Tuesday, October 31, 2006
Monday, October 30, 2006
3 Comments:
- SteveR said...
-
Very nice composition and tonality... and I love the humor! Excellent.
- Warren T. said...
-
Good timing, and well seen!
--WT - Eric said...
-
Glad you guys like the photo. As for good timing and composition, well that was all up to chance. I just looked around and there it was. Got lucky on this one.
Eric
2 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
The expansive foreground does give a solitary feeling, but I also get a cramped or crowded feeling because the main subject is so close to the edge of the frame relative to the rest of the image.
--WT - Eric said...
-
OK, thx for the input Warren. Major mistake - I should've taken more than just 1 shot. I'll file this away for next time I see such a situation.
Eric
3 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Nice, balanced composition, and interestingly shaped tree.
--WT - Eric said...
-
Thx. It was towards the end of the hike. I took one with the sun shining thru the tree also, but it didn't look too good. Just looked a little washed out. Used this one instead.
Eric - Eric said...
-
Thx Tom. When I saw the tree against the sun, I thought it would make an interesting photo.
Eric
Sunset at Dillon Beach, CA
Nikon D100, Tamron 24-135mm
We were up at Dillon Beach for the weekend with some friends at a rented house. Eric was there too, so I'm sure you'll be seeing Eric's pictures here soon.
This is picture from Friday evening... just your standard sunset shot. Our rental house was located on a bluff overlooking the beach. At sunset, we walked out to the edge to get a better view. We had some unusually great weather for a couple of days up there before it got cold and cloudy on Sunday morning.
--Warren
3 Comments:
- Eric said...
-
This came out very nice. The ripples add a lot to it. What a great weekend it was.
Eric - Lea said...
-
YAY FOR SUNSETS :D I love the waves too! And I just noticed that the collective yellow in the shot makes the shape of a Christmas tree angel :)
- Warren T. said...
-
Thanks for the comments.
Lea, I also noticed the angel shape. I'm glad that you mentioned it!
--Warren
Saturday, October 28, 2006
Variations on a theme
Original shot
Straight desaturate
High contrast monochrome via channel mixer
Illford HP5 400 pushed 1 stop
Kodachrome 64
Velvia 100
Cross processed C41 in E6 chemicals
Lomo cross processed Fuji
------------------------------------------------------------
I made this version from Tom's original shot, posted with Tom's permission. (see comments)
--WT
7 Comments:
- Lea said...
-
When I first looked at them, my favorite one was the Velvia 100. The brick colour is bold and the floor seems very clear and bright. But then I was thinking about what message you might be wanting to portray (potentially).
The red brick pictures are the most attention grabbing. Likely because of the red.
The black and whites make me think "historical value" and prompt factual questions like where is this, when was it built, what was it used for, is it still used today. And a bit more specifically, the high contrast monochrome pic reminds me of textbook photos or ones in museums. Maybe because of the brightness and slightly faded look.
If I were to choose one word to describe the last picture it would be solitude. The greeny/yellowy tint kind of gives it the feeling of impoverished and desparate times and could be a scene in the movie Angela's Ashes. It has that mossy look to it.
All of them are great pics, but maybe for different reasons :) - Warren T. said...
-
Tom,
Thanks for this very interesting comparison and exercise!
Here are my thoughts on the various versions:
- Original Shot: this needs some obvious post-processing to bring out its potential. It needs some levels adjustment at the very least.
- Straight desaturate: This technique works to give you a quick view of how the image would look in B&W, but it does not give enough control over how each color is represented or corresponds to a shade of grey, therefore it is not the ideal way to convert a color shot to B&W.
- Channel Mixer: I personally use the channel mixer to convert my own color shots to B&W, but I usually tweak with other tools in PS before I am satisfied with it. Of the B&W versions, I like this one the most.
- HP5 +1: This one lacks the contrast punch of the channel mixer version, and the artifical grain is a bit muddy, and I think actually detracts from the image.
- K64: This is my favorite of the color versions because of the (IMO) natural rendition of the red bricks, and the good details visible on the floor. It's a bit cool feeling, but that's probably how the scene felt when you were standing there.
- Velvia: I think the reds are unnaturally oversaturated on this one, and the floor details are not clear, but it does produce a warmer feeling to the shot.
