Tuesday, June 28, 2005
Monday, June 27, 2005
1 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Martin, you're making remarkable pictures with that mini-DV camera. I read some stuff about that camera on the Internet. It has quite a cult following. I guess you don't need a new digital camera after all :)
does anyone notice the similarity between this picture and my Ferrari 250GTO picture? It's the vivid red color that stands out against the drab surroundings.
Aside from that, on the whole, this picture gives me a calm and peaceful feeling. I guess gentle, sweeping curves might have that effect on some people.
Nicely seen.
--WT
Sunday, June 26, 2005
3 Comments:
- SteveR said...
-
Wonderful photo! I find my eye going from the man in front to the cute little girl, to the face of the model on the wall.
Very effective "layering" of subjects.
Plus the photo has a nice feel - a gentle sense of humor. - martin said...
-
Great photo! The different size and scale of the three elements make it work. Also the photo is a commentary on materialism and advertising in our society.
- Warren T. said...
-
Hey Guys, thanks for the nice comments. This was one of those "capture the moment" opportunities, and it's great when it turns out like it was intended. I was cooling down with an iced latte at the Stanford Shopping Center after the car show while waiting for Gail to get back from shopping. I was sitting at an outside table next to the coffee shop at the perfect position to get this shot. I waited until the right situation presented itself(the right combination of people and positions).
--Warren
1 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Oops, It would have been more appropriate to title this one: Telegraph Hill at Night. It's still technically correct since Telegraph Hill is in the North Beach Neighborhood.
--WT
Saturday, June 25, 2005
2 Comments:
- martin said...
-
Nice shot. What makes this shot good is both the panning which blurs the background and the intense color of the car against a background without much color. The only thing I would fix is the green glow which is a telltale sign of digital manipulation.
- Unknown said...
-
I like the very high contrast in addition to the panning and color elements Martin already spoke about. The high contrast, intense color and subject matter are reminiscent of pictures I saw growing up in the 70s giving it a nostalgic feeling.
Friday, June 24, 2005
Thursday, June 23, 2005
Turtles at Stow Lake
I used a Jupiter 50mm for this one. I find that this lens has a bit more contrast than my other lenses.
2 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Nice B&W, Martin. I haven't noticed this particular turtle spot at Stow Lake. Good positioning on the y-shaped limb in the picture. I also like perfectly centered ducks or gulls in the middle of the Y too.
When did you get the Jupiter lens? Is it from Ebay? I'm happy with my J-8 too.
The image is a bit small though, it's hard to make out the details.
--Warren - Warren T. said...
-
ah, that's better, thanks for making the picture bigger.
-WT
Fins!, 2004 Stanford Concours, Nikon D100, Tamron 24-135mm
Tired of all those landscape yet? And now, for something completely different. The Stanford Concours is coming up this Sunday. This is a shot from last year's event. Benson and I will be at the event this year. Anyone else want to meet us there? There should be some good automotive photo opportunities there.
--Warren
2 Comments:
- martin said...
-
Nice lines, nice color. A bit abstract, but I like it, it's art.
- Warren T. said...
-
Thanks Martin. Interestingly, by examining the various reflections, I'm reminded of exactly how I took this picture. I was holding a drink with one hand, and shooting the picture one handed with the other hand. :)
--WT
Wednesday, June 22, 2005
Uncropped version of previous photo
Crop or no crop? Photo made with the Sony MiniDV camera with a close-up lens attached. Exposure on automatic. The Sony camera has a 10X zoom. Too bad the file size is only 640x480. It's sufficient for the internet though.
5 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Fuschia again!
I like the uncropped version. How did you get the drops in mid air?
--WT - martin said...
-
Those drops were on a spider's web. I may need to get a new digital camera to do more photos like this. The drawbacks with the Sony are the small file size and the lack of a usable manual exposure. The auto focus and auto exposure work pretty well though.
- Warren T. said...
-
Martin, you've been using that Sony MiniDV for a lot of still pics. What model is it? I have to check it out.
--WT - Warren T. said...
-
Oh, I took a closer look at the picture, and I can see the litte spider web strands between the water drops. Very cool.
--WT - martin said...
-
It's a discontinued model Sony DCR-TRV900. It's not perfect for still photos though. The write time to the memory card is about six seconds. But you could record to video and frame grab to the flash card. What I do like is the lens, it's like 10x, at the long end it feels like a 300mm on a 35 camera. A newer model would be better. The problem with most consumer digital cameras is the zoom is 3X or 4X. There are some prosumer digitals with a 10x lens.
1 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Very nice Martin.
This is another spectacular after-the-rain macro. I remember your last one of the fuschia. What kind of flower is this?
I find myself looking at the large droplet to see if I can make out any reflections, very cool.
What are the technical specs on this shot (camera, lens, etc.)?
You probably blacked out the background, right? I was just wondering how you chose to leave a bit of it in at the lower right? I guess from a compositional standpoint, that works for me.
--Warren
Foliage Framed Falls, Nikon F4s, Sigma 15-30mm, Fuji Sensia 100
When I was deciding what film to take with me, I found an old roll of Sensia slide film that was expired as of 1998 (!!!). Well, the film still produced usable images, but the color balance was shifted a bit. I had to do some Photoshop color work to get it to a reasonable presentation.
I was attempting to get a different view of this often photographed spot. I walked around and then spotted this clearing. Using the 15-30mm zoom, it was easy for me to frame my subject with the surrounding trees. I also found it interesting that the clouds mimicked the shape of the adjacent granite peaks. I chose to leave the surrounding foliage dark in order to enhance the vignetting effect.
Since Gail was shooting the D100 w/24-135mm, I told her about this spot, and that she should shoot it with the D100. Because of the D100's CCD form factor, the 24mm wide end has an effective fov of 35mm, so she wasn't able to use the foliage in the same way as my version. Some people may prefer her version. You can see it on Warren's Place: Gail's version.
What do you think?
--Warren
Tuesday, June 21, 2005
Dolph Asked Me to Do This, Nikon D100
Fillmore Street Scene
I was talking to Dolph this afternoon and he asked me to post a "bad" picture. So to oblige him, here it is. I thought I had something here when I shot it, but in this original, uncropped version, it looks rather uninspiring.
So let's talk about this. What is wrong with this picture, and what, if anything, can be done to make it better? I have an idea, but I'll keep it to myself for the time being. While we're looking at it, is there anything good here?
--Warren
4 Comments:
- martin said...
-
This photo has no point of focus, lots of detail. My eye wanders looking for something and wonders what drew the photographer to snap the shutter. Was it the woman on the cell phone? Maybe the photo needs to be cropped so as the window display and the woman on the photo with the newspaper racks are shown. Actually the scene is pretty weak from the position you were standing. How many frames did you shoot of this? I find that shooting more frames, changing lenses or waiting for the situation to change may make for a better photo. Photography is not as easy as it seems, at times it's work.
- SteveR said...
-
This is a great exercise - can I contribute some bad photos as well? :-) I have plenty!!
As for this one, I agree with Martin- there just isn't any point of interest in the scene, nothing to draw me in. I like the slant of the street, which shows up compared to the buildings, but there is to much extraneous detail to build on that.
I'm with Martin - the woman on the cell phone and the window display might have been a good basis for a good street photo.
I have a post on my blog on a similar theme, called "Near Misses, Also-Rans, and the One That Got Away" at http://therosenblog.blogspot.com/2005/03/near-misses-also-rans-and-one-that-got.html
Best regards,
SteveR - Warren T. said...
-
Hey, if all it takes to get you guys to speak up is posting a bad picture, I can keep this site very busy. :) I have lots that nobody ever sees.
I'll wait to see if anyone else has anything more to say before I give you all the background on this, why I took this, including some answers to Martin's questions.
Thanks for the comments, I enjoyed reading your opinions, advice, and your unique perspectives.
--Warren - Warren T. said...
-
Since the silent majority seems to be remaining silent this time too, I'll tell you the background on this one. I often like to use a single, fixed focal length lens on various photo excursions. This time, I chose to mount the 50mm f1.8D lens on the D100. I then use the sneaker-zoom method (walk back and forth) if my shots need to be framed differently.
So there we were strolling on Fillmore street when I noticed the woman on her cell phone with her purple hair, leaning up against the newspaper stands. I thought that it might make a good subject for a street shot.
Since I could only use my sneaker-zoom technique, I couldn't very well run into the middle of Fillmore street thereby either getting run over or drawing undue attention to myself and ruining the candid nature of the picture.
So, I thought that I'd just shoot it from my relatively obscure position from across the street, then crop it later for the final image. I only shot the one frame because I wasn't interested in working too hard on this particular shot.
I did crop the image a while ago, but I deemed it not good enough to post onto FPCF.
--Warren
Monday, June 20, 2005
Mist Trail Hikers by Vernal Falls, Nikon D100, Tamron 24-135mm.
On our favorite viewpoint for Vernal Falls, the mist was flying at us at a good rate. It was very refreshing after an uphill hike to this point. The big Sigma 15-30mm zoom that was mounted on my F4s has a huge, curved front element that cannot be protected by a filter. I didn't want to risk getting water spots on the lens, so I did not shoot with the F4 here. Instead, I convinced Gail to let me shoot one with the D100. I cropped this shot a little from the original image to better show the hikers making their way up the wet and sometimes treacherous Mist Trail to the top of Vernal Falls.
--Warren
2 Comments:
- Unknown said...
-
I always have a hard time w/ waterfalls. They never seem to come out as majestic as when you are right there.
You did a great job capturing the magnitude of the falls. The walls of granite behind that keep reaching up, the slight peak of blue sky letting the viewer feel enclosed by these canyon walls, the swooping lines of the foreground rock lead my eye to the falls and the hikers give a sense of scale. I also like the way the falls pop, the contrast is good - maybe just a little bit much but it makes them stand out more - Warren T. said...
-
Thanks for the comment, Tony. I enjoyed your well written, descriptive, and detailed analysis.
Have you been to Yosemite? If so, let's see some pics :)
--Warren
Bird Photographer in Meadow, Nikon F4s, Sigma 15-30mm, Kodak E100GX
Gail and I only had about 24 hours to spend on our short trip to Yosemite. We mainly stayed in the valley. I did a bunch of meadow shots. Here, I grabbed a shot of this photographer stalking an oriole amid the tall plants in the meadow. (I left the black borders on the scanned image to show that it's a full frame image)
--Warren
Sunday, June 19, 2005
Family in the Meadow, Nikon F4s, Sigma 15-30mm
Film: Kodak UC100
As I was playing with different compositions using the ultrawide 15-30mm zoom, I spied this family enjoying the meadow next to Curry Village in Yosemite. They were heading toward me on the trail, so I waited for the right moment to take the shot. I was about 2 feet from the plant in the foreground. It probably appeared to them like I was just taking a picture of the plant.
--Warren
2 Comments:
- SteveR said...
-
If I were the family, I'd love to have this one! Very peaceful feeling. I like that s-curve thing you have going from the boardwalk. The way you were able to get everything well composed and in its place (layered?) from foreground to background is very cool!
- Warren T. said...
-
Thanks Steve. It's always fun and challenging to explore different compositions with an ultrawide.
Speaking of S-curves, I saw another one on the Mist Trail and I told Gail to pose for me there. I posted that picture to Warren's Place. It was shot on UC100 film with the F4s/50mm f1.8D. You can see Gail holding the D100. I had a hard time prying it from her hands, so I shot mostly with the F4s on this trip.
http://warren128.blogspot.com/2005/06/picture-gail-on-mist-trail.html
--Warren
Monday, June 13, 2005
Ok, Ok, I'm posting a photo
A recent shot of a sunset from the top of a hill in the city. Good sunsets are not easy to get in the city. I shot this on a digital camera (it isn't a Nikon or Canon). I was surprised it turned out at all.
2 Comments:
- Warren T. said...
-
Martin, what's the dark section on the bottom of the picture, fog?
Thanks for posting.
Warren - martin said...
-
I believe it was a low cloud layer out in the distance. I was trapped into using the auto exposure in the camera as I didn't know how to manually do the exposure. Camera exposed for the sky, which was good as I didn't want to wash it out. I case you're wondering, the camera used was a Sony miniDV camcorder.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment