Street Shooting: same day as my previous picture. This little girl was playing peek-a-boo with me as we were watching the grand opening of the restaurant across the street. The framing was estimated. We were looking at each other while my camera was at around waist level when I snapped the picture. I like the vintage look and feel of the shot. Camera: Zorki 4 w/50mm f2 lens. Film was Tri-X.
Tuesday, September 07, 2004
Street Shooting: same day as my previous picture. This little girl was playing peek-a-boo with me as we were watching the grand opening of the restaurant across the street. The framing was estimated. We were looking at each other while my camera was at around waist level when I snapped the picture. I like the vintage look and feel of the shot. Camera: Zorki 4 w/50mm f2 lens. Film was Tri-X.
Contributors
Links
- FPCF Home Page
- Rangefinder Forum
- Micro 4/3 Forum
- Serious Compacts Forum
- ViewfinderSF.com(Warren's web gallery site)
- Viewfinder-SF(Warren's SF Only Photoblog)
- Steve Rosenbach Photography
- Lea's Flickr Photostream (Lea)
- heart, soul, & a camera(Back Alley's Photoblog)
- Sweetfstop (Dan's new photo site)
- Lena's Aminus3 Photoblog
- Sweetfstop (Dan's new photo site)
Previous Posts
- Hurrican Winds Begin, and it got a lot stronger on...
- Street Shooting with my Soviet made Zorki 4, 35mm ...
- Project of the Month List
- Contributor Biographies
Archives
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- June 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- October 2011
- November 2011
- December 2011
- January 2012
- February 2012
- March 2012
- April 2012
- May 2012
- June 2012
- July 2012
- August 2012
- September 2012
- October 2012
- November 2012
- December 2012
- January 2013
- February 2013
- March 2013
- April 2013
- May 2013
- June 2013
- July 2013
- August 2013
- September 2013
- October 2013
- November 2013
- December 2013
- January 2014
- February 2014
- March 2014
- April 2014
- May 2014
- June 2014
- July 2014
- August 2014
- September 2014
- October 2014
- November 2014
- December 2014
- January 2015
- February 2015
- June 2015
- August 2015
- September 2015
- October 2015
- December 2015
5 Comments:
Again, I'm not familiar with Tri-X but the photo is quite grainy. I also noticed some scratches on the shot, is it on the negative or print? Is it from the camera? If it was in color, I could say that it was taken in the current time. However, being B&W, grainy, scratchy, and no background for reference, it could easily pass for a very old photograph much like some pictures of relatives from a long time ago.
This photo is a better than the previous photo of the photographers. Showing faces can tell much about the subject. But maybe you should show more. How was she dressed? What were the surroundings? Showing more would give more information to the viewer showing the context in which the photo was taken. Cropping of the shot was a bit tight, tight cropping is good for a headshot or a portrait but maybe not in this case.
Thanks Martin. I agree with your comments regarding cropping, etc, especially about the importance of showing context. Unfortunately, I was standing right next to her and photographing from the hip with a 50mm!
Just some additional thoughts...
Upon further reflection, I think that this particular picture does not require additional context, but rather can stand alone as a character study. I think the girl's face tells enough on it's own. I like that fact this portrait has a timeless quality in that it could be a vintage shot, and not the recent picture that it is. You can see enough of her clothing to tell that she is not dressed in the finest clothes.
Her expression would be different if I had the camera at eye level.
Warren
Jill, when you shoot from the hip, you are most likely NOT looking through the viewfinder. The composition is purely by the "guess-and-pray-that-it-works" method. I had the focus and exposure preset, then I watched the expression on the subjects face to determine when to click the shutter. When you are looking through the viewfinder at someone (say a stranger on the street, or the girl in this picture), that person often does not have as natural an expression as when they are unaware that you took a picture. The Zorki 4 is very quiet in operation and like a Leica rangefinder, is very well suited to this kind of photography. --Warren
Post a Comment