- C41-E6: This is very similar to the K64 version, but with maybe a slight edge in contrast. It's a tossup, this one is nice too.
- Lomo: Unless you use this for a special effects shot, this unnatural version doesn't do it for me.
In my opinion, the most important question is: Tom, which version best represents how you saw that scene, or alternatively, which version would you show if you could only show one?
I also made a version from your original. Would you like to see it?
--Warren - tedm said...
-
Tom, these are all great. I especially line the 2nd and 3rd ones, along with the last lomo/fuji one.
- Warren T. said...
-
Tom, I added my version to the end of this post. BTW, nice shot! Where is this?
--Warren - Warren T. said...
-
So what are YOUR thoughts on the different versions?
--WT - SteveR said...
-
I like the Kodachrome version the best. Mama, don't take my Kodachrome away-ay-ay-ay-ay!
Besides the different versions, I really like the composition of the repeating, receding arches and the red/black color scheme.
Thanks for the amount of work and patience you put into this! - Warren T. said...
-
So, Tom, what are YOUR thoughts on the versions that you posted? Inquiring minds want to know :).
--WT
Friday, October 27, 2006
Unedited. Halloween Is Approaching.
One of the craziest things I think I've ever seen is this grasshopper skeleton sitting on an unopened queen anne's lace. When I saw it, it really blew me away and I felt pretty creeped out to be honest...
I thought it was something fit for a horror film. Good thing it was the daytime or I would've been running outta there screaming!!!
I was told that it was likely the leftover from a praying mantis' dining. I didn't even know praying mantids lived in Ontario... and coincidentally, I saw one a few days later at a baseball game climbing up the fence by our bench. Its movements were very slow. Reading up on them a little, I learned that their slowness and green camouflaging helps them hunt unsuspecting creatures such as this grasshopper and eat their heads first! I don't know how I'll react if I see one ever again...
4 Comments:
- Eric said...
-
YOW! Nature in action for sure! HAPPY HALLOWEEN!
Eric - Warren T. said...
-
Lea, I saw this on your picture on your blog a while back. It still gives me the creeps when I see it now, just in time for Halloween. :)
--WT - tedm said...
-
very interesting Lea, I think that Praying Mantis' are known for biting the heads off their mates after mating? I didn't know they always did this. very interesting and eerie!
- Lea said...
-
Yeah, I had this on my blog but I thought I'd see what you guys thought of it too. Plus the whole Halloween thing... it's creepily festive :D
The other pic I have there showcases this fella's hollowed body... If you're up for another scare, it's in my August 2006 archives.
Nothing but Photoshop
With all of the discussion of the implications of post processing, I decided to upload a shot that is only possible with Photoshop. This is actually a scaled down HDR or high dynamic range shot. The original is a 32 bit image that is composed of three RAW shots, shot metered, +1ev and -1ev. The resulting file is a shot that contains all of the information and range of the three and is the closest we have that can approximate human vision. Unfortunately, I don't have a monitor capable of displaying the whole dynamic range. This shot is an 8 bit cut down of the original 32 bit image.
Without Photoshop, the shot would not be possible. Meter off the stain glass and the shot will be black. Meter off the church and the stain glass will be blown out. Canon 5D with 16-35L f2.8. Tripod used.
4 Comments:
- SteveR said...
-
Wow-a beautiful example, beautifully done!
- tedm said...
-
Wow Steve, what a nice 3D-ish shot. I've heard of this technique of putting multiple shots together to increase dynamic range, very nice! I wonder if in 5 or 10 years this feature might be built into cameras, having them take 3+ shots, and then crank out a JPG with the same dynamic range??
- Lea said...
-
It is really a gorgeous pic! I love the light coming in the stain glass windows. Even though the place is empty, this scene is curiously warm and inviting.
- Warren T. said...
-
Nice Tom!
I like this version more than the previous shot that you posted from this location. (http://fpcf.blogspot.com/2006/08/hitting-limit.html)
Did you use the same technique on the previous shot?
--Warren
Thursday, October 26, 2006
Smoke Break
Dave's journal, in a sense, was the Mother Of All PhotoBlogs - it was in essence a blog before there was such a thing.
Dave is a great B&W photographer and a great street photographer. I never shoot B&W any more and only seldom convert one of my digital images to B&W. But over the past few weeks, as I walk the final block on the way to work before I get to my building, I've been seeing small groups of smokers sitting on the window ledges of the Candler Building along Pratt Street. If I walk very close to the building, I would often just see a few pairs of legs, a hand or two, and puffs of smoke, backlit by the early-moning sun.
Those little scenarios started to strike me as "compositional," and Black-and-White-y. Well, yesterday, I finally snapped a few shots, with B&W in mind as the final product.
I rather like it, and hope you do, too. I'm curious to see what Dave thinks.
1 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
I agree, this picture probably works best as a B&W. I find that the most interesting part of this shot is the hand and the smoke wafting from the cigarette.
--WT
Tuesday, October 24, 2006
Monday, October 23, 2006
The Glorified Rainbow
It was rainy.. so of course the sky was very grey but as I stood at the shore watching some friends head out in the canoes, I saw a pretty little rainbow!
By increasing the saturation, I think I've kept the essense of this photo -- the reason I took it was because of that rainbow.
Vision is not realistic. Sit two people infront of a painting and they may see absolutely different things. It is the emotion associated with a picture that gives it it's punch. What does it evoke in its viewers.
A photo is that which is recorded by a camera, true. And editing it afterwards, perhaps, is changing an image from a photograph to a picture. But where do we draw the line? Sharpening little things here or there.. brightening a photo.. changing colours..
I don't really consider myself a photographer yet, so my views may be way different from everybody elses here.... eep...
17 Comments:
- tedm said...
-
I like it Lea. I'm reading a photo book that tries to draw the line at post processing, then digital manipulation, however, I think "removing satellite dishes" fell into the post processing section ;)
I used to pride myself on not cropping or using picassa, but I think I'm getting older and losing my edge ;)
At least I don't use Photoshop ... yet ;) - Eric said...
-
Lea:
Nice pic. I like that rainbow. To me, post-processing, whether it be in a wet darkroom or on my laptop with Photoshop, is a part of the whole artistic process. It's a really excellent photographer who never has to modify a photo at least just a little bit. I remember when I took my photo classes, my teacher said that there is no perfect photo. A person can alway improve it whether it be by taking it again (and again and again...) or by working on it in the darkroom.
Eric - Lea said...
-
Thanks for the feedback :)
When I first started taking photos I never cropped or altered anything either. But when I was introduced to Photoshop, I quickly surrendered and became a fan. In the beginning, I was only cropping or adding a little frame around the photo and basically scoffed at any other changes I would make.. thinking that I was not displaying things the way they were meant to be displayed.
But then a few times I'd do some editing and show my boyfriend and quite often he seemed to like the altered ones better... And so it began -- a fun journey to Photoshop-Land where every picture can be accessorized and pampered to create something new.
I may be subjecting myself to the perils of endless post-manipulation, but I'm ok with that if everyone else is, LOL. - Warren T. said...
-
Nice rainbow picture, Lea!
Only you can decide where you draw the line on digital manipulation. IMO, it is most definitely not a sign of weakness or some sort of lesser form of art if an image requires post-processing. Unless you are shooting slides for projection where there is no opportunity for manipulation of the transparency's image, the post-processing of the negative or original digital file is a vital part of a photographer's creative process. It was no different in the days before the digital darkroom. Because the camera/lens/film is not always able to capture exactly what you see with your eye, post-processing is required to complete your personal vision when you first snapped the shutter.
--Warren - Eric said...
-
Lea: Think of it this way. A computer loaded with Photoshop or another photo processing software is just like a darkroom 20 yrs ago. It's just that you do it on a computer. I'll bet Matthew Brady (famous photographer in the American Civil War) would have liked processing on a computer.
Eric - tedm said...
-
not quite, imho. I had a darkroom 20 years ago, 30 years ago as well, and couldn't do 90% of the things one can do with image manipulation that PS can do.
- Warren T. said...
-
Ted, I interpreted Eric's comment to mean that the CONCEPT of having to do post-processing 20 years ago in the darkroom is similar to using Photoshop on a computer today. I didn't think that he meant that you could do everything then that you can do now digitally.
