Monday, December 12, 2011

St. Bartholomew Dome Interior

I got up at the proverbial oh-dark-thirty Saturday morning to take a 5:30 am bus to Manhattan for a lesson in post-processing workflow with the incomparable Dave Beckerman. Specifically, Dave shared with me his more than two years of using NIK Software's suite of impressive add-ins for Photoshop or Lightroom.

It was a great experience - Dave is very creative and an excellent teacher. If any of you get a chance to spend some time in NYC, try to look him up, or even better, take a lesson from him. You won't be sorry.

After our lesson, I went to St. Bartholomew's on Park Avenue and 51st Street. It's a beautiful Byzantine-style basilica. It's one of those special places where even if think you haven't seen it, you probably have - Hollywood loves it for scenes of high-falutin' weddings. Both the original and the remake of Arthur used St. Bart's for their wedding scenes. The church also had a very big part in the Angelina Jolie film, Salt.

I took several interior shots with a tripod at St. Bart's before a docent came up to me and said that tripods were not allowed. To get this photo of the interior of the dome, I laid my camera flat on its back on a table just underneath the crossing, set it for Automatic Exposure Bracketing, and triggered off the three exposures with my infrared remote shutter release. Back home, I assembled the three exposures using NIK's HDR Effex Pro to get what you see here.

It's very interesting... I could barely make out the detail in the dome, it was that dark. But thanks to 21st-century electronics, our digital sensors just keep sucking up photons until the image processing chip says "enough." And unlike film, long exposures don't suffer from reciprocity failure. What a great world we photographers now live in!

p.s. Sorry about that photo of Russel Brand running out of St. Bart's in his gatkes.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Great story behind this interesting image. :)

--WT

Monday, December 12, 2011 at 3:48:00 PM PST  
Blogger dan in marin said...

Great geometry Steve. Love the colors as well.

Dan

Monday, December 12, 2011 at 5:12:00 PM PST  

Post a Comment

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Flag Ladder Foolery

Flag LadderAt the carnival the other morning, I found this "flag ladder" lying next to a white trailer. I propped it up against the trailer, noticed the strong shadow, and liked the shapes and colors.

Back in the lab, the deep black shadows my eyes saw turned out to be not-so-deep greyish-blue. The photo at left is about the best I could do by just setting the trailer to white point in the Levels control (I use Photoshop Elements 4, so I don't have access to curves.)

I still wanted to see what my eyes "saw", so I used the polygonal lasso tool to select the shadow areas and make them really black. While I was at it, I lassoed the colored parts of the ladder so as to bring up the white areas.


Flag Ladder - ModifiedHere's what the end result looks like. Definitely more dramatic, but did I overdo it? (BTW, the jpg here shows some jaggies along the edges of the black shadow, but in the full-sized image, the edge is very clean.)

What do you think?

Labels: , , ,

4 Comments:

Blogger Warren T. said...

Hi Steve, thanks for posting this interesting exercise. Personally, I would prefer a dark gray shadow vs. the totally black shadow of the 2nd version. The problem is with contrast. The totally black shadow on white trailer does not match the lower contrast of the colored part of the ladder. If you have time, try this:

- do the color and white enhancement to the colored parts like you did with the 2nd shot.
- leave the shadow along for now
- do the USM contrast enhancement trick (20,50,0)
- if you able to, and if it needs it, "burn" tool the shadow part.
- convert the colorspace to srgb
- save the file

The composition is indeed very dramatic, nice!

--Warren

Tuesday, July 15, 2008 at 7:09:00 AM PDT  
Blogger Warren T. said...

i forgot to mention that on my test of your image, rather than lasso the colored portion, I dodged those parts to bring out the color. It's ust different tools to achieve the same results.

Tuesday, July 15, 2008 at 7:11:00 AM PDT  
Blogger Warren T. said...

Actually, black shadow mixed with white wall should be a shade of gray. Think back on that scene. Did your physical eyeballs see a shade of dark gray, or pitch black? Did you see any details in the shadow area?

Or were you referring to your photographic mind's eye deciding that a black shadow would be more dramatic for the composition?

Just pondering...

--Warren

Tuesday, July 15, 2008 at 9:03:00 AM PDT  
Blogger Warren T. said...

hi Steve, did you ever do anything more with this picture? Or no time? Or was it just a rhetorical question? :)

--WT

Thursday, July 31, 2008 at 11:16:00 AM PDT  

Post a Comment