Friday, June 30, 2006
Wednesday, June 28, 2006
3 Comments:
- Benson said...
-
That's really cool. It looks like a border affect that was done on the computer but I can see the actual border of the photo on the lower right. Seems like a pretty neat place to visit.
- Lea said...
-
yeah, that's a pretty cool shot! :D
- Eric said...
-
Looks like a ghost photo! I like it. When I first saw it, I thought you took it with a pinhole camera or something homemade then I read on.
Reminds of the portal on Star Trek when Capt Kirk and Spock went back to Depression Era U.S.
Eric
2 Comments:
- Eric said...
-
Wonderful photo!
- Lea said...
-
oooo, awesome sky! It almost flips to and from being a brilliant sky and some kind of volcanic underworld, erupting with magma flows everywhere. The people in the picture keep me grounded and viewing sky. It's as I daydream and look at the picture behind them that it flips to the volcanoes. Pretty cool photo Warren :)
Monday, June 26, 2006
3 Comments:
- Benson said...
-
I really like this photo. It is very simple and elegant. Reminds me of some of the ads you may see in a car magazine. Great catch!
- Eric said...
-
Cool shot. Looks like you did it in a studio.
Eric - Warren T. said...
-
Thanks guys. When I saw the interior of this car, I noticed that a ray of sunlight was illuminating the shift knob. I figured that by properly exposing the knob for details, the rest of the interior would be blacked out. When I got home, I saw that I was right, then I made the moon connection as I was looking at the image in Photoshop. I dodged (highlights) on the shift column to make sure that it was visible in the shot.
--WT
Saturday, June 24, 2006
2 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Interesting, compressed, telephoto perspective, and nice warm late afternoon color.
--WT - Eric said...
-
Thx. I'm starting to play more with the Photoshop tools. I used the healing tool to take out some reflections in the trees. It looked like there was a UFO back there. It was pretty funny!
Eric
Friday, June 23, 2006
2 Comments:
- Lea said...
-
I love this picture! It actually reminds me of the stuff you can make with Corel Bryce 5 (3D landscaping, modelling software). But this is of course so much better because I know it's real! I love waves coming in on the rocks and sand. It's almost like I can hear it :)
- Eric said...
-
Wow, thx Lea! I had to dress it up a bit with the Adobe Photoshop software, but it seemed to work.
Eric
Tuesday, June 20, 2006
Carnival Mask in North Beach
Eric
Monday, June 19, 2006
Da Vinci Codes
Sony DSC-D770
I just finished reading the Da Vinci Code. While walking down Pine Street the other day, I saw this gate at a local hotel, and I thought, "Hey, how many da Vinci clues are on there?!".
You can also see the limitations of a 1.5MP sensor because the image did not stand up well to cropping. You really need to compose in-camera and not rely too much on cropping during post-processing (like I did here).
--Warren
4 Comments:
- Benson said...
-
I think nowadays with the super-megapixel cameras, we can get lazy in composing pictures and rely on post-processing. Advantage? Disadvantage? I'd say a little of both. A shot like this is very difficult to compose right on the spot due to the very straight lines and trying to get them lined up with the sides of your frame. In the thumbnail it looked pretty good until I clicked on it for the larger view and you could see the pixelation. Overall great shot, I love the symmetry and contrast.
- Warren T. said...
-
The other difficulty was the fact that I would have been standing in the middle of busy Pine Street if I tried to compose in-camera. :)
If I wanted to do that badly enough, I suppose I could have.
--WT - Benson said...
-
See, there's a huge advantage for digital photography. The ability to grab a shot just because it looks interesting enough. Then be able to post-process it to make it look just the way you want it, without risking life and limb.
- Warren T. said...
-
In the old days (pre-digital), I still would have created the same image, except I would have done the same crop of the original image, but in a chemical darkroom instead of on my computer.
--WT
Sunday, June 18, 2006
playing with negative space
I went to downtown SF this past Saturday to take some shots. It was beautiful and I figured that the big public places would be target rich. Anyway, while on the subway, I got to thinking about the discussions in the past on using negative space. So, I tried playing around with it. I got a shot of this statue in Union Square (the shopping district). The sky was a nice shade of blue that day and I thought the statue stood out nicely against it.
Eric
2 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Cool shot, Eric!
I noticed some digital artifacts in the blue sky when viewing the full-sized image. I wonder what happened.
This is, of course, open to different interpretations, but there seems to be a feeling of tension and uncertainty in the image because the statue seems to be gazing right into the right edge of the frame. I wonder if the feeling would change if the subject was moved to the lower left instead, then the statue would be gazing into the open blue sky.
Just food for thought...
--WT - Eric said...
-
Thx. I know what you mean about the digital artifacts. I don't know what happened. I noticed it last nite. This is a good reason to still keep film handy.