For me, everything that I once did 30 years ago in the darkroom, I can do today much more conveniently on my computer. And just because I can do certain things now that I couldn't do then doesn't mean that I will do them. It goes back to the personal limits that we have on the extent of the digital manipulation that we find acceptable.
BTW, great discussion everybody.
--Warren - Eric said...
-
All:
Correct, the concept of post-processing a long while back is like using Photoshop today. I used to think that computer was "impure" for some reason. Not so. It's just different.
Eric - tedm said...
-
Hi Warren and Eric,
Those are very good points, and after reflecting a bit, I think you are both correct.
I'm having a personal internal struggle with digital editing that I'm still reconciling with.
For example, Warren and I worked on an image together that had a blue tint all over it, and the first time I showed it was the original unedited JPG out of the camera. I was proud in that I hadn't done any pp to get that blue, but in effect by accidently leaving my DSLR on the "wrong" WB setting, I was possibly doing an image manipulation of the raw data that one would do in PS, only I did it accidently ... I guess for art (but not necessarily documentary, forensics, etc.), anything in pp is fair game. I'm still thinking hard about this. - Lea said...
-
Love the philosophical outbreak that has occurred here! And I'm glad that my Photoshopping propensity has been welcomed warmly -- thanks everyone :D
- Warren T. said...
-
Very good points, Tom.
Didn't a photographer or news agency recently get in trouble for publishing a doctored photo? That's definitely a no-no.
When we were shooting weddings and portraits in the "old days", to make people look their best, we had to pay attention to:
Posing
Lighting
Camera angle and perspective
Focal Length
Filtration
Film properties
All of which still apply today in the digital age. (you still need to make an original image as good as possible, because some things just can't be corrected digitally)
--WT - Eric said...
-
Exactly. Some things just can't be corrected digitally. If a photo is not right from the beginning, it may never be right. Bad composition, etc. Hey, this is fun.
Eric - Lea said...
-
I agree totally that the foundation must be quality. Similar to building a house on a proper foundation. You shouldn't waste your time building a house if it's going to fall down the side of the mountain when it rains.
But more precisely, what exactly is quality foundation? I don't think there is any proper answer. It is up to the post-processing artist to see something special in the original and know how to bring it out.
Abstractly, I think that any photograph can be given a purpose and please an audience. It may not match the audience the photographer first seeked to serve... and I'm going guess that that's what differentiates a professional from an amateur.
Professionals will be able to get that perfect shot in a feasible manner. An amateur will find an audience for the photograph :)
I'm most likely an amateur right now. Perfection is stressful :P - Warren T. said...
-
Martin was a working professional photojournalist. Hey Martin! Are you lurking out there?!? We'd love to hear your insights on this subject. :).
And what about you other lurkers?
I think this comment thread is the longest in the history of this forum. Thanks Lea, for sparking the very interesting conversation!
And BTW, I consider you a PHOTOGRAPHER.
--Warren - SteveR said...
-
Wow, this is really a great thread!! I'm finding everyone's input very valuable.
As for me, I love the ability to exercize some control over the final photo by using photo-editing software.
When I got back into photography around 2002, my son Ben and I set up a little back-alley darkroom in little utility room, next to the washer & dryer. I got some Dektol, D-76, fixer and stop bath and a bunch of bottles. It was a lot of fun to teach Ben the basics, and I enjoyed it for about 2 or 3 days.
But then, I found that after a long day at work, starting to do some printing around 8pm and staying up past 11 to *maybe* get 1 good print .... well, I just no longer had the patience to do that at 52 the way I did in my 20's.
Within a few months, I pretty much switched to all digital, all the time, and haven't looked back. I do see so many good photographers who still do great work with Tri-X and some chemicals. And then there are many, like Dave Beckerman, who are hybrids - Dave develops his film, then scans the negatives and goes to town on them with Photoshop, Alien Skin, Noise Ninja, etc.
Different strokes for different folks - and it's all good!
BTW, Lea, I agree with Warren, you ARE a photographer.
Now you have to start going to those meetings, you know, the ones where you stand up in front of the group and say, "Hi, my name is Lea, and.. I'm a photographer." - Eric said...
