Monday, January 31, 2005

So Let Me Introduce to You...


Greetings from SteveR! Posted by Hello

It occured to me that I hadn't yet properly introduced myself, so here goes...

I grew up in the suburbs of Baltimore, Maryland, but moved to Manhattan in the mid-70's. While I was living there, I met my wife, Sandy. I've been married to Sandy, a wonderful girl from the Anglophone side of Montréal, for almost 25 years. We have two great kids, Leah 22 and Ben 18. and have lived near Annapolis, Maryland since Ben was 3 months old. Last week, I turned 55 years old. So much for the stats.

A few weeks after I graduated from high school in 1967, my friend Roger showed me how to develop B&W film and prints. The very first time I saw one of my images start to emerge under the safelight, I was hooked.

My first camera was Dad's old German-made Kodak Retina I - a beautiful rangefinderless folding 35mm camera with a good Schneider lens. Roger gave me one of his Dad's old 1940's-style GE light meters, and I was on my way.

Within a year, I bought my first serious camera, a 1965 Nikon F, Photomic T. Around the time I moved to New York City, I switched to a couple of Olympus OM-1's and even had a Leica IIIf, an M-3, and a Minolta CL at one time. In short, I was an enthusiastic amateur all during the '70s, shooting B&W that I developed in my Manhattan kitchen and Kodak slide film.

All that somehow stopped in 1980 or '81, when marriage, first house, and raising a family gave me new priorities. I sold all my cameras, and photography for the next many years meant family photos using Sandy's Canon Sure-Shot (not that their's anything wrong with that!)

The spark came back to me in 2001, and now I'm back into photography stronger than ever. Although I re-started my born-again photographic life with some wonderful old metal-mechanical-manual cameras and film, since mid-2003 I've gone all digital.

Although we live on opposite coasts, Warren and I "met" each other through the "Commie Camera Forum," thanks to our mutual obsession... uhhh.... I mean, interest, in cameras from the Former Soviet Union.

Athough my job is as a database developer and I work with PCs all day every day, I'm still amazed at how PCs and the Internet have enabled people like us, with common interest, to come together - distance and location is no longer an issue!

I'd like to thank Warren for setting up this great forum for us to share and enjoy.

Best regards,
SteveR

1 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Steve, one of these days, we'll need to collaborate on something on the subject of parallel (or at least closely similar) lives while living on separate coasts. And we'll have to convert you back to shooting Nikons! :)

I once had a setup that converted the tiny bathroom in my parents' house into a full darkroom for my black & white developing and printing.

And I agree, we would not have met had it not been for the Internet and the current state of electronic communications. BTW, I'm also in the IT field (25 years now).

I'm thrilled that you decided to join us!

-- Warren

Monday, January 31, 2005 at 10:11:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment


Toy Guitar - Canon Digital Rebel w/ Canon EF-S 18-55mm, 1/200 @ f/6.3 ISO 400 Posted by Hello

My wife says I'm a junkaholic, and this photo proves it!

This toy guitar was sitting with a pile of other cool stuff that someone in the neighborhood left to be picked up as garbage. I liked the color and the shape, so I ventured to take a few photos. The guitar was sitting on a small nightstand, and I just let most of it hang over the edge while outside the frame, I held the bottom part with one hand. The mottled background is just good old Anne Arundel County street paving.

- SteveR

2 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

The first thing that came to my mind when I saw this picture before reading the notes was: Catalog Shot. It has great color and composition, and not being a musician, I would have believed it if you told me that it was a "real" instrument. I also first thought that you shot the guitar in front of some sort of studio background. Did you do any photoshop work on the background to blur it?

Thanks for posting!

-- Warren

Monday, January 31, 2005 at 7:42:00 AM PST  
Blogger SteveR said...

Hi Warren - thanks for your kind comments!

It was just dumb luck the background (old blacktop paving) came out the way it did. I just tried to make sure it was uncluttered when I shot it, but it wasn't until I brought the image up in Photoshop on my monitor that I realized how studio-background-like it came out to be. I credit it to the large aperture and having the zoom lens at it's full 55mm telephoto end. No photoshopping on the background at all.

For the photo as a whole, I just adjusted the levels and used very moderate sharpening with an Unsharp Mask.

-- SteveR

Monday, January 31, 2005 at 8:59:00 AM PST  

Post a Comment

Sunday, January 30, 2005


Mr. White Cat at Bob's House, Nikon D100, 50mm f1.8D, 1/45 f3.5 Posted by Hello

Notes: Our friends Bob & Joao are fellow cat lovers. They have a pair of indoor Burmans, Lucy & Linus. They also feed an outside cat who has been coming around the back porch for food for around 10 years. They think that he once belonged to someone, but somehow ended up in the wild. They don't let him inside because of the possibility of disease being transmitted to Lucy & Linus. One day, Mr. White Cat disappeared and didn't come back for a couple of years. They thought that he died. He just reappeared one day as if nothing had happened. Mr. White Cat is scruffy, and he has a haunting look in his eyes. If only he could tell us of his experiences.

Shooting through the tattered screen door, I thought it looked almost like a painting.

-- Warren

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Saturday, January 29, 2005


Pier 14 on the Waterfront, Nikon D100, Sigma 15-30mm @ 15mm, 1/250 f16 Posted by Hello

Notes: Here's another from the waterfront series. I saw the converging lines of the pier and bridge, and I decided to see if I can get a decent shot using the ultrawide Sigma zoom. It looks like you can walk to Treasure Island via the pier.

Where are you guys? Is anyone still looking at these?

--Warren

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Wednesday, January 26, 2005


SF-Oakland Bay Bridge, Nikon D100, Tamron 24-135mm @65mm, 1/500 f11 Posted by Hello

Notes: Yes, I know, this is your standard postcard shot of a City landmark, probably of interest only to tourists, right? This is part of my series from the recent waterfront walk & shoot. This shot is cropped, I cropped the woman and cell phone out of the bottom of the picture. The sun angle was perfect to light up the bridge towers. It really highlighted them, and I liked the look. Folks, I feel like I'm posting pictures into the twilight zone. I need to know that I'm not wasting my time here. Any form of acknowledgement will work.

Thanks for reading.

-- Warren

3 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Jill, thanks for the comments! I REALLY appreciate it. You're right, I may have chopped off too much of the water under the bridge. There was a railing there. The woman with the phone was there too. I'll have to look at the original to see how much water is there. As for the lighting, a lot of it has to do with being at the right place at the right time, and being able to "see" and recognize it.

-- Warren

Tuesday, February 1, 2005 at 10:04:00 AM PST  
Blogger Dennis Fong said...

Standard Postcard? Maybe...But pick 10 tourist walking by at the same time and maybe only one would get close to the shot and composition as good as this. Lighting is everything in photography, and knowing your equipment well enough to capture it to be "postcard perfect" is not as easy as most would think.

I agree with Jill...more water would balance and feel better. I would also try to eliminate the post of some sort on the lower right...a slight distraction.

Lighting is great. It would be interesting to see a series on the bridge with other lighting, such as sunset/sunrise, or moonrise!
Lighting is fantastic.

Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 9:10:00 PM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Thanks Dennis. I went back to the original shot and I saw that just under that sliver of water on the bottom was the concrete railing. the woman's head was positioned just above the railing. I felt that in this composition, the railing and woman would distract from the main subject, which was the bridge.

Given the transitive nature of certain scenes, there is not much time to attain perfection, but the exciting, fun, and stimulating challenge (at least for me), is to get the optimum shot given the particular circumstances. For example, I saw that lightpost on the right side of the picture at the time. To exclude the lightpost, I would have had to change my position and focal length, but that would have spoiled the appearance of the bridget that I wanted. Also, I was not sure yet if I wanted to include the woman in this shot, so I had her positioned in the ideal position, and I didn't want to take too long before clicking by walking around to remove the lightpost. In order to be unobtrusive, I took 4 shots of this scene in about 30 seconds. On one of them, I excluded the lightpost, but I didn't like it as much as this one because of the reason mentioned above. I posted one of the other shots previously, where I liked the appearance of the woman in the foreground. I thought that one added drama even though nobody commented on it. The "thought" of postprocessing is ever present in the mind, but the goal is to achieve as much perfection (or how you envisioned the final image) in-camera as possible. Just musing on some ideas, I hope you found it interesting.

-- Warren

Thursday, February 3, 2005 at 7:38:00 AM PST  

Post a Comment

Tuesday, January 25, 2005


Seen on the SF Waterfront, Nikon D100, Sigma 18-35mm. Posted by Hello

Notes: I liked the black/white pattern, then I decided to add the whimsical mannequin on the side who looked like he was reading the poem.

-- Warren

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Sunday, January 23, 2005


SF Bay Bridge Scene, Nikon D100, Tamron 24-135mm @ 105mm, 1/1000 f8 Posted by Hello

Notes: We went for brunch today (Sunday, 1/23/2005) at Town's End Restaurant on the Embarcadero & Townsend Street. I decided to shoot the D100 today with the zoom lenses (18-35mm and 24-135mm). We walked from the restaurant to the Ferry Building and back. On the way to the Ferry Building, I was shooting the 18-35mm when I came upon this woman talking on her cell phone with the Bay Bridge in the background. I took a few shots with that lens, and I continued walking because it was too wide for what I was looking for. I didn't think any more about it, but on the walk back to the car about half an hour later, I decided to mount the 24-135mm just to get a different perspective for the other direction. I found that the woman was still there talking on her phone, and the light was even better than the first time I saw her, so I grabbed a few more shots, this time with the right lens.

-- Warren

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Sunday, January 16, 2005


Tulip Field in Butchart Gardens, Victoria, Canada -- Konica Hexar w/35mm f2.0, Fuji Sensia slide film Posted by Hello

Notes: This was taken in the mid-90's. I thought the Konica Hexar was the answer for my desire for an affordable camera that had the handling qualities of a Leica M. The Konica was the identical size and shape of a classic early Leica M series rangefinder. It had an absolutely superb 35mm f2.0 . The lens was critically sharp, had good color rendition, and excellent bokeh. The Hexar featured such innovations as built-in winder, auto exposure, and autofocus. The original version also featured an ultra-quiet mode that really worked. This could have been the perfect street camera. The problem that caused me to eventually sell the camera was the Hexar's poor AF performance. It did not have a manual focusing aid, so to focus the camera, you have to rely solely on it's AF sensor, and it was too inaccurate for my standards.

I took the camera as my only camera on a short trip to Canada. Butchart Gardens was in full springtime bloom and tulips were everywhere. I noticed the color transition and shape of this particular patch and decided to try for a field shot with a different look.

--Warren

2 Comments:

Blogger SteveR said...

The flowers and the color are really beautiful, but the thing that really attracts me to this photo is the gentle "S"-curve made by the tulips on the green background. If the "S"-curve had been all one color, that would have been great, but as a bonus, the color changes further up the curve.

Monday, January 31, 2005 at 4:35:00 AM PST  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Thanks Steve, I didn't mention the S-curve because I was hoping someone would notice it and say something about it :).

Monday, January 31, 2005 at 8:08:00 AM PST  

Post a Comment

Monday, January 03, 2005


Carmel Mission, Carmel, Calfornia, Nikon D100, 24mm f2.8 AF, 1/200 f8. Posted by Hello

Notes: Gail and I managed to escape on a very short, one night trip to Carmel in between taking care of my father who has not been well. It had been raining all week, but as we arrived in Carmel, the rain turned to intermittent showers. After lunch we decided to visit Carmel Mission to try taking some pictures there. I was actually shooting with the F4s w/50mm lens and Gail was using the D100 w/24mm. While in the courtyard, I noticed a fountain and I wanted to incorporate the mission and fountain into the same shot. I took a few with people standing next to the fountain, but I chose to post this one. Rather than swap lenses, I just decided to swap cameras in order to take advantage of the 24mm on the D100.

--Warren

1 Comments:

Blogger Dennis Fong said...

I tend to look at details to give me clues to what I'm looking at, so I'm dying to see more of the fountain's centerpiece in the photo. At the same time, the white inside wall of the fountain, along with it's dimmer reflection, seem to dominate a significant area of the center of the image, distracting me from the building behind. I think what would look dynamic is a horizontal image, with more water/less fountain wall, and more centerpiece.

Monday, January 3, 2005 at 10:19:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment