

Warren - I see what you were getting at... and I appreciate it...but it just doesn't do anything for me.

Maybe closer up, or highly cropped?

Monday, March 21, 2005 at 4:38:00 PM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Thanks for the comment. As this is an area of photography that I'm not very familiar with, I NEED and CRAVE feedback on these types of shots. I don't get to practice street shooting very often, but it's fun when I do, and it would be great to become decent at it someday.

Monday, March 21, 2005 at 5:19:00 PM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Thinking about this picture more, perhaps all that foliage takes the focus and attention away from my main subject. I think when I have a minute, I'll try for a highly cropped version to see if that works better.

Monday, March 21, 2005 at 5:45:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment


Carmel Mission, 12/2004, Nikon F4, 50mm f1.8D, Ektachrome Posted by Hello

The trouble with shooting film is the time lag in processing the stuff after you shoot it. I finally got this roll processed last week. However, it's often worth the wait.

An interesting side note: this shot and the one following (the "Friends" picture) were posted full frame. You can see the black edges of the transparencies from the scan. I've been shooting with 100% viewfinders of F series cameras for so long that it really makes a big difference to have full confidence in the accuracy of the viewfinder. I tend to do more complete compositions in-camera when shooting with the F series film cameras, so that these shots required no cropping during post-processing.

--Warren

1 Comments:

Blogger Unknown said...

Warren, the crosses make the photo! Good eye. Taking shots of landmarks can be so hard and boring. This is a nice arrangement. tc

Monday, March 14, 2005 at 9:32:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment

A picture for another time

Photo by Martin Jeong

Here's a frame I made last week at the same time I did the photo of the bridge. I was not prepared to make this shot as I was underlensed and didn't have a tripod with me. This was shot with a 200mm lens and cropped a bit. Next time I'll have to keep a 300mm and a tripod in the car.

3 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Nice concept. That's some brutal grain there though :). Yeah, I'd say it's a bit under-lensed. If you ever want to borrow my 500mm Nikkor Reflex, just let me know.

--WT

Sunday, March 13, 2005 at 8:30:00 PM PST  
Blogger martin said...

Yes, grain is bad. I'm going to try softening it in Photoshop.

I wish I could take all my equipment with me but it's too heavy. I guess next time I'll plan my shots and bring what I need.

This acutally brings up a good point. When you go on a trip such as Yosemite, how much equipment do you bring? My feeling is the more equipment you bring, the less mobile you are.

Monday, March 14, 2005 at 7:11:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

I'm a minimalist when it comes to carrying equipment. For my Yosemite trips, my kit has probably been different with every trip (and I've been there a lot :) ) I usually do not carry a tripod. Before my digital equipment, I pretty much settled on a kit consisting of: 24mm, 35mm, and 85mm prime lenses, plus one of my F bodies.

For our last trip to Yosemite, I carried:

Nikon F4 w/24-135mm
Nikon D100 w/15-30mm

And of course, the two zooms were interchanged. We were there for a friend's wedding, and I wanted to shoot some B&W XP2 film, so I brought the F4. That rectilinear 15mm made for some interesting shots on the F4. I may post one that I shot of the wedding ceremony using the 15-30mm at 15mm on the F4.

Buying the D100 caused me to try a couple of new zooms, the 24-135mm and the 15-30mm. I needed the superwide because of the 1.5x crop factor of the D100. While these modern zooms are very good, I find that I still prefer shooting with primes.

--Warren

Monday, March 14, 2005 at 7:36:00 AM PST  

Post a Comment


Bus Scene, Nikon F3HP, 24mm f2.8, Tri-X Posted by Hello

We took the bus that day between the Vietnamese fair and the Chinatown fair, and since I had my camera on a bus, I decided to try for a typical mass transit grab shot :).

--Warren

2 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Is there any value in this picture as a snapshot of public transit, or a waste of bandwidth?

There doesn't seem to be any standout elements in the shot... or is there?

I'm wondering...

Monday, March 21, 2005 at 2:29:00 PM PST  
Blogger SteveR said...

Good for you Warren - keep asking questions and eventually you'll get some conversation!

I think this one is close... but not quite. As a street photograph, it has good composition - the line of the longish light at top and the repeating patterns made of the riders in the front and the two riders in the foreground.

I think if the pole weren't in the way of the near rider, and we could see the expression on the face, it would be really good.

Transit shots are hard - my hero in NYC, Dave Beckerman http://www.davebeckerman.com does it really well and it's worthwhile to check his photoblog frequently.

Monday, March 21, 2005 at 4:51:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment


Vietnamese New Year Festival, SF, Nikon F3HP, 24mm f2.8, Tri-X Posted by Hello

For one weekend, San Franciso's Tenderloin district is transformed into a nice, inviting festival of flowers and food. I wanted to show that in a picture. This seedy area has been transformed by Vietnamese immigrants into a somewhat respectable place, but you can see the other side if you look hard enough.

--Warren

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Friday, March 11, 2005

One Man's Junk...


Green Metal Chairs Posted by Hello
Digital Rebel, Sigma 70-300mm Macro II Zoom
1/640 sec @ f/8

One man's junk can sometimes be another's photo treasure. I wouldn't necessarily want to sit in them or have them in my yard, but I really liked the patterns, especially the bright white radial lines on the foreground chair.

One of many photos taken early two Saturdays ago at an antique shop near me.

2 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Steve, I liked your other antique shop pictures, but this one doesn't click with me for some reason. Perhaps it's not quite abstact enough for me to get past the fact that it's a pair of junk chairs. Or maybe the white on green color scheme does not have enough impact...hmmmm.

Thanks for posting!

Regards,

Warren

Sunday, March 13, 2005 at 8:28:00 PM PST  
Blogger Unknown said...

Steve, I like the lines and the colors. I also like that I can make out what it is. For me, the shadows are a little distracting. Specifically the upper left hand corner and the white cushion.

The shadow across the face of the chair works though. tc

Monday, March 14, 2005 at 9:30:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment


Free 15 minute Joyrides, Nikon F3HP, 24mm f2.8, Tri-X. Posted by Hello

I thought it was funny that these two slick salesmen were selling these $4500+ chairs to Chinatown residents. At least some of them got to relax for a bit before going back to their shopping for spring flowers and New Years goods.

--Warren

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Thursday, March 10, 2005


Gladiola Stand, Chinatown Street Fair, Nikon F3HP, 24mm f2.8, Tri-X. Posted by Hello

Gail has a good eye for pictures too. When we walked up to this flower stand, she saw the colorful array of flowers and said I should shoot this. I was already mulling this one over because I knew that I had B&W film, and I was thinking about how to shoot this with B&W in mind. This would have been nice in color because of all the red foliage, but I hope this B&W image works too.

--Warren

1 Comments:

Blogger SteveR said...

That's what I'M talkin' about!

Great composition - the shape of the gladiola stems and the line of people going from center-left to upper right.

It's hard to get good composition in street photography, but this is a great example.

Friday, March 11, 2005 at 2:42:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment


Taking a Break from the Street Fair, Pacific Ave., Chinatown, Nikon F3HP, Nikkor 85mm f2, Tri-X film. Posted by Hello

I was standing in the middle of the blocked off Pacific Avenue looking at all hustle-bustle of the people enjoying the street fair. Then I noticed these two solemn looking girls sitting off to the side, next to the "No Stopping" sign.

--Warren

0 Comments:

Post a Comment


Brush Painting Demonstration at Chinese New Year Street Fair, Nikon F3HP, Nikkor 24mm f2.8, Tri-X film. Posted by Hello

It was kind of windy that day. I had to wait a few minutes to catch the right moment where the brush stroke, bystanders, and rooster painting were all where I wanted them.

All cameras have their own characteristics. When I use the F3HP, I think about its strengths, the 100% viewfinder, relatively compact size for a F series Nikon, solid feel, smooth and light shutter release, simplicity and quietness of operation(manual focus with manual exposure or aperture priority AE), etc.

--Warren

2 Comments:

Blogger Unknown said...

I like that you put the example of what they are doing in the foreground (sp?)to better illustrate the event. The actual people are a little static. I wonder if you had waited if a more interesting moment would have happend?

Monday, March 14, 2005 at 9:25:00 PM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Tony, it's funny that you mentioned the static people. Actually, the whole demo was quite slow and boring! :)

Thanks for all your great comments. I'm eager to see more of you PJ efforts.

Monday, March 14, 2005 at 10:15:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment


GG Bridge, After the Fog Burned Off that Day, Voigtlander Bessa R, 35mm f2.5, Kodak Royal Superia ISO 200 Posted by Hello

Yes, I looked like a total photographer geek that day. I was carrying two cameras, my D100 w/85mm and my Bessa R w/35mm. This is from the other side of the Gate (from Martin's sunrise picture). In fact, you can probably see the spot where Martin was standing when he got that morning shot.

--Warren

2 Comments:

Blogger martin said...

This picture might look better in black and white but I'm not sure. The bridge is a bit hazy and the sky not saturated enough. Perhaps the use of a polarizing filter would help next time. Maybe it can be improved with a little photshop work. Looks like the photo was made in the middle of the day, usually the light is not as good.

Friday, March 11, 2005 at 2:27:00 PM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

This comment leads me to wonder the following. What is the purpose of the picture, as a record of the actual conditions present at the moment the shutter was snapped, or as representation of what the photographer wants to show the viewer?

My answer to that question, is that it varies depending on the mood of the photographer, and the type of photo assignment that the photographer is working on.

What do you think?

So the sky is not saturated, and the bridge was hazy, that's EXACTLY how the scene looked to the naked eye. If I wanted to record that moment for posterity and for my own pleasure and future memories, I would want to record what my eye saw, not a filter manipulated or monochromatic rendition of that day. If I had wanted to create a postcard image, I would have put on a polarizer and/or done some other manipulation in Photoshop to achieve that effect that I was after.

Monday, March 21, 2005 at 2:42:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment

While Warren was at Ocean Beach ---

SF fog

I was up early looking for fog.

5 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Totally spectacular picture, Martin! Did you really take this on the same day as my Ocean Beach shots? This pictures looks very, very familiar for some reason.

I'm very interested in knowing some technical details of the shot such as camera, lens, settings, and how much and what kind of post-processing was done to it.

The lens seems to have excellent flare control.

It's nicely composed, with particularly good placement of sun and sun reflection in relation to the shadowy foreground hills.

I know that spot in the Marin Headlands, but I feel like I'm seeing this view from an airplane flying at very high altitude.

--Warren

Thursday, March 10, 2005 at 3:12:00 PM PST  
Blogger martin said...

I shot this on Sunday. I had shot this on the day before but the fog was not the same. Persistence pays off!

Technical data: Nikon F, 28mm lens, Tri-x, red filter, 1/500 sec.@f/8, scanned, sky was darkened a little and the fog lightened.

A bit interesting that I made this with a 30 year old camera! The lens is an old 28mm f/3.5 Nikkor.

I had shot a similar photo more than twenty years ago from the same spot. I'll post it later if I can find it.

Friday, March 11, 2005 at 7:44:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Hey, I had one of those lenses. Did I trade you something for it many years ago? I wouldn't be surprised if we did.

-WT

Friday, March 11, 2005 at 8:08:00 AM PST  
Blogger martin said...

Maybe, I have two of those lenses. There were several other photographers taking photos when I was there. A couple of guys had a large format camera on a tripod, they were there the day before too. Several others with digital SLRs.

Here's a the URL of that earlier fog photo from 1983 I think.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v373/photodog/oldfog.jpg

Friday, March 11, 2005 at 9:07:00 AM PST  
Blogger SteveR said...

Both beautiful, beautiful photos!

You guys make me wish I lived in California!

Friday, March 11, 2005 at 2:47:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment


POSTED FOR JILL: Self-Portrait on a '56 Chevy Bumper, Nikon N65 Posted by Hello

Quoting Jill: "I've always liked unusual reflection shots, and this one caught my eye when I saw how the curvature of the bumper reflected across two different axes (axises?)."

This is Jill's first post to FPCF!!!

2 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Jill, this is a fun shot to look at. I can count at least 5 images of you in the reflections. The graceful curve of the bumper adds to the effect. It would look more like a self-portrait if you could have made your reflection appear bigger and thus more noticeable.

--Warren

Sunday, March 13, 2005 at 7:28:00 PM PST  
Blogger Unknown said...

Jill, I love this photo. Nice grab. The color makes it for me. I love the saturation and the green grass against the blue reflected in the bumper. The different details on the bumper are nice as well. tc

Monday, March 14, 2005 at 9:22:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment


Beach Art at Ocean Beach, SF, Nikon D100 w/85mm f1.8D Posted by Hello

While eating lunch at the Cliff House, we saw this artist slowly drawing his work across Ocean Beach. I took this from a window of the restaurant.

-- Warren

3 Comments:

Blogger martin said...

This is good photo! What makes this picture work is the black wall at a diagonal in the photo. The sandpainting is graphic and has a oval shape and the wall balances that. The only suggestion I would make is to make the black border narrower. It's too wide and takes away from teh picture.

Friday, March 11, 2005 at 7:31:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Interestingly, I'm new at doing borders, but I wanted to give this shot a black border in order to accentuate the black diagonal wall. So I arbitrarily decided on 20 pixels for the border. Perhaps that was a bit much :). Thanks for the feedback.

--Warren

Friday, March 11, 2005 at 8:06:00 AM PST  
Blogger SteveR said...

I love this photo.

Yes, the black wall really ties it together - I especially like the little bunch of people at its lower right end - it adds a nice balance to the large mass of the sandpainting.

I just read the above and wonder if I really know what I'm talking about ;-) but doesn't it sound good??

This image is just plain fun to look at!

I'd like to learn more about doing borders and frames in Photoshop myself (actually, I use Elements 2.0) I understand that you can download all sorts of Photoshop "actions" for frames, but I don't know what that means.

Friday, March 11, 2005 at 2:45:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment

Tuesday, March 08, 2005


Surf Watchers at Sutro Bath Ruins and Seal Rocks, SF, 3/6/2005 Posted by Hello

- Nikon D100 w/85mm f1.8D, 1/640 f13

4 Comments:

Blogger martin said...

This photo is missing something. Maybe it confuses the viewer as to what the point of the photo is. Is the surf the point of interest here? If it is, I should see more of the surf. Why the square crop? I'm confused.

Monday, March 14, 2005 at 9:04:00 PM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Thanks for the comment. That's an interesting observation. I actually had a version of this photo in a conventional format with some surf on the right side of the picture. Then I decided that the real point of the picture is the arrangement of the main features of the picture, namely the two rock formations and the group of people in the foreground. It didn't quite feel right to me, and I wanted to see what all of you thought about it before I said anything (I was on the verge of saying something :) )

I'd love to hear if everyone else was confused by this one too.

As for the square crop, I thought that it would accentuate what I wanted the viewer to concentrate on.

Monday, March 14, 2005 at 10:20:00 PM PST  
Blogger Unknown said...

My take was that the photo was a "about" people watching the surf. So really, it is about both and that works for me.

A distraction for me is the pair sitting on the block. My eye keeps trying to resolve them out of the dark background of the rock and it becomes distracting. Could they be lightened up in the darkroom or computer? tc

Monday, March 14, 2005 at 10:51:00 PM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Tony, good point about the people in the shadows. I was debating on whether or not to lighten the foreground people, or just let them be silhouettes.

Has anyone considered the shapes of the 3 main groups? The outcroppings on the lower right of each rock formation. Then the arrangement of the two pairs of people that sort of resembles that shape. I must admit, that's a bit of a stretch, right? :) :) But I thought that it was kind of cool.

Anyway, perhaps this picture is worth a rework when I have some spare time.

--WT

Monday, March 14, 2005 at 11:13:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment

Friday, March 04, 2005

Street Photography - City Reflection



I shot this earlier this week.

2 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Nicely framed, with a nice scene inside. Over the years, I've shot a few rearview mirror shots too. We can probably do a whole montage on that theme alone :).

Are you using your Leicas these days?

--WT

Friday, March 4, 2005 at 11:22:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Did you go out thinking: "I think I'll do a mirror shot today", or was it a more spontaneous grab? Just curious...

Friday, March 4, 2005 at 11:24:00 AM PST  

Post a Comment