-
Lea, you've been bitten by the bug whether you know it or not or whether you are going to admit it to yourself or not. You have the proverbial monkey on your back - shooting all kinds of pictures!
Eric - Lea said...
-
I accept this gracious offer to wear a photographer's hat! How very generous of you all to present it to me.
SPEECH SPEECH they chant, LOL..
I'm glad I found this forum :) Awesome photos, and now I see that your thoughts are also interesting -- I hope to hear more of them in the future!
Father & Daughter
This is a lucky shot I caught at the tail end of Baltimore Flugtag.
I had been taking photos during the event with my Canon Digital Rebel and 70-300mm zoom, racked out to 300mm to get pictures of the "airplanes" plunging into the harbor.
Luckily, I still had the long lens on the camera when I spotted this young father with his baby girl battened snugly inside his coat.
It reminded me of the rear cover of Paul McCartney's first solo album.
2 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Very cute :).
It does remind me of that album cover.
BTW, did you get any interesting shots of the event?
--WT - SteveR said...
-
thanks, Warren.
Yes, I posted some photos on my blog at:
http://therosenblog.blogspot.com/2006/10/flugtag-baltimore.html
It was a great event - if you ever get a chance to attend one of these, take it!
Sunday, October 22, 2006
Alley Plants
Here's another shot from the Canonet near my office. In this part of the neighborhood, these folx took time to beautify the front of their home. I took it on a sunny day, and afterwards I just wanted to sit on the sidewalk and just relax. They did a nice job with it. I hope my pic communicates that.
Eric
Saturday, October 21, 2006
Friday, October 20, 2006
1 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Martin, you're on a roll! This is a beautiful abstract! The shape of the light is very thought provoking and pleasant to view.
--Warren
1 Comments:
- Lea said...
-
Beautiful shot!
I am left wanting more colour from it though.. Maybe because the beachy area would be more distinguishable from the grassy regions.
Just a thought :)
Thursday, October 19, 2006
2 Comments:
- tedm said...
-
Wow, lots of great photos here recently. You really have a good eye for lines Warren. Very eye catching how the top of the walkway fence throughout the photo and 90 deg. turn in to the house or bldg. keep parallel to the top of the photo.
- Warren T. said...
-
Thanks Ted. Yeah, the forum has been very busy lately, which is great!!!
--WT
Upcoming Photo Op - Sat. Oct. 21st in S.F.
This announcement is for our photogs in the S.F. Bay Area.
Sorry it's such short notice, but I didn't think of it until yesterday :).
Last year, I volunteered my time to help the organizer of the annual Chinatown Health Fair, take pictures of the event. I had a lot of fun, and it was an interesting and challenging photo assignment. You may remember that I posted a few shots here on the forum from last year's event.
I was emailing with Kent Woo, who is executive director of NICOS Chinatown Health Coalition and organizer of the event, and he agreed that it would be a great idea to ask you if you're available to help shoot the event. This would take some pressure off of him (for taking pictures) so that he can concentrate on other event related issues.
The photos that we take may be used by NICOS in upcoming newsletters and promotional materials.
Time and Place:
Saturday, October 21st, 2006
Cameron House
920 Sacramento Street
Fair hours: 10am to 3pm
I will be there around Noon. I think it will be very cool to post some pictures here to compare our different photographic visions. Hmmm, now what gear should I use that day.... :)
I hope to see some of you there! Let me know if you're going.
--Warren
3 Comments:
- Benson said...
-
Sorry I'll be busy that day and won't be available.
I wanted to make a brief mention that I like the smile of the girl on the left. I should because she happens to be a patient of mine! Got her braces off last year. - Warren T. said...
-
Funny coincidence! This picture was taken at last year's fair (10/15/2005).
--WT - Eric said...
-
I told Kent I cannot. Gonna be out all day at Spreckles Lake.
Eric
Tuesday, October 17, 2006
Seeing Orange
I was driving in the neighborhood this morning when out of the corner of my eye, I saw these orange boards on some scaffolding, glowing in the morning light. I circled back, parked the car, and got the camera out of the trunk to take some shots.
I'm really not sure if these are worthy of showing here. Any thoughts?
--Warren
3 Comments:
- SteveR said...
-
It's really a beautiful photo, Martin!
Rolleicord, Tri-X - good on ya! - Eric said...
-
Hey, I have a photolike this hanging on my wall at home! I took it about 12 yrs ago with a Yashica 50 mm lens and Ilford HP film. My wife (girlfriend at the time) watched my back as I took the shots. Did it at midnight.
Good shot, Martin.
Eric - Warren T. said...
-
This is another beautiful shot!
Since this is on medium format, it would probably look great as poster-sized enlargement.
I was just about to mention that I saw a similar night shot of the Bay Bridge hanging on Eric's wall, but Eric posted his comment first.
--Warren
Presidio Wildflower
I was walking the 1 mile loop trail at Ft. Winfield Scott in the Presidio. The signs tout the fact that the old fort's buildings were designed in the "mission revival" style, but to my eyes they just looked like old army barracks. Most of the barracks have not yet been "reclaimed", so they stand abandoned and neglected. I saw this refreshing splash of color sprouting out from the base of one of these buildings.
--Warren
1 Comments:
- Lea said...
-
Yes, those green leaves and flowers in the first pic look like they're popping their faces out to see who's there. They remind me of little children waiting to see their mommy & daddy when they get home. Jumping all over the place. Cute and animated.
Personification in photography... cool :) Never thought about that before..
Monday, October 16, 2006
Jason & Mary Wedding
We were sitting in the 2nd row in the audience, not a very good angle but I did the best I could. These were shot with available light using the J-8 wide open and a slow shutter speed.
Here the bride seemed to be looking straight at my camera:
"The Kiss":
--Warren
3 Comments:
- Lea said...
-
awwwwww :)
What a beautiful picture! - martin said...
-
Nice skin tones. What film is this? I tried to look up SG400 and could not find it. I like the kiss photo, the red of the bridesmaids gowns add color to the photo but maybe detract from the bride and groom.
- Warren T. said...
-
The film is Kodak SuperGold 400. I think it's an import nomenclature. I bought a small batch from B&H a while back, and the packaging had Japanese characters on it. I'm not sure what the domestic equivalent is called. I just checked B&H just now, and it's no longer listed as a film choice.
--Warren
Sunday, October 15, 2006
Sunlight and Wind
I shot this one once again near the old Power Plant building, but from the other side, standing on a bridge that links the Aquarium area to Pier Six.
I think it has an Impressionist feel to it - but other than the Levels adjustment in Photoshop, there was no digital manipulation of the image - it's all sunlight and wind.
A Sightseeing Break
Nikon D100, Tamron 24-135mm
My camera tandem today was the D100 w/Tamron 24-135mm and the Bessa R w/VC 35mm f2.5. I needed to finish a roll of film in the Bessa, but as usual I brought the D100 along. I decided to explore the Presidio some more today.
This guy was taking pictures with his cell phone camera.
--Warren
Saturday, October 14, 2006
Running :)
I have never done a race before like this with the roads blocked off and so many people. It was alot of fun. I hope to do more races!
Tedm's post on Oct 7 about digital editing got me thinking. Mostly, it has left me with the desire to try out some digital editing of my own. I am using Photoshop. But I am not very advanced yet.
I removed some of the shadows. Increased saturation. Increased contrast.
Perhaps I will try more in the future...
4 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Interesting shot, Lea. It's kind of mysterious... what was holding up the t-shirt?
Keep practicing on PS. You'll be amazed at how a little bit of adjustment can sometimes make a huge difference in a picture.
--Warren - tedm said...
-
Lea, I like it very much. Your edits were subtle. If you didn't tell me you made pp edits, I would have thought of it as just a very perfect photo under great lighting.
- Lea said...
-
Yeah, the picture was very dark to begin with so I spiced it up a little -- Thanks for the encouraging comments :)
There is one of those fitness balls holding it up. They are a little grippy so I put the shirt on it. Right after I took the pic, it fell off so it was good timing :D
I wanted something with a similar blue as the writing to be behind it. - Eric said...
-
Lea:
Good shot. It is very focused (the idea that is) and it communicates well. No doubt about what you are saying. Not bad a bad editing job either. Perhaps just cropping the right side a little would have made for a tighter picture.
Eric
Thursday, October 12, 2006
5 Comments:
- tedm said...
-
I really like the lines of the fence, and the shadow, along with the shades of blue, with the deck, and the black shadow. Very nice!
- Warren T. said...
-
Thanks Ted.
Hey Everyone, I changed the main page of this blog to show 14 days instead of 7 days. Because of the number of pictures posted, things were scrolling off the page too fast. What do you think, 14 days or 7 days like before?
--Warren - SteveR said...
-
Nice composition! I like the way the fence extends to bottom left corner and then goes up to about 2/3 of the way to top right. Those proportions really look nice to me.
How about trying this in B&W - I think it would also be a successful B&W image, but with a different look.
I like the 14-day new look. - Warren T. said...
-
Thanks!
I was in the process of converting this to B&W just to try it, but then I liked the shades of blue in here so much that I decided to leave it as color, so I posted the color version.
When I have time, I'll try it again in B&W.
--WT - Dolph Brust said...
-
14 days as long as we keep the posts going
Wednesday, October 11, 2006
3 Comments:
- Dolph Brust said...
-
Nice use of lines, shadows and angles. Nice shot.
- tedm said...
-
Steve, very nice, it also reminded me of Warren's "empty".
If it were my photo, I would try looking at it by cropping out the bottom 1/3rd, and the right 1/5th, but then again, I'd be dead without my "undo" buttons in my SW ;) - Eric said...
-
Nice shot, Steve. I like the lines.
Eric
10 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
I like the nice morning colors and the stillness of the reflection on the building shot. It's a classic composition for a classicly designed structure.
The foggy tree shot reminds me of a Chinese brush painting, nice layering.
Nice perspective and layering on the skyline shot too, but contrast is a bit low, and the bright window reflections detract a bit.
Cool stuff, Martin!
--Warren - Warren T. said...
-
Martin's new Internet handle: SF-FogMan
:P - Warren T. said...
-
Hey Ted, how's Seattle? Is it raining? :)
How about some shots from Seattle when you're up there?
--Warren - tedm said...
-
Hey Warren -- I delayed returning for a week, I have a temp project going on right now. I like Martin's cloud photos. I think one of the current magazines on the shelves covers shooting fog, but I think Martin has it nailed!!
- SteveR said...
-
These are wonderful, Martin - very nice compositions, and in each one, you captured a wonderful mood.
- Dolph Brust said...
-
Martin,
Nice shots. Have you ever tried early morning on Hwy 92 and Skyline lookingdown onto Crystal Spring Res? I drove that for 20 years and fog with the different looks was always great. I wanted to get out and take a picture, but I was always in a hurry to get to work. I love the fog, and miss it. Keep these coming! - Lea said...
-
You know, sometimes you just see some pictures and there is this burst of energy that hits you. And when you try to put words to it, nothing really fully expresses what you feel. Sometimes a functional curse does the trick. Let me try.
Holy crap, I love these f#@*ing pictures Martin!
Well, it's the closest I can come to my love for these shots :)
Fantastic. - Warren T. said...
-
Really Lea, you need to tell us how you REALLY feel :) :P.
Yeah, this is Martin's modus operandi, lay low for weeks, maybe months at a time, then BAM! he hits us with some real eye popping pictures (or at the very least, a pithy comment or two).
--Warren - Lea said...
-
Words have failed me, lol.
... or maybe it is I who have failed words? hm.
Whatever Martin is using as his means of getting a good shot, I must say -- I think it is working. - martin said...
-
Thanks for the comments. I often go out walking without my camera and I see photo opportunities. I say to myself, gee, that would make a good photo. Then there are other times, I would have my camera and not "see" any good photos. That morning last month, I was up around 7am going out for my morning coffee and I noticed the low fog. I quickly got my camera and drove north to Lincoln Park as I had been there many times before and only made so-so pictures. What I found was the low fog and if you went to the top of the hill where the museum was you could see clear sky. Like Warren probably does, we both scout locations looking for photo possibilities. We make mental notes as to when good photos can be made much like Ansel Adams did when he photographed Yosemite. This is one time where the conditions were near perfect.
2 Comments:
Eric,
I like this version better than the previous one. Nice job on the contrast enhancement.
--WT
Thx. I need to play with contrast more when taking the pic and when playing with it in Photoshop.
Eric
Post a Comment