Monday, July 02, 2007

Portraits

Hi everyone! I'm still alive, lurking in the forum, but just couldn't motivate myself to do much photo-taking or posting until the last few weeks. I finally put this post on my photo-blog and thought I'd share it with you.

I've been trying to work in some informal portraiture lately. Here are two of what I think are my more successful attempts.

Portraits were what originally impelled me to take up photography. That is, I was so dissatisfied with my high school yearbook picture that I was sure I could learn to do a better job. Not realizing that the problem was the raw subject material and not the fault of any photographer, I prevailed on my friend Roger to teach me about photography. Once I got in the darkroom and became fascinated with the ability to make images, any images, I soon forgot about portraiture.

People pictures, other than those of cute, small children, have never been my strong point. I don't think I really want to go through the effort to be a really great portraitist, but I'd like to at least get better at photographing family and friends.

Composition is my strong point, so I've been looking out for opportunities to combine composition and informal portraiture.

John G at WorkI really like this photo of my friend and co-worker John. First of all, I caught an expression that I think really represents John well. He is pleasant to be around, collegial and professional with a good sense of humor - a real mentch. Second, from a compositional point of view, I like the way the swoopy curve of the desk balances the placement of John on the right side of the photo. Overall, I think it turned out to be a decent "environmental" portrait of a happy software developer.

Ben on Lake MuscocaThis next photo is, of course, our son Ben. He's an easy one to photograph, as he usually doesn't mind mugging or posing for the camera. In this case, he was just relaxing on my brother-in-law Peter's boat during our recent visit to Toronto. I thought the boat's wake on this beautiful day was a photogenic backdrop for a portrait, and the way Ben was leaning made for a more interesting photo.

OK, it's not Annie Liebovitz, but a good start.



Speaking of Annie Liebovitz, I recently took a long look at her much-heralded new book, A Photographer's Life: 1990-2005. Frankly, at $75, I don't recommend it. Many of the photos, maybe a fourth of them, are quite compelling, but the layout is not very good - many fine photos are splayed across two pages, ruined by the gutter. Further, I question if the other three-quarters of the photo are worth publishing.

Some have complained that most of the photos are just what you would find in a family album - pictures of Liebovitz' parents, cousins, and her lover Susan Sontag, over the 15-year period. I would defend her to an extent here - some of the family photos are excellent, both in the emotions they convey and in their photographic quality. But many, many more are not so good.

There are probably more photos of Sontag than any other subject in this book. A few are quite good, but most seem to be only of personal interest to Liebovitz, perhaps to Sontag's family, and maybe to Sontag fanatics. A number of these are just downright bad photos - blurred or poorly exposed.

The book also includes some landscapes, many spread across two pages. These latter ones aren't ruined by the gutter, because Liebovitz' landscapes, at least in this book, are unimpressive - perhaps they have meaning to her, but I question that they have any wide appeal.

As a photographer, Liebovitz is a bit of a puzzle to me. Here's what I wonder: she is a very talented portrait photographer, but if her photos were of ordinary people rather than celebrities, would we be all that interested and make such a fuss over her?

I'd like to hear what you guys think.

5 Comments:

Blogger Lea said...

Nice pics --Great emotion in both of them & interesting backgrounds for portraits! Canadian water too! woohooo :)

As per your question about fussing over Leibovitz, my initial guess is no.. chances are her name wouldn't be nearly as well-known as it is. But that is something that she has made for herself -- her reputation. How did she build her collection? ...That really does say something about her as a photographer too. I don't know that much about her but I think that would definitely be interesting to know!

As with any form of production for others, there is much that goes unseen by the consumer. There is something very untouchable about being asked to photograph the Queen. Leibovitz's fame doesn't come only from getting well-known faces in her shots. She is also well known for working closely with her subjects while shooting. It's hard to separate the artist from their art. Aren't they one and the same? ...a depiction of their imagination & passion? More than likely, fame has been nothing more than a side note to her passion for illustrating famous people...


Sorry for being a bit long-winded, but it was an intriguing question Steve! :) And again --great pics here!!

Wednesday, July 4, 2007 at 7:04:00 PM PDT  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Hi Steve! It's great to see you here again. Thanks for a very interesting and thoughht provoking post!

I think both portraits are very successful. I like the fact that both of them have the "SteveR signature vision" backgrounds. You also captured great expressions on your subjects which is not surprising considering your relationships with them. John's picture can very be in a company newsletter or brochure. If there was one nit to pick (minor one), I would have moved the trash can out of the way :). I love the way the s-curve of the desk is reprised and continued by the brown curved pattern on the floor.

I was going to post something about Annie Liebovitz a couple of months ago after I saw a PBS documentary about her. Thanks for the review of her new book. I really didn't know much about her until after I saw the documentary on TV.

As for the question of whether or not Liebovitz would be fussed over if her portraits were of ordinary people, I think probably not, but I think she does deserve all her accolades because she made the most of it when the opportunity to photograph famous people presented itself. So, Liebovitz's fame are a product of her own talent and skill as a photographer combined with the unique circumstances of her job.

--Warren

Thursday, July 5, 2007 at 9:19:00 AM PDT  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Steve,

Question: Was John's portrait planned, or was it spontaneous/impromptu?

I find the all the colors in the frame (including John's shirt) to be very pleasing and harmonious.

Thanks,

Warren

Thursday, July 5, 2007 at 5:41:00 PM PDT  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Lea and Warren - thanks for your comments!

Lea - BTW, the Canadian water in the background behind Ben is Lake Muscoca - have you been there?

Warren - I didn't notice the trash can, even after editing the photo of John for about 15 min. to take out some stuff on the desk. Good eye - that's the kind of thing I would like to be aware of doing this kind of photography.

The photo was not really planned - I had my little A620 out for some other reason, and decided to snap a few "at work" photos of John. At one point, I held the camera high over my head, making use of the articulated LCD screen, and suddenly saw those curves in the desk and the floor - then just asked John to look up. It was OK but not all that great - but I thought that viewpoint had potential - then we did another take about a minute later, which was this one. I also complimented John on his fortuituous choice of shirt that day ;-)

Your part of your comment about the "SteveR signature vision" made my day! :-) :-)

I'll look for that documentary on Annie Liebovitz - that may soften my opinion

Best regards,
SteveR

Wednesday, July 18, 2007 at 6:34:00 PM PDT  
Blogger Lea said...

No I haven't been to Muskoka --my sis was up there this summer though, visiting relatives who live up there. I've heard & seen many a good things :D

Wednesday, July 18, 2007 at 9:18:00 PM PDT  

Post a Comment