Wednesday, November 09, 2011

Photography with Warren's Nikon F2






I finally took the Nikon F2 that Warren generously gave me a few years ago out for a shoot. Here are some images from a roll of Kodak Gold 200 taken in Annapolis last Saturday afternoon. I took the roll to Costco (Price Club) and they developed and scanned the negatives for me (the scanning resolution works out to 19 megapixels!)

I used a Nikkor 43-86mm f/3.5 zoom, a classic lens, the first version of which is reputed by some to be the worst lens Nikon ever made. This one is the 11-element 1976 AI version. I rather liked its performance, which was limited anyway by my presbyopic ability to focus properly without a prescription eyepiece.

I made some very slight adjustments for exposure and color temperature in Adobe Camera Raw, then added a very little bit of sharpening in Photoshop to get these end results. I'm very happy with the colors, but the grain of the film is very apparent, even at less than 50% magnification in Photoshop (hard to see in these 800-pixel, web-sized images.) I attribute that to the film itself, and will try Kodak Ektar 100 or Portra 160, both of which are said to be much better in terms of grain and suitability for scanning.

In any event, I am enjoying displaying and using these classic cameras. With my recent attack of Gear Acquisition Syndrome (GAS,) I've already acquired far too many classic SLRs in the past month or so, but at least they'll keep Warren's two Nikons company. I'll be shooting most of them over the next few weeks and months and will report back on them as well.

Thanks again Warren!

Labels: , , , , , ,

4 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

It's nice to see folks posting some film shots on here :)

It looks like your 43-86mm is performing well.

Thanks for posting these F2 shots :)

--Warren

Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 10:20:00 PM PST  
Blogger tedm said...

Great photos Steve. I have an early '70s single coated, 9 element version of this lens. I like it a lot, compact, nice zoom range, and not overly sharp, just right for portraits, probably not great for architecture shots.

Here's some great history on this ground breaking lens:

http://imaging.nikon.com/history/nikkor/4/index.htm

Wednesday, November 9, 2011 at 10:27:00 PM PST  
Blogger Steve Rosenbach said...

Ted - thanks for that link - I really enjoyed reading about the history of the lens. It's a great write-up, and puts the "worst lens" accusation, which I think is way too harsh anyway, into an understandable context.

I especially liked this summary by Mr. Oshita:

"But if pushed for a snap assessment, I think that the most appropriate single word would be 'practical'."

to which I would add, "... and good-looking, too!" ;-)

Warren - thank you again for your generous gift of this camera - I'm very sorry it took me so long to use it. It was great to hold and use such a weighty, classic SLR again... it took me back to 1968-77, when I had a Nikon F Photomic T - a nice trip ;-)

Thursday, November 10, 2011 at 4:53:00 AM PST  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Steve, echoing Warren glad to see you using film. I too gave Warren a Nikon body and lenses a few years back and he has been posting quite a few great film scans. I especially like your character studies, nicely done.

Dan

Thursday, November 10, 2011 at 8:04:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment

Friday, October 28, 2011

More Nikon FM Photos...


Just after I took a few snaps of the gentleman, this beautiful young woman stepped in to pose in front of the vintage bike. I think she looks like a young Joan Collins... maybe even more lovely.

The other photo is an abstract of shadows of the cast iron railing on the steps of a brownstone on W. 15th Street. The brownstone was indeed brown, and I gave it the sepia treatment.

These were taken with the Nikon FM that Warren generously gave me!

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

6 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Wow, really nice shots, Steve. :)

thanks for posting them here. I'm happy that you're enjoying the Nikons that I gave you.

--Warren

Saturday, October 29, 2011 at 9:13:00 AM PDT  
Blogger Warren T. said...

That bystander in the upper right background is interesting (in a kind of creepy way). :)

--Warren

Monday, October 31, 2011 at 11:26:00 AM PDT  
Blogger Steve Rosenbach said...

"..in a kind of creepy way.."

I agree ;-) I wish I had moved a little to the right to keep him out of the frame. He was just an innocent bystander, but this viewpoint makes it look like he's lurking in the shadows.

Monday, October 31, 2011 at 7:43:00 PM PDT  
Blogger Steve Rosenbach said...

Warren, BTW, I just received a very clean Nikon 43-86 zoom 427 in an eBay auction - it makes a nicely balanced and not too heavy mate to the Nikon F2 you gave me... I'm gonna try to shoot that set this weekend.

Monday, October 31, 2011 at 7:45:00 PM PDT  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Very cool that you have a 43-86mm to go with the F2. I can't wait to see your F2 shots. --WT

Monday, October 31, 2011 at 11:22:00 PM PDT  
Blogger tedm said...

That's a great photo Steve. I like the 43-86 zoom. I have an early one, and while the extremes of the range have distortions, the low contrast can give some nice glow and old camera looks. Really nice with film!

Tuesday, November 1, 2011 at 6:43:00 PM PDT  

Post a Comment

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Vintage Camera Day - With a Gift From Warren!

Shutterbug Excursionaires - Vintage Camera Day, Baltimore
Ansco Titan 20 Folder
Lightship Abstract
Devon & Ann-MarieLeroy with Foldex 20Here are some photos I took using Warren's generous gift to me of a Nikon FM. It's the first time I've shot film since August 2003!

I took my "new" Nikon to today's Vintage Camera Day outing of my photo group, Shutterbug Excursions.

The Nikon handled beautifully, and as you can see, the results are quite sharp. We all took our film to a Ritz 1-Hour photo place a block away from the Inner Harbor, and they did a decent enough job on 4x6 prints. I also had them scan the negatives onto a CD for an additional $4.00 per roll. Unfortunately, the scans were dissappointing - an average of only 1MB per photo. There's no reason they shouldn't be at least 3000 x 2000 pixels using modern minilabs, so I won't use Ritz any more.

But overall, my first film experience in almost 6 years worked out well. And best of all, our gang had a really good time.

Thanks again to Warren for the great camera!

Labels: , , ,

3 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Wow, that looked like a fun outing! I'm glad you're enjoying the FM, Steve. The pictures look really nice.

--Warren

Saturday, March 14, 2009 at 9:59:00 PM PDT  
Blogger Ted M said...

Great photos Steve! I especially like the one of the guy with the baby and hat, and black background. I think you should shoot with film more often!!

Saturday, March 14, 2009 at 10:08:00 PM PDT  
Blogger Steve Rosenbach said...

Thanks, guys - yes, it was fun to see if I still knew how to shoot film ;-) For the photo of Devin and his baby daughter, he was carrying her "face inward" at first while she was sleeping. She woke up and he turned her around just about when we got to the aquarium, which has some concrete walls painted in various primary colors. I picked a stretch of dark blue wall, but it came out black in the print and the scan - but still has the desired effect.

BTW, I took a closer look, and the scans were done at 1700x1110 pixels - so 1.89 Megapixels. I'm gonna check with Costco - I think they do at least 3000 x 2000, and they're cheaper to boot. The reason I chose Ritz on this outing is that we were downtown and that's all that was nearby.

Sunday, March 15, 2009 at 2:12:00 AM PDT  

Post a Comment