You're right about feeling. I wasn't able to put it into words, but I was wondering what it would've looked like if the statue was in the lower left, too. I think you're right. The feeling would've been different.
Eric
Saturday, June 17, 2006
Thursday, June 15, 2006
House in Rhode Island
Eric
Wednesday, June 14, 2006
Taking a Break on the Trail
Nikon D100
Gail took a rest stop on our way back up the trail from the canyon floor at Canyon de Chelley in Arizona.
It was a beautiful day, but a bit hot on the trail. This was the only trail that visitors are allowed on without being accompanied by an indian guide.
We went to see the "white house" ruins. I'm picking random shots to post from our vacation. I may get to the pictures from these ruins one of these days.
--Warren
5 Comments:
- Lea said...
-
Cool shot! The bottom left part of the photo looks like it has great depth but I can't really tell.. it could be just a few metres too. Was it a huge drop from the path?
- Warren T. said...
-
Thanks Lea!
The canyon itself is about 600 feet from the rim to the floor. This trail has some switchbacks with pretty good drops. I would say that this particular spot on the lower left of the picture has an approximately 10 meter drop down to another part of the trail.
--Warren - Lea said...
-
Oh cool, so not that far down, relatively of course. I've spent most of my life in the prairies - no canyons anywhere near! Our big canyons are actually ditches, hahah :) I love seeing different kinds of scenery like this.
- Warren T. said...
-
Lea, I'll be posting more scenic pictures from my recent roadtrip. Stay tuned.
--Warren - Lea said...
-
ooooooooooo :)
I'm interested!
5 Comments:
- Eric said...
-
Very nice. What the heck is it?
Ej - Warren T. said...
-
Thanks! It's a bunch of soap balls on display at a Soap/Bath Supplies Store on Union Street.
--Warren - Eric said...
-
Is it a Freudian thing?
Ej - Warren T. said...
-
must be :)
--WT - Benson said...
-
When I first read the title I had images of a motorcycle rider in the winter, a man sitting on a block of ice, or something to that effect. This is one of those images that no one would guess what you took a picture of.
Tuesday, June 13, 2006
Sunday, June 11, 2006
Tuesday, June 06, 2006
Fun at the SF Zoo
This is our daughter Madison having a great time at the San Francisco Zoo. This picture was taken by my wife with a disposable film camera. Processing was through Costco's Kodak processing with a CD to digitize the prints. Not a very clear picture but not bad for a disposable. The Kodak processing at Costco is pretty good, in my opinion. And the convenience of having it on a CD so you don't have to scan all the prints or negatives is a plus.
There Warren. I've posted a project photo. ;-)
Monday, June 05, 2006
Sunday, June 04, 2006
Saturday, June 03, 2006
1 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Thanks for posting another beautiful Death Valley shot!
I love the leading lines from the little wind blown curves leading up to the big "S" curve, which in turn draws the eye to the mountains in the background. Great!
--Warren
Lens Shootout at Lincoln Park
Sigma 15-30mm
Tokina 17mm ATX
Nikon 18-70mm "kit" lens
Tokina 12-24mm
This session came about because Dennis was trying to decide which superwide lens to buy for use with his D100. I thought it would be cool to gather our existing wide angle lenses to let Dennis try them all at the same time. I borrowed Benson's 18-70mm and 12-24mm to use with my Sigma 15-30mm and Tokina 17mm (prime).
Can you tell which lens was used in each picture? The 18-70mm is probably easier to spot (when used at 50mm or longer). Like I mentioned before, I found that I basically forgot that we were testing lenses, and ended up just concentrating on making the pictures. We thought that all the lenses were very good.
--Warren
4 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
I forgot to ask you... which images are your favorites from this series? Just curious...
--WT - Eric said...
-
I like the 5th on up from the bottom. The one where you are looking down the hallway. I thought it was a b&w photo until I saw the splash of color on the top and right side.
You must've had a lot of fun.
Eric - Lea said...
-
Hi Warren!
#5, #10, and #15 are my favs.
Hmm, multiples of five... how perfect :)
They just really stand out to me. #5 is symmetric which is complementary to the building itself. It just cries out structure!
And I don't like #10 JUST because I'm a sucker for flower pics.. but your pic is like a sea of flowers bouyant on the green. They are so pretty :) I love it!
#15 is curiously inviting. Somewhere to take a little break, lol. Is that a windmill on the other side? - Warren T. said...
-
Hi Lea,
Nice to hear from you. Thanks for your comments.
It's nota windmill, it's a large metal sculpture.
--Warren
Friday, June 02, 2006
2 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Nice nature scene, is this near a town? Cool reflections too.
--WT - Eric said...
-
Thx, man. I took the photo when I was back in Natick. I love visiting the Charles River - esp now that it's clean.
When I was playing with it in Adobe Photoshop, I made it a little too sharp so I used the blur tool to calm it down. Thx for the info on how to use the unsharp mask and for suggesting that I tone down the sharpness in my Sony.
God, I can't wait till I get the scanner so I can do more film work. Digital is fun, but I miss film. Also, I think film keeps you honest and makes you work harder. You can't just look at what you took and delete it if it's bad. You're stuck with it, good or bad.
Eric
Thursday, June 01, 2006
Dynamic Dual
Shot with my D100.
Here are my two F4s cameras, as mentioned in my previous post, sitting on top of my HP 5400C flatbed scanner.
I bought the one on the right in the mid-1990's for about $1200 used, and it's been supremely reliable since then. I bought the one on the left, a late model body, last year for under $500 including a MF-23 multi-function back. I intended to sell my older F4 body after I got the newer one, but I can't bring myself to do it :).
If any of you (FPCF members) in the Bay Area want to try one of my F4's or any of my other cameras or lenses, just ask me.
--Warren
Summer is Almost Here
How is everyone doing? What are you up to?
This month's project theme (proposed by Pat) will, in my opinion, be a very challenging and interesting one. As you know, the theme is: Joy vs. Sorrow. I enjoyed shooting last month's theme (people at work) even while I was on vacation in the U.S. Southwest.
Last weekend, I had occasion to do a family portrait at Stanford University for a friend of mine. I shot both digital (D100 w/24-135mm) and film (Tri-X w/Nikon F4 and 50mm). I had no problems transitioning between the two cameras, but whenever I switched to the F4, I REALLY noticed the bright and clear 100% viewfinder of the F4. It was a great pleasure to shoot with it. I recently saw an excellent condition F4s sell on Ebay for under $300 (!!!). That's a ridiculously low price for such an incredible camera. I already have two F4s bodies, and I know this sounds crazy, but I sometimes like to just put the two of them on my desk and just admire the design of them. When I have a chance, I'll post a few from this session after they're all processed.
Dennis Fong is getting back into the swing of things with his recent acquisition of a D100. He badly needs a lens wider than 24mm, so I got him out with four superwide lenses one evening to do a comparison session. I borrowed Benson's Tokina 12-24mm and Nikon 18-70, and I brought my own Sigma 15-30mm and Tokina 17mm (prime), and we did some shooting at Lincoln Park in San Francisco. At first, I was going to use my tripod to try some direct comparison shots, but we decided to just go handheld and unscientific. For myself, I can report that I basically forgot which lens was mounted on my D100, and after a while, I just concentrated on making pictures. I will post a few from this session soon too. After all this, I lent Dennis my Tokina 17mm for his trip to Yosemite. I hope he posts some shots from his Yosemite trip, and his own conclusions from the test shoot.
I also asked Steve Fong to post a comparison of his new D2X with his old camera, the D70. He agreed to do this when he has some time.
The other day, I watched a biography of photographer, Robert Capa, on PBS. Did any of you see this? It was a fascinating program. As you probably know, Capa is arguably the most famous war photographer in the history of photography. He was the only photographer present at the D-Day landing at Normandy, and the story of what happened that day was amazing. He shot over a hundred images using a pair of Contax II rangefinder cameras (w/50mm lens). They rushed the film to London where the lab technician, in a rush to get the film ready, forgot to open the vents in the film drying closet and MELTED almost all the film!!! Only 11 images survived, but these images were published, and were incredible documentation of the drama that day.
The documentary also included an interview with Henri Cartier-Bresson that I enjoyed very much. At one point, they compared the styles of Capa, Bresson, and David Seymour (nickname: Chim), by showing images from the 3 legendary photographers, and sure enough, the stylistic differences were immediately obvious. Bresson: impeccable composition, Chim: intimacy with the subject, Capa: dynamic movement and drama.
I laughed when I saw a picture of Capa when he shot the British handover of Palestine at Haifa. He had cameras draped all over his body. I saw 2 TLR's (probably Rolleiflexes), 1 Hasselblad, 1 Contax or Leica, and what looked like a medium format folder, and he was holding a tripod in one hand.
Martin, I would love to hear your thoughts on these legends of photojournalism. You lived the PJ life, so I'm sure you have a unique perspective on this subject.
Administrative reminder: Please respond to comments on the forum instead of replying to the email. Some of us do not get the email notifications, so will never see the reply.
That's all for now, happy shooting!
--Warren
4 Comments:
It looks like a flag! :)
Nice, vibrant colors too.
--WT
Thx man. I like this photo. I had some fun taking it, too.
Eric
Hi Eric,
All I can say about this photo is....
I WISH I HAD TAKEN IT!!!
:-)
Best regards,
SteveR
Thx Steve. I found this one a lot of fun to scope out and take.
Eric
Post a